Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-24hb2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T01:00:50.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Screening for Tuberculosis Infection Using Whole-Blood Interferon-γ and Mantoux Testing Among Japanese Healthcare Workers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Nobuyuki Harada*
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Tuberculosis, Japan Anti-Tuberculosis Association, Tokyo, Japan
Yutsuki Nakajima
Affiliation:
Fukujuji Hospital, Japan Anti-Tuberculosis Association, Tokyo, Japan National Hospital Organization, Kitasato University, Tokyo, Japan
Kazue Higuchi
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Tuberculosis, Japan Anti-Tuberculosis Association, Tokyo, Japan
Yukie Sekiya
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Tuberculosis, Japan Anti-Tuberculosis Association, Tokyo, Japan Laboratory of Immunoregulation, Kitasato Institute for Life Science, Kitasato University, Tokyo, Japan
Jim Rothel
Affiliation:
Cellestis, Carnegie, Australia
Toru Mori
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Tuberculosis, Japan Anti-Tuberculosis Association, Tokyo, Japan Leprosy Research Center, National Institute of Infections Diseases, Tokyo, Japan
*
Immunology Division, Research Institute of Tuberculosis, Japan Anti-Tuberculosis Association, 3-1-24, Matsuyama, Kiyose, Tokyo 204-8533, Japan (harada@jata.or.jp)

Abstract

Objective.

To examine the hypothesis that results of the QuantiFERON-TB Gold assay (QFT-G), a whole-blood test for detection of tuberculosis infection, are more significantly related to known risk factors for tuberculosis infection in healthcare workers (HCWs) who have received bacille Calmette-Guerin vaccine than are results of the Mantoux tuberculin skin test (TST).

Design.

All HCWs (approximately 510) from a 370-bed general hospital in Tokyo where patients with and patients without tuberculosis are treated were invited to participate in the study. All study participants completed a questionnaire about their Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection risk factors as HCWs at the general hospital. They were then tested for LTBI by means of the QFT-G, followed by the TST. Statistical analyses were performed to compare results of each test with M. tuberculosis infection risk factors (age, length of employment in the healthcare industry, history of working with tuberculosis-positive patients in a tuberculosis ward or in the outpatient department of the hospital's tuberculosis clinic for more than 1 year, chest radiograph evidence of healed tuberculosis, history of performing bronchoscope procedures, and job classification), and for TST-positive HCWs, to compare the QFT-G result with the TST induration diameter.

Results.

A total of 332 HCWs (95% of whom had been vaccinated with BCG) participated in the study, and 33 had positive QFT-G results, suggesting a prevalence of LTBI of 9.9%. Of 304 HCWs who underwent TST, 283 (93.1%) had an induration diameter of 10 mm or more. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that positive QFT-G results were significantly associated with age and with a history of working in a tuberculosis ward or an outpatient department of a tuberculosis clinic. TST results were not correlated with any of the tuberculosis infection risk factors we evaluated.

Conclusions.

