Chest
Volume 103, Issue 3, March 1993, Pages 850-856
Journal home page for Chest

Clinical Investigations
Incidence and Natural History of Phrenic Neuropathy Occurring During Open Heart Surgery

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.103.3.850Get rights and content

Objective

To study the incidence of phrenic neuropathy following coronary artery bypass grafting and determine long-term outcome.

Design

Prospective observational.

Setting

Surgical ICU in a university hospital, out-patient follow-up.

Patients

Ninety-two consecutive patients undergoing open heart surgery.

Interventions

None.

Measurements

Chest radiographs (CXR) 48 to 72 h postoperatively, ultrasonography of diaphragm, phrenic nerve conduction studies, diaphragmatic electromyogram, each repeated every 1 to 3 months until normal.

Main results

Seventy-eight of 92 (78 percent) patients had abnormal radiographs, 42 of 78 (54 percent) with abnormal CXRs had abnormal diaphragm motion, 24 of 42 (57 percent) with abnormal motion had phrenic neuropathy. Patients with normal diaphragm motion improved faster than those without; patients with normal nerve conduction (and abnormal motion) improved faster than those with abnormal nerve conduction.

Conclusions

Phrenic neuropathy is relatively common if sensitive tests are utilized for diagnosis. Nerve conduction studies can predict duration of morbidity. Most patients have low morbidity and recover fully. Abnormal diaphragm motion alone is not diagnostic of phrenic nerve injury.

Section snippets

Study Design

Ninety-six consecutive patients undergoing open heart surgery at a tertiary care hospital between March 15, 1989 and August 28, 1989 were prospectively evaluated for inclusion in the study. Surgical technique was not dictated by the study; all patients received topical hypothermia with a target temperature of 12° to 15°C. In addition to the use of cold blood cardioplegia, an ice slush was loosely placed around both the anterior and posterior surfaces of the heart. All patients had the use of a

Patient Population

During the study period, 96 open heart surgery procedures were performed. Of these, four patients were excluded from initial analysis: three died of adult respiratory distress syndrome prior to being evaluated and one had a right upper lobectomy in addition to the coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Thus, 92 patients were included in the study. Seventy-eight of these 92 patients had CABG only, 63 with internal mammary artery (IMA) grafting (58 left, I right, and 4 bilateral IMA grafts). Two

DISCUSSION

While other studies on phrenic neuropathy have usually relied on single techniques for diagnosis, eg, CXR or phrenic NCS, we have taken a comparatively conservative approach to the diagnosis. We have required that CXR, sonography, and NCS all be abnormal for the diagnosis. Moreover, we chose a conservative value for the upper limit of normal for phrenic nerve latency, 10.0 ms, which is the upper range in the study of 50 control subjects by Markand et al.5 We did not use mean ± 2 SD (9.3 ms in

CONCLUSIONS

We examined 92 of 96 consecutive patients undergoing open heart surgery of which 78 had clinical or radiologic abnormalities suggestive of diaphragmatic dysfunction. Of these 78, 42 had sonographic abnormalities and underwent phrenic NCSs that were abnormal in 24 cases. Thus, 24 of 92 patients had initial radiologic, sonographic, and neurophysiologic evidence of phrenic neuropathy. Over the first postoperative year, sonography and NCSs normalized in patients with definite phrenic neuropathy,

REFERENCES (14)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (96)

  • Diaphragm Dysfunction After Cardiac Surgery: Reappraisal

    2021, Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
  • Neurologic complications of cardiac and vascular surgery

    2017, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Patients with persistent symptoms should undergo further testing with NCS to delineate axonal or myelin involvement, as axonal injury is associated with longer recovery. Phrenic nerve injuries are usually asymptomatic, and the majority of patients recover within 3–6 months (DeVita et al., 1993). The required time for healing depends on the type of injury (e.g., demyelination versus axonal injury) and the regeneration distance.

  • Exercise Therapy for a Patient With Persistent Dyspnea After Combined Traumatic Diaphragmatic Rupture and Phrenic Nerve Injury

    2015, PM and R
    Citation Excerpt :

    Confirmation of an elevated hemidiaphragm by chest radiography and computed tomography is effective for the diagnosis of phrenic nerve dysfunction; however, for a more accurate diagnosis, the sniff test, ultrasonography, and a phrenic nerve conduction study also should be performed. Of these tests, the nerve conduction study is the gold standard [8,9]. In the present case, the phrenic nerve injury was accompanied by a diaphragmatic rupture; however, as previously noted, an elevated hemidiaphragm was identified on chest radiography and computed tomography at the time of injury, and the initial diagnosis was only of diaphragmatic rupture, which delayed the diagnosis of the phrenic nerve injury.

  • Injuries of the Nerves of the Thorax

    2015, Nerves and Nerve Injuries: Pain, Treatment, Injury, Disease and Future Directions: Vol 2
View all citing articles on Scopus

Manuscript received May 19; revision accepted September 22

View full text