Advertisement

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Opinion

Opinion articles provide a forum for expression of views, and responses to previous statements, on a range of topical, emerging and controversial issues.

See all article types »

Shield as Signal: Lipopolysaccharides and the Evolution of Immunity to Gram-Negative Bacteria

Citation: Munford RS, Varley AW (2006) Shield as Signal: Lipopolysaccharides and the Evolution of Immunity to Gram-Negative Bacteria. PLoS Pathog 2(6): e67. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.0020067

Editor: Marianne Manchester, Scripps Research Institute, United States of America

Published: June 30, 2006

Copyright: © 2006 Munford and Varley. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Funding: The authors' research is supported by grant AI18188 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and by the Jan and Henri Bromberg Chair in Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Abbreviations: AOAH, acyloxyacyl hydrolase; CAMP, cationic antimicrobial peptide; LPS, lipopolysaccharide

According to the innate immunity concept [1], animals defend themselves from microbes by recognizing pathogen-associated molecular patterns. To detect many Gram-negative bacteria, animals use the CD14–MD-2–TLR4 receptor mechanism to recognize the lipid A moiety of the cell wall lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Lipid A is a glucosamine disaccharide that carries phosphates at positions 1 and 4′ and usually has four primary (glucosamine-linked) hydroxyacyl chains and one or more secondary acyl chains. Gram-negative bacteria produce numerous variations on this basic structure, yet sensitive LPS recognition and pro-inflammatory signaling by human TLR4 occur only when lipid A has both phosphates and is hexaacyl, with two secondary acyl chains.

What might bacteria derive from producing this type of lipid A, and what do animals gain from recognizing it? A survey of diverse lipid A structures found that the best-recognized configuration is produced by most of the aerobic or facultatively anaerobic Gram-negative bacteria that can live in the gastrointestinal and upper respiratory tracts. We hypothesize that the CD14–MD-2–TLR4 mechanism evolved to recognize not just pathogens, but also many of the commensals (normal flora) and colonizers that can inhabit the body's most vulnerable surfaces. Producing this lipid A structure seems to favor bacterial persistence on host mucosae, whereas recognizing it allows the host to kill invading bacteria within subepithelial tissues and prevent dissemination. A conserved host lipase can then limit the inflammatory response by removing a key feature of the lipid A signal, the secondary acyl chains.

Acylation of Lipid A: Strengthening the Shield?

Gram-negative bacteria that inhabit water, soil, plants, or insects display impressive diversity in their lipid A structures (see Table S1). Although the backbone is almost always a bisphosphorylated disaccharide that has three or more primary fatty acyl chains, the secondary acyl chains differ in their number, length, and degree of saturation. In contrast, the lipid A structures produced by most of the aerobic and facultatively anaerobic Gram-negative bacteria that live as human mucosal commensals, colonizers, or pathogens [2] are monotonously similar: they have two phosphates, four primary hydroxyacyl chains (3-hydroxymyrisate or 3-hydroxylaurate), and two saturated secondary acyl chains (laurate, myristate, or both); we shall refer to this composition as “mucosal” lipid A. Since these bacteria differ in many other ways, the fact that their lipid As are so similar suggests that this structure may confer some advantage.

Mucosal secretions contain numerous cationic antimicrobial peptides (CAMPs) [3]. As noted by Miller [4] and others, increased resistance to CAMPs and other host molecules may explain why Gram-negative bacteria that colonize mucosae usually make LPS with six or more acyl chains (Figure 1). Although we found no demonstration that this lipid A structure enables commensal bacteria to thrive on mucosal surfaces, the evidence that it does so for colonizers and pathogens is extensive. Having hexaacyl (rather than pentaacyl) lipid A enables Bordetella and Haemophilus species to persist in the respiratory tract [5–7] and Neisseria gonorrhoeae to survive within epithelial cells [8]. Pseudomonas aeruginosa lives in water, produces a predominantly pentaacylated LPS, and does not colonize the mucosae of normal humans. When P. aeruginosa colonize the airways of children with cystic fibrosis, however, the bacteria often adapt by producing hexaacylated (and even heptaacylated) lipid A [9]. Mucosal lipid A is also found in intestinal pathogens: Shigella and Salmonella, pathogenic Escherichia coli [10], Aeromonas species, Plesiomonas shigelloides, and Vibrio cholerae O1. In Salmonella and some others, a PhoP/PhoQ-regulated transcriptional program promotes lipid A palmitoylation (heptaacylation) along with other changes that increase resistance to CAMPs [4,11–13]. Other mucosal bacteria may also produce lipid A that is more hydrophobic than mucosal lipid A, with longer secondary chains (Campylobacter jejuni) or more of them: heptaacyl (Moraxella) or octaacyl (V. cholerae O139). Those that produce less hydrophobic lipid A seem to be special cases: the pentaacyl LPS of Chlamydia species is found in spore-like elementary bodies, and Helicobacter pylori, with tetraacyl LPS, is adapted to live in the stomach.