Positive QFT-G results were closely associated with the presence of risk factors for LTBI in a hospital setting, suggesting that the QFT-G can detect LTBI in a population composed predominately of BCG vaccinees. Because most HCWs worldwide have been vaccinated with BCG, the QFT-G offers a significant improvement over the TST in tuberculosis screening programs and minimizes un-warranted use of tuberculosis prophylaxis.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Sepkowitz, KA. Tuberculosis and the health care worker: a historical perspective. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120:7179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Yamauchi, Y. Tuberculosis risk of female nurses based on the Tuberculosis Surveillance Data [in Japanese]. Kekkaku 1999; 74:819821.Google Scholar
3.Barrett-Connor, E. The epidemiology of tuberculosis in physicians. JAMA 1979; 241:3338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Brennen, C, Muder, RR, Muraca, PW. Occult endemic tuberculosis in a chronic care facility. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1988; 9:548552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Goldman, KP. Tuberculosis in hospital doctors. Tubercle 1988; 69:237240.Google Scholar
6.Catanzaro, A. Nosocomial tuberculosis. Am Rev Respir Dis 1982; 125:559562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Ehrenkranz, NJ, Kicklighter, JL. Tuberculosis outbreak in a general hospital: evidence of airborne spread of infection. Ann Intern Med 1972; 77:377382.Google Scholar
8.Haley, CE, McDonald, RC, Rossi, L, Jones, WD Jr, Haley, RW, Luby, JP. Tuberculosis epidemic among hospital personnel. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1989; 10:204210.Google Scholar
9.Kantor, HS, Poblete, R, Pusateri, SL. Nosocomial transmission of tuberculosis from unsuspected disease. Am J Med 1988; 84:833838.Google Scholar
10.Snider, DE Jr, Dooley, SW. Nosocomial tuberculosis in the AIDS era with an emphasis on multidrug-resistant disease. Heart Lung 1993; 22:365369.Google Scholar
11.Jarvis, WR. Nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Res Microbiol 1993; 144:117122.Google Scholar
12.Jereb, JA, Klevens, RM, Privett, TD, et al. Tuberculosis in health care workers at a hospital with an outbreak of MDR Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Arch Intern Med 1995; 155:854859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Edwards, PQ, Edwards, LB. Story of the tuberculin skin test from an epidemiologic viewpoint. Am Rev Respir Dis 1960; 81:147.Google Scholar
14.Judson, FN, Feldman, RA. Mycobacterial skin tests in humans 12 years after infection with Mycobacterium marinum. Am Rev Respir Dis 1974; 109:544547.Google ScholarPubMed
15.Snider, DE Jr. Bacille Calmette-Guérin vaccinations and tuberculin skin tests. JAMA 1985; 253:34383439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Huebner, RE, Schein, MF, Bass, JB Jr. The tuberculin skin test. Clin Infect Dis 1993; 17:968975.Google Scholar
17.Andersen, P, Munk, ME, Pollock, JM, Doherty, TM. Specific immune based diagnosis of tuberculosis. Lancet 2000; 356:10991104.Google Scholar
18.Mori, T, Sakatani, M, Yamagishi, F, et al. Specific detection of tuberculosis infection. An interferon-γ-based assay using new antigens. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004; 170:5964.Google Scholar
19.Brock, I, Weldingh, K, Lillebaek, T, Follmann, F, Andersen, P. Comparison of tuberculin skin test and new specific blood test in tuberculosis contacts. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004; 170:6569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Harada, N, Mori, T, Shishido, S, Higuchi, K, Sekiya, Y. Usefulness of a novel diagnostic method of tuberculosis infection, QuantiFERON-TB-2G, in an outbreak of tuberculosis [in Japanese, with an abstract and tables and figures in English]. Kekkaku 2004; 79:637643.Google Scholar
21.Kang, YA, Lee, HW, Yoon, HI, et al. Discrepancy between the tuberculin skin test and the whole-blood interferon gamma assay for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in an intermediate tuberculosis-burden country. JAMA 2005; 293:27562761.Google Scholar
22.Maeda, M, Asami, N, Murohashi, T. Further studies on the potency of purified protein derivatives of tuberculin (PPDs). First report: comparison of the potency of three preparations of PPD [in Japanese]. Kekkaku 1960; 35:563566.Google Scholar
23.Pai, M, Riley, LW, Colford, JM Jr. Interferon-γ assays in the immunodiagnosis of tuberculosis: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis 2004; 4:761776.Google Scholar
24.Mori, T. Recent trends in tuberculosis, Japan. Emerging Infect Dis 2000; 6:566568.Google Scholar
25.Pai, M, Gokhale, K, Joshi, R, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in health care workers in rural India: comparison of a whole-blood interferon gamma assay with tuberculin skin testing. JAMA 2005; 293:27462755.Google Scholar
26.Karalliedde, S, Katugaha, LP, Uragoda, CG: Tuberculin response of Sri Lankan children after BCG vaccination at birth. Tubercle 1987; 68:3338.Google Scholar
27.Menzies, R, Vissandjee, B, Rocher, I, St Germain, Y. The booster effect in two-step tuberculin testing among young adults in Montreal. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120:190198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed