Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Serum angiotensin converting enzyme
Free
  1. PANKAJ SHARMA
  1. IAN SMITH,
  2. JOHN SCHNEERSON
  1. BHF Clinician Scientist
  2. Clinical Pharmacology Unit
  3. University of Cambridge
  4. Cambridge, UK
  5. Papworth Hospital
  6. Papworth Everard
  7. Cambridge CB3 8RE, UK
  1. B G MARSHALL
  1. Department of Respiratory Medicine
  2. National Heart and Lung Institute
  3. Imperial College School of Medicine
  4. London W2 1PG, UK

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Marshall and Shaw in their editorial1 are correct to hypothesise that the normal range of serum angiotensin converting enzyme (SACE) would be narrower if ACE genotype (insertion/deletion; ID) is also taken into account. This would split its wide normal range into three narrower ranges defined by the genotypes II, ID and DD, with SACE concentrations rising co-dominantly with each copy of the D allele. However, they fail to realise that we have already shown that, not only is this the case, but also if SACE is measured in accordance with ACE genotype its diagnostic sensitivity in acute sarcoidosis is improved by 33.5%.2

In our paper we determined a genotype based normal range for SACE with 146 healthy white volunteers. Using this new normal range, SACE was measured in 29 patients with histologically proven sarcoidosis. The new SACE genotype based normal range identified 69% of these patients, an improvement of 33.5% on the previous normal range which identified only 51.7% of our patients with sarcoidosis.2Importantly, our work has also been independently confirmed.3

We suggest that the genotype based SACE normal range should be determined locally (especially for different racial populations4) to improve its sensitivity in the diagnosis of active sarcoidosis.

References

authors’ reply We thank Drs Smith and colleagues for their welcome comments regarding their excellent paper published in the Lancet last year. We are delighted that their findings concord with the hypothesis we raised in our editorial on serum angiotensin converting enzyme polymorphisms. We apologise for not referring to it in the text.