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 1. Lipid A Structure, Bacterial Habitat, and Host Recognition

Approximate relationship between resistance to CAMPs, recognition by MD-2–TLR4, and lipid A acyl chain composition for Gram-negative aerobic or facultatively anaerobic bacteria living in different habitats. The number, length, and saturation of the acyl chains may all influence recognition by TLR4. In mucosal lipid A, the acyl chains are saturated and usually have 12 or 14 carbons.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.0020067.g001

Many other disease-associated Gram-negative bacteria have nonmucosal habitats. Their lipid A moieties differ from the typical mucosal structure by having shorter or longer acyl chains, unsaturated acyl chains, only four or five chains, or only one phosphate (see Table S1): Legionella (water habitat, often in free-living amoebae), Burkholderia pseudomallei (soil and water), Yersinia pestis (small rodents, lice), Coxiella burnetti (intracellular, livestock), Leptospira (water, animal urine), and Francisella tularensis (ticks, rabbits, other small animals). These pathogens usually enter vertebrate tissues via insect bites or cuts, within inhaled droplets, or across the conjunctivae. Brucellae (livestock), which inhabit macrophages yet are typically acquired via ingestion, also produce a nonmucosal LPS [14].

How Animals Sense Mucosal Gram-Negative Bacteria: Shield as Signal

Whereas bacterial peptide resistance and outer membrane impermeability seem to vary directly with the number of acyl chains, the inflammation-inducing CD14–MD-2–TLR4 sensory mechanism best recognizes lipid A that has the hexaacyl mucosal lipid A structure [15–20] (Figure 1). In support, Hajjar et al. [21] reported that a discrete extracellular region of human TLR4 enables recognition of hexaacyl, but not pentaacyl, P. aeruginosa LPS. Further discrimination is performed by MD-2 [22]. The same recognition pattern has been found for all mammals tested except rodents [23].

Evidence that lipid A structure influences the recognition of intact bacteria by host cells came from mutating enzymes that attach secondary acyl chains to the backbone. Somerville et al. [24] found an E. coli mutant that was unable to attach the secondary myristate at position 3′ and could not stimulate human endothelial cells. Having a hexaacyl LPS also enhances other responses to intact bacteria, including the induction of tumor necrosis factor by Salmonella in vivo [25], the initiation of intestine wall inflammation by S. flexneri [26], and the production of IL-8 by bladder epithelial cells infected with E. coli [27]. These and other studies convincingly showed that LPS is the major structure sensed by most host defense cells when they interact with bacteria that produce mucosal lipid A [28].

Although the TLR4-based mechanism for sensing LPS has been highly conserved [29], how it benefits the host is only partly understood. Gastrointestinal epithelial cells evidently do not express TLR4 on their lumenal surfaces under normal in vivo conditions, so it is unlikely that they sense LPS or Gram-negative bacteria in the fecal stream [30]. On the other hand, Rakoff-Nahoum et al. [31] recently found that subepithelial TLR4-dependent sensing protects damaged gut from injury by commensal bacteria. Perhaps the key function of this system is to sense bacteria as they enter submucosae, thus mobilizing defenses that confine bacterial invasion, and the inflammatory response to it, to the local site [32,33]. Shigella invasion through the colonic epithelium prompts intense local inflammation, for example; the fact that Shigella possess hexaacyl LPS may help the host confine infection to the intestine (bacteremia rarely occurs) [26,34]. TLR4-dependent responses to other enteric pathogens may also damage the intestinal wall, yet these bacteria also do not often spread to the bloodstream [35]. Similar local responses may help restrict disease caused by most Haemophilus and Bordetella species to the respiratory tract, most strains of N. gonorrhoeae to the urethral mucosa, and E. coli to the bladder [27]. In contrast, producing heptaacylated LPS may help Salmonellae [11] avoid recognition within the intestinal submucosa and grow in extraintestinal tissues.

