Chest
Volume 96, Issue 3, September 1989, Pages 557-563
Journal home page for Chest

Clinical Investigations
Comparison of Two-Minute Incremental Threshold Loading and Maximal Loading as Measures of Respiratory Muscle Endurance

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.96.3.557Get rights and content

We performed a two-minute incremental threshold loading test (incremental test) in ten normal subjects on three occasions, and having ascertained the maximum load (max load) against which they could inspire for two minutes, measured how long this load could be tolerated by these same subjects on three further occasions (tlim test). We compared the reproducibility of the two tests. There were no significant differences found in the mean max loads in the three incremental tests, or in the endurance times in the three tlim tests. However, the intraindividual coefficients of variation of max load in the incremental test (0 to 14 percent) were much smaller than the intraindividual coefficients of variation of endurance time in the tlim test (20 to 65 percent). We found that the large variability in endurance time in our tlim tests was most likely accounted for by variability in breathing pattern, inspiratory flow rate and breath-by-breath mouth pressure generation. Differences in these parameters did not, however, explain why in the tlim test a given subject could tolerate for 19 minutes a load only 100 g less than that which he was unable to tolerate for two minutes in the incremental test. These findings emphasize the differences between these two tests of respiratory muscle endurance. Since there was less intraindividual variability in the two-minute incremental threshold loading test, we suggest that this test may be more useful than the tlim test.

Section snippets

METHODS

The study group consisted of ten subjects, five men and five women, with no history of pulmonary, cardiac or neuromuscular disease. Ages ranged from 21 to 39 years and all had previous experience with the weighted plunger apparatus (see Table 1).

In each subject, maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) at the mouth was measured using the protocol of Black and Hyatt.10 The determination was repeated until three measurements, with less than 5 percent variability and sustained for at least one second

RESULTS

In the two-minute incremental test, the mean max loads achieved by the ten subjects in three consecutive tests were not different (Table 2). The intraindividual coefficients of variation of max load ranged from 0 to 14 percent. No significant intertest difference was found for Pmean, Ppeak/MIP, TI/TT or VT/TI (all p>0.05) measured in the final two minutes of the incremental tests (Table 2 and Fig 1). Mean PETCO2 in the final two minutes of the three incremental tests was 40 ±3, 39 ±5, 40 ±5 mm

DISCUSSION

We found that both the two-minute incremental threshold loading test and the tlim test were reproducible over three measurements at least 24 hours apart. The statistical test used to reach this conclusion, a repeated measures ANOVA, while an appropriate test to apply, disguises a more important observation. This is that while the coefficients of variation of max load in the incremental test were small (range 0 to 14 percent), the coefficients of variation of tlim in the tlim test were large

ACKNOWLEDGMENT:

The authors wish to thank Barry Wiggs for his help with statistical analysis.

REFERENCES (18)

  • S Freedman

    Sustained maximum voluntary ventilation

    Respir Physiol

    (1970)
  • TL Clanton et al.

    Inspiratory muscle conditioning using a threshold loading device

    Chest

    (1985)
  • BG Nickerson et al.

    Measuring ventilatory muscle endurance in humans as sustainable inspiratory pressure

    J Appl Physiol

    (1982)
  • C Roussos et al.

    Fatigue of inspiratory muscles and their synergic behaviour

    J Appl Physiol

    (1979)
  • JS Gray et al.

    Ventilatory function tests: I. Voluntary ventilation capacity

    J Clin Invest

    (1950)
  • DE Leith et al.

    Ventilatory muscle strength and endurance training

    J Appl Physiol

    (1976)
  • M Chen et al.

    Inspiratory muscle training in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

    Am Rev Respir Dis

    (1985)
  • CS Roussos et al.

    Diaphragmatic fatigue in man

    J Appl Physiol

    (1977)
  • JB Martyn et al.

    Measurement of inspiratory muscle performance with incremental threshold loading

    Am Rev Respir Dis

    (1987)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (30)

  • PULMONARY REHABILITATION IN CHILDREN

    2017, Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes
  • Respiratory muscle endurance after training in athletes and non-athletes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    2016, Physical Therapy in Sport
    Citation Excerpt :

    The measure required less apparatus and did not require high flow rates, which facilitated comparisons between those with airflow limitation versus healthy subjects. This test was later modified to an incremental threshold test devised by McElvaney, Fairbarn, Wilcox, and Pardy (1989) whereby subjects started at a low load and weights were added at two-minute intervals until task failure. Some investigators also used the maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV) as a RME measure; however, it is questionable whether such a short duration test is reflective of RME (ATS, 2002; Driller & Panton, 2012; Freedman, 1970).

  • Determinants of dyspnea and alveolar hypoventilation during exercise in cystic fibrosis: Impact of inspiratory muscle endurance

    2011, Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
    Citation Excerpt :

    Thereafter, PImax being influenced by hyperinflation, we calculated the decrease on PImax by liter of FRC increase above predicted [14]. Inspiratory muscle endurance (IME) was assessed by the incremental threshold loading (ITL) test as previously described with a modified commercial Threshold IMT® (Respironics) device with a spring loaded valve [15–17]. The spring was modified to produce inspiratory pressure loads up to 120 cm H2O.

  • Resistive inspiratory muscle training: Its effectiveness in patients with acute complete cervical cord injury

    2000, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
    Citation Excerpt :

    Recent studies have shown that using inspiratory pressure load training can prevent these defects. The potential advantage of this kind of device is that the inspiratory pressure is independent of the inspiratory flow rate.23-28 Nevertheless, the relative benefits of RIMT are that it is an inexpensive training procedure that may be self-administrated over the long term, and that the DHD inspiratory resistive muscle trainer is simple, light, and portable.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Supported by the B.C. Lung Association and Medical Research Council, Canada.

Manuscript received August 16; revision accepted December 9.

View full text