Chest
Volume 117, Issue 6, June 2000, Pages 1613-1618
Journal home page for Chest

Clinical Investigations
SLEEP
Validation of the POLY-MESAM Seven-Channel Ambulatory Recording Unit

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.117.6.1613Get rights and content

Study objectives

To determine the recording capabilities of the POLY-MESAM (PM) unit (MAP; Martinsried, Germany), an American Sleep Disorders Association level III system, and to compare it with simultaneous 12-channel polysomnography in the sleep laboratory.

Measurements and results

Fifty-three patients (49 men and 4 women) with obstructive sleep-related breathing disorders of varying severity were included. The apnea-hypopnea indexes (AHIs) obtained using the two methods differed significantly from each other, although the correlation was close. The PM unit produced false-negative results in patients with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The sensitivity of the PM unit in detecting patients with an AHI > 10 was 92%, while the specificity was 96.3%.

Conclusions

The correlation of AHIs obtained with polysomnography and with the PM unit is close. However, in some cases, the PM may underestimate OSA parameters. The PM unit produces false-negative results in patients with mild to moderate OSA. While inpatient polysomnography remains the “gold standard,” the PM unit may provide an inexpensive alternative in some special cases.

Section snippets

Materials and Methods

Patients who attended our clinic for sleep-related respiratory disorders and snoring were randomly selected. Those with chronic obstructive lung disease and cardiac insufficiency (New York Heart Association score > 2) were excluded. Fifty-three subjects were recruited and admitted to the hospital, were examined further, and underwent simultaneous polygraphy and polysomnography. For polygraphy, the PM unit was used, and for polysomnography the SIDAS GS system (Stimotron; Wendelstein, Germany)

Results

In general, values recorded by the PM unit were lower than those returned by standard polysomnography. This can be seen in Table 1, which presents data regarding the ODI, AHI, AI, HI, and arousal index (ie, the number of arousals per hour of sleep) in the complete patient group. Raw data for individual patients are presented in Table 2 .

The evaluation of data returned by polysomnography yielded AHI values between 0.2 and 75.9 (mean [± SD], 17.9 ± 18.1). In comparison, findings from polygraphy

Discussion

This study and previous studies comparing level III devices with the “gold standard” of polysomnography suffer from the inherent problem that for study purposes both types of measurement systems are used while being attended in the laboratory. Of course, by definition, level III devices are not designed to be used in this way. Laboratory use may give a false degree of reliability that is not found when used in the home.

In the present study, there was a high degree of correlation between the

Conclusion

The correlation of AHIs using polysomnography and the PM unit is close. However, in some cases, the use of the PM unit results in an underestimation of the AHI. The PM unit produces false-negative results in patients with mild to moderate OSA. Although inpatient polysomnography remains the “gold standard” because of that reason, the PM unit may provide an inexpensive alternative for the indications recommended by the ASDA.1

References (11)

  • R Stoohs et al.

    MESAM4: an ambulatory device for the detection of patients at risk for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS)

    Chest

    (1992)
  • R Ferber et al.

    ASDA standards of practice: practice parameters for the use of portable recording in the assessment of obstructive sleep apnea

    Sleep

    (1994)
  • Th Verse et al.

    First results of a prospective study validating the method of ambulatory polysomnography using the POLY-MESAM unit

    Sleep Breathing

    (1997)
  • A Rechtschaffen et al.

    A manual of standardized terminology techniques and scoring system for sleep stages in human subjects

    (1968)
  • S Cohrs et al.

    Validierung eines ambulanten Screeninggera¨tes fu¨r schlafbezogene Atmungssto¨rungen: APNOESCREEN I

    Somnologie

    (1998)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (57)

  • Optimal Body Mass Index Cut-offs for Identification of Patients with Coronary Artery Disease at High Risk of Obstructive Sleep Apnoea

    2016, Heart Lung and Circulation
    Citation Excerpt :

    The device has been validated against in-laboratory polysomnography for diagnosis of OSA [19]. Although limited by the lack of objective measurement of sleep duration and the inability to examine sleep-staging, the reported sensitivity and specificity of the Embletta Gold diagnostic device were from 92-97% and 64-96% respectively [20–22]. Output measures recorded were airflow (nasal cannula), oxygen saturation (pulse oximetry), thoraco-abdominal movements (inductive respiratory bands), snoring episodes (integrated pressure transducer), electrocardiography, and body position (continuous actigraphy).

  • Snoring analysis methods

    2011, Medicina Clinica
View all citing articles on Scopus

The POLY-MESAM unit was loaned to the authors by the MAP Company (16 Fraunhoferstrasse, 82152 Martinsried, Germany). No person at MAP has read the manuscript or has been involved in any of the research, which is the sole responsibility of the authors.

View full text