Most mucosal Gram-negative bacteria that enter the bloodstream are rapidly killed. In many instances, LPS sensing is required for effective elimination [32,36]. Few Gram-negative bacteria grow to high density in the blood of immunocompetent humans [37]; of these, Y. pestis [38] and B. pseudomallei [39] produce lipid A structures that are poorly sensed by TLR4 [40–42]. As suggested by others [29,40,42], these bacteria may be effective human pathogens, at least in part, because the TLR4 mechanism does not recognize them. This notion may also apply to other bacteria that lack the mucosal lipid A structure and are weak TLR4 agonists: F. tularensis [43,44], L. pneumophila [45], C. burnetti [46], H. pylori [47], Brucellae [48,49], and Leptospira [50] species. According to this hypothesis, engineering these bacteria to produce mucosal lipid A should alter their ability to cause disease.

The most obvious exceptions are the pathogenic Neisseriae. Both N. meningitidis and N. gonorrhoeae produce a mucosal lipid A and colonize mucosal surfaces. How they invade the bloodstream is not known [51], but they usually seem to do so without triggering local inflammation. They illustrate the important point that the lipid A–TLR4 interaction is but one element of the confrontation between bacterial pathogen and animal host.

Destroying the Signal: Acyloxyacyl Hydrolysis

Whereas Dictyostelium discoideum produces several lipid A–deacylating enzymes, only one has been found in mammals. Acyloxyacyl hydrolase (AOAH) removes only the secondary chains from lipid A; it cleaves saturated, short secondary chains, as are found in the mucosal lipid A structure, more rapidly than it removes long unsaturated ones [52,53]. A phylogenetic analysis revealed high conservation for both the AOAH large subunit, which has the bacterial GDSL lipase motif [54], and the small subunit, a member of the saposin-like protein family [55] and the likely LPS recognition motif (Figure 2). Indeed, AOAH has evidently been more highly conserved than has TLR4 [29]

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 2. AOAH Phylogenetic Tree

Topological algorithm derived using DisplayFam [69] analysis of available sequences. Amino acid similarity/identity to the full-length human sequence is shown (includes both subunits and the pro-peptide). AOAH-like sequences have not been found in fish or insects. The asterisk indicates that AOAH-like enzymatic activity has been demonstrated in one or more cell types. See Table S2 for accession numbers.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.0020067.g002

In vertebrates, AOAH is produced by neutrophils, dendritic cells, renal cortical epithelial cells, and monocyte-macrophages. AOAH treatment greatly reduces LPS sensing via TLR4 [52], and LPS may remain stimulatory for weeks in mice that cannot deacylate it [56]. AOAH thus can limit inflammatory responses to bacteria that produce mucosal lipid A. Deacylation occurs slowly, reaching completion after the early recognition phase of antibacterial innate immunity has occurred.

Other Signals

The host response to LPS also has noninflammatory, immunostimulatory elements. Lipid A analogs that lack the optimal configuration for inducing inflammation may be excellent adjuvants, enhancing acquired immune responses in ways that mimic those induced by LPS itself [57,58]. The mucosal lipid A motif triggers inflammation (and toxicity), whereas adjuvanticity may also follow TLR4-based recognition of lipid A molecules that have only one phosphate and secondary chains of various lengths, numbers, and/or configurations. These structure–function relationships have been exploited to produce analogs that are either LPS antagonists or nontoxic adjuvants.

LPS recognition by CD14–MD-2–TLR4 has received intensive study because it initiates the inflammatory response to so many disease-associated Gram-negative bacteria. Less is known about how animals sense their far more abundant flora of strictly anaerobic Gram-negative bacteria, although doing so may be important for establishing beneficial mutualism between bacteria and host [59,60]. Like the tetraacylated LPS of Porphyromonas gingivalis, the pentaacylated monophosphoryl LPS of Bacteroides fragilis seems to be sensed principally by TLR2 [61–63] and can inhibit recognition of mucosal LPS by TLR4 [64,65].

Conclusions

An immune system that only recognizes pathogens would leave animals vulnerable to the commensal and colonizing microbes that enter subepithelial tissues at sites of microtrauma throughout life [31]. An innate defense that detects and responds to mucosal commensals as well as pathogens is obviously not impenetrable, however; even commensals may induce damaging responses when host defenses are impaired by trauma, cuts, or tubes that provide conduits across epithelia, immunosuppression, or an inherited immune defect [29,66]. An even greater gap in host defense may be exposed when a Gram-negative pathogen evades TLR4 recognition by producing a nonmucosal lipid A.

If the synthesis proposed here is correct, it would not be surprising to learn that other elements of innate immunity also sense commensal microbes. Animals may also have conserved enzymatic mechanisms for extinguishing microbial signals that are sensed via other receptors [67,68].

Supporting Information

Table S1. Lipid A Structures of Various Gram-Negative Bacterial LPSs

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.0020067.st001

(208 KB DOC)

Table S2. GenBank and Ensemble Accession Numbers Used

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.0020067.st002

(25 KB DOC)

Accession Numbers

The SwissProt (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/swissprot) primary accession numbers discussed in this paper are AOAH (P28039), CD14 (P08571), MD-2 (Q9Y6Y9), and TLR4 (000206).

Acknowledgments

We thank Borna Mehrad, Lora Hooper, Stefanie Vogel, Mingfang Lu, and Richard Kitchens for very helpful criticism.

Author Contributions

RSM and AWV analyzed the data and wrote the paper.

References

  1. 1. Janeway CA Jr (1989) Approaching the asymptote? Evolution and revolution in immunology. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 54: 1–13.
  2. 2. Pirofski LA, Casadevall A (2002) The meaning of microbial exposure, infection, colonisation, and disease in clinical practice. Lancet Infect Dis 2: 628–635.
  3. 3. Dommett R, Zilbauer M, George JT, Bajaj-Elliott M (2005) Innate immune defence in the human gastrointestinal tract. Mol Immunol 42: 903–912.
  4. 4. Guo L, Lim KB, Poduke CM, Daniel M, Gunn JS, et al. (1998) Lipid A acylation and bacterial resistance against vertebrate antimicrobial peptides. Cell 95: 189–198.
  5. 5. Preston A, Maxim E, Toland E, Pishko EJ, Harvill ET, et al. (2003) Bordetella bronchiseptica PagP is a Bvg-regulated lipid A palmitoyl transferase that is required for persistent colonization of the mouse respiratory tract. Mol Microbiol 48: 725–736.
  6. 6. Starner TD, Swords WE, Apicella MA, McCray PB Jr (2002) Susceptibility of nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae to human β-defensins is influenced by lipooligosaccharide acylation. Infect Immun 70: 5287–5289.
  7. 7. Swords WE, Chance DL, Cohn LA, Shao JQ, Apicella MA, et al. (2002) Acylation of the lipooligosaccharide of Haemophilus influenzae and colonization: An htrB mutation diminishes the colonization of human airway epithelial cells. Infect Immun 70: 4661–4668.
  8. 8. Post DMB, Phillips NJ, Shao JQ, Entz DD, Gibson BW, et al. (2002) Intracellular survival of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in male urethral epithelial cells: Importance of a hexaacyl lipid A. Infect Immun 70: 909–920.
  9. 9. Ernst RK, Yi EC, Guo L, Lim KB, Burns JL, et al. (1999) Specific lipopolysaccharide found in cystic fibrosis airway Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Science 286: 1561–1565.
  10. 10. Yoon JW, Lim JY, Park YH, Hovde CJ (2005) Involvement of the Escherichia coli O157:H7(pO157) ecf operon and lipid A myristoyl transferase activity in bacterial survival in the bovine gastrointestinal tract and bacterial persistence in farm water troughs. Infect Immun 73: 2367–2378.
  11. 11. Guo L, Lim KB, Gunn JS, Bainbridge B, Darveau RP, et al. (1997) Regulation of lipid A modifications by Salmonella typhimurium virulence genes phoP–phoQ. Science 276: 250–253.
  12. 12. Guina T, Yi EC, Wang H, Hackett M, Miller SI (2000) A PhoP-regulated outer membrane protease of Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium promotes resistance to alpha-helical antimicrobial peptides. J Bacteriol 182: 4077–4086.
  13. 13. Rosenberger CM, Gallo RL, Finlay BB (2004) Interplay between antibacterial effectors: A macrophage antimicrobial peptide impairs intracellular Salmonella replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 2422–2427.
  14. 14. Moreno E, Stackebrandt E, Dorsch M, Wolters J, Busch M, et al. (1990) Brucella abortus 16S rRNA and lipid A reveal a phylogenetic relationship with members of the alpha-2 subdivision of the class Proteobacteria. J Bacteriol 172: 3569–3576.
  15. 15. Takahashi I, Kotani S, Takada H, Tsujimoto M, Ogawa T, et al. (1987) Requirement of a properly acylated beta(1–6)-d-glucosamine disaccharide bisphosphate structure for efficient manifestation of full endotoxic and associated bioactivities of lipid A. Infect Immun 65: 57–68.
  16. 16. Kotani S, Takada H, Tsujimoto M, Ogawa T, Harada K, et al. (1984) Immunobiologically active lipid A analogs synthesized according to a revised structural model of natural lipid A. Infect Immun 45: 293–296.
  17. 17. Takada H, Kotani S, Tanaka S, Ogawa T, Takahashi I, et al. (1988) Structural requirements of lipid A species in activation of clotting enzymes from the horseshoe crab, and the human complement cascade. Eur J Biochem 175: 573–580.
  18. 18. Kanegasaki S, Kojima Y, Matsuura M, Homma JY, Yamamoto A, et al. (1984) Biological activities of analogues of lipid A based chemically on the revised structural model. Eur J Biochem 143: 237–242.
  19. 19. Galanos C, Lehmann V, Luderitz O, Rietschel ET, Westphal O, et al. (1984) Endotoxic properties of chemically synthesized lipid A part structures. Eur J Biochem 140: 221–227.
  20. 20. Galanos C, Luderitz O, Rietschel ET, Westphal O, Brade H, et al. (1985) Synthetic and natural Escherichia coli free lipid A express identical endotoxic activities. Eur J Biochem 148: 1–5.
  21. 21. Hajjar AM, Ernst RK, Tsai JH, Wilson CB, Miller SI (2002) Human Toll-like receptor 4 recognizes host-specific LPS modifications. Nat Immunol 3: 354–359.
  22. 22. Saitoh SI, Akashi S, Yamada T, Tanimura N, Kobayashi M, et al. (2004) Lipid A antagonist, lipid IVa, is distinct from lipid A in interaction with Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)–MD-2 and ligand-induced TLR4 oligomerization. Int Immunol 16: 961–969.
  23. 23. Golenbock DT, Hampton RY, Raetz CRH, Wright SD (1990) Human phagocytes have multiple lipid A–binding sites. Infect Immun 58: 4069–4075.
  24. 24. Somerville JE Jr, Cassiano L, Bainbridge B, Cunningham MD, Darveau RP (1996) A novel Escherichia coli lipid A mutant that produces an antiinflammatory lipopolysaccharide. J Clin Invest 97: 359–365.
  25. 25. Low KB, Ittensohn M, Le T, Platt J, Sodi S, et al. (1999) Lipid A mutant Salmonella with suppressed virulence and TNFα induction retain tumor-targeting in vivo. Nat Biotechnol 17: 37–41.
  26. 26. D'Hauteville H, Khan S, Maskell DJ, Kussak A, Weintraub A, et al. (2002) Two msbB genes encoding maximal acylation of lipid A are required for invasive Shigella flexneri to mediate inflammatory rupture and destruction of the intestinal epithelium. J Immunol 168: 5240–5251.
  27. 27. Backhed F, Normark S, Schweda EK, Oscarson S, Richter-Dahlfors A (2003) Structural requirements for TLR4-mediated LPS signalling: A biological role for LPS modifications. Microbes Infect 5: 1057–1063.
  28. 28. Darveau RP (1998) Lipid A diversity and the innate host response to bacterial infection. Curr Opin Microbiol 1: 36–42.
  29. 29. Miller SI, Ernst RK, Bader MW (2005) LPS, TLR4 and infectious disease diversity. Nat Rev Microbiol 3: 36–46.
  30. 30. Backhed F, Hornef M (2003) Toll-like receptor 4-mediated signaling by epithelial surfaces: Necessity or threat? Microbes Infect 5: 951–959.
  31. 31. Rakoff-Nahoum S, Paglino J, Eslami-Varzaneh F, Edberg S, Medzhitov R (2004) Recognition of commensal microflora by Toll-like receptors is required for intestinal homeostasis. Cell 118: 229–241.
  32. 32. Cross A, Asher L, Seguin M, Yuan L, Kelly N, et al. (1995) The importance of a lipopolysaccharide-initiated, cytokine-mediated host defense mechanism in mice against extraintestinally invasive Escherichia coli. J Clin Invest 96: 676–686.
  33. 33. Collier-Hyams LS, Neish AS (2005) Innate immune relationship between commensal flora and the mammalian intestinal epithelium. Cell Mol Life Sci 62: 1339–1348.
  34. 34. Wennerås C, Ave P, Huerre M, Arondel J, Ulevitch RJ, et al. (2000) Blockade of CD14 increases Shigella-mediated invasion and tissue destruction. J Immunol 164: 3214–3221.
  35. 35. Khan MA, Ma C, Knodler LA, Valdez Y, Rosenberger CM, et al. (2006) Toll-like receptor 4 contributes to colitis development but not to host defense during Citrobacter rodentium infection in mice. Infect Immun 74: 2522–2536.
  36. 36. Khan SA, Everest P, Servos S, Foxwell N, Zahringer U, et al. (1998) A lethal role for lipid A in Salmonella infections. Mol Microbiol 29: 571–579.
  37. 37. Munford RS (2006) Severe sepsis and septic shock: The role of Gram-negative bacteremia. Annu Rev Pathol Mech Dis 1: 467–496.
  38. 38. Butler T, Levin J, Linh NN, Chau DM, Adickman M, et al. (1976) Yersinia pestis infection in Vietnam. II. Quantiative blood cultures and detection of endotoxin in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with meningitis. J Infect Dis 133: 493–499.
  39. 39. Walsh AL, Smith MD, Wuthiekanun V, Suputtamongkol Y, Chaowagul W, et al. (1995) Prognostic significance of quantitative bacteremia in septicemic melioidosis. Clin Infect Dis 21: 1498–1500.
  40. 40. Rebeil R, Ernst RK, Gowen BB, Miller SI, Hinnebusch BJ (2004) Variation in lipid A structure in the pathogenic yersiniae. Mol Microbiol 52: 1363–1373.
  41. 41. Matsuura M, Kawahara K, Ezaki T, Nakano M (1996) Biological activities of lipopolysaccharide of Burkholderia (Pseudomonas) pseudomallei. FEMS Microbiol Lett 137: 79–83.
  42. 42. Kawahara K, Tsukano H, Watanabe H, Lindner B, Matsuura M (2002) Modification of the structure and activity of lipid A in Yersinia pestis lipopolysaccharide by growth temperature. Infect Immun 70: 4092–4098.
  43. 43. Phillips NJ, Schilling B, McLendon MK, Apicella MA, Gibson BW (2004) Novel modification of lipid A of Francisella tularensis. Infect Immun 72: 5340–5348.
  44. 44. Ancuta P, Pedron T, Girard R, Sandstrom G, Chaby R (1996) Inability of the Francisella tularensis lipopolysaccharide to mimic or to antagonize the induction of cell activation by endotoxins. Infect Immun 64: 2041–2046.
  45. 45. Neumeister B, Faigle M, Sommer M, Zähringer U, Stelter F, et al. (1998) Low endotoxic potential of Legionella pneumophila lipopolysaccharide due to failure of interaction with the monocyte lipopolysaccharide receptor CD14. Infect Immun 66: 4151–4157.
  46. 46. Hackstadt T (1990) The role of lipopolysaccharides in the virulence of Coxiella burnetii. Ann NY Acad Sci 590: 27–32.
  47. 47. Muotiala A, Helander IM, Pyhälä L, Kosunen TU, Moran AP (1992) Low biological activity of Helicobacter pylori lipopolysaccharide. Infect Immun 60: 1714–1716.
  48. 48. Goldstein J, Hoffman T, Frasch C, Lizzio EF, Beining PR, et al. (1992) Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from Brucella abortus is less toxic than that from Escherichia coli, suggesting the possible use of B. abortus or LPS from B. abortus as a carrier in vaccines. Infect Immun 60: 1385–1389.
  49. 49. Duenas AI, Orduna A, Crespo MS, Garcia-Rodriguez C (2004) Interaction of endotoxins with Toll-like receptor 4 correlates with their endotoxic potential and may explain the proinflammatory effect of Brucella spp. LPS. Int Immunol 16: 1467–1475.
  50. 50. Nahori MA, Fournie-Amazouz E, Que-Gewirth NS, Balloy V, Chignard M, et al. (2005) Differential TLR recognition of leptospiral lipid A and lipopolysaccharide in murine and human cells. J Immunol 175: 6022–6031.
  51. 51. Merrell DS, Falkow S (2004) Frontal and stealth attack strategies in microbial pathogenesis. Nature 430: 250–256.
  52. 52. Erwin AL, Munford RS (1990) Deacylation of structurally diverse lipopolysaccharides by human acyloxyacyl hydrolase. J Biol Chem 265: 16444–16449.
  53. 53. Munford RS, Hunter JP (1992) Acyloxyacyl hydrolase, a leukocyte enzyme that deacylates bacterial lipopolysaccharides, has phospholipase, lysophospholipase, diacylglycerollipase, and acyltransferase activities in vitro. J Biol Chem 267: 10116–10121.
  54. 54. Upton C, Buckley JT (1995) A new family of lipolytic enzymes? Trends Biochem Sci 20: 178–179.
  55. 55. Munford RS, Sheppard PO, O'Hara PJ (1995) Saposin-like proteins (SAPLIP) carry out diverse functions on a common backbone structure. J Lipid Res 36: 1653–1663.
  56. 56. Lu M, Zhang M, Takashima A, Weiss J, Apicella MA, et al. (2005) Lipopolysaccharide deacylation by an endogenous lipase controls innate antibody responses to Gram-negative bacteria. Nat Immunol 6: 989–994.
  57. 57. Van der Ley P, Steeghs L, Hamstra HJ, ten Hove J, Zomer B, et al. (2001) Modification of lipid A biosynthesis in Neisseria meningitidis lpxL mutants: Influence on lipopolysaccharide structure, toxicity, and adjuvant activity. Infect Immun 69: 5981–5990.
  58. 58. Persing DH, Coler RN, Lacy MJ, Johnson DA, Baldridge JR, et al. (2002) Taking toll: Lipid A mimetics as adjuvants and immunomodulators. Trends Microbiol 10: S32–S37.
  59. 59. Hooper LV, Gordon JI (2001) Commensal host–bacterial relationships in the gut. Science 292: 1115–1118.
  60. 60. Mazmanian SK, Liu CH, Tzianabos AO, Kasper DL (2005) An immunomodulatory molecule of symbiotic bacteria directs maturation of the host immune system. Cell 122: 107–118.
  61. 61. Darveau RP, Pham TT, Lemley K, Reife RA, Bainbridge BW, et al. (2004) Porphyromonas gingivalis lipopolysaccharide contains multiple lipid A species that functionally interact with both Toll-like receptors 2 and 4. Infect Immun 72: 5041–5051.
  62. 62. Erridge C, Pridmore A, Eley A, Stewart J, Poxton IR (2004) Lipopolysaccharides of Bacteroides fragilis, Chlamydia trachomatis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa signal via Toll-like receptor 2. J Med Microbiol 53: 735–740.
  63. 63. Mancuso G, Midiri A, Biondo C, Beninati C, Gambuzza M, et al. (2005) Bacteroides fragilis–derived lipopolysaccharide produces cell activation and lethal toxicity via Toll-like receptor 4. Infect Immun 73: 5620–5627.
  64. 64. Coats SR, Reife RA, Bainbridge BW, Pham TT, Darveau RP (2003) Porphyromonas gingivalis lipopolysaccharide antagonizes Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide at Toll-like receptor 4 in human endothelial cells. Infect Immun 71: 6799–6807.
  65. 65. Magnuson DK, Weintraub A, Pohlman TH, Maier RV (1989) Human endothelial cell adhesiveness for neutrophils, induced by Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide in vitro, is inhibited by Bacteroides fragilis lipopolysaccharide. J Immunol 143: 3025–3030.
  66. 66. Munford RS, Pugin J (2001) Normal responses to injury prevent systemic inflammation and can be immunosuppressive. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 163: 316–321.
  67. 67. Okabe Y, Kawane K, Akira S, Taniguchi T, Nagata S (2005) Toll-like receptor-independent gene induction program activated by mammalian DNA escaped from apoptotic DNA degradation. J Exp Med 202: 1333–1339.
  68. 68. Bischoff V, Vignal C, Duvic B, Boneca IG, Hoffman JA, et al. (2006) Downregulation of the Drosophila immune response by peptidoglycan-recognition proteins SC1 and SC2. PLoS Pathog 2: e14.. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.0020014.
  69. 69. Corpet F, Gouzy J, Kahn D (1999) Browsing protein families via the ‘Rich Family Description' format. Bioinformatics 15: 1020–1027.