Articles
Two-step tuberculin testing of passengers and crew on a commercial airplane*

Presented in part at the American Academy of Family Physicians 50th Annual Scientific Assembly, September 16-20, 1998, San Francisco, Calif.
https://doi.org/10.1067/mic.2000.103555Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives: We investigated the risk of tuberculosis transmission from a person with highly infectious pulmonary tuberculosis to fellow passengers and crew members on a 14-hour commercial flight. The 2-step tuberculin testing was used to minimize the effects of the booster phenomenon. Methods: Passengers and flight crew members identified from airline records were contacted by letter, telephone, or both to notify them of their potential exposure to Mycobacterium tuberculosis . The subjects were advised to undergo Mantoux tuberculin skin testing within the required time period to assess a conversion. In addition, information regarding tuberculosis history and other sources of potential exposure was solicited by means of a questionnaire. Results: Of the 277 passengers and crew members on the aircraft, 225 (81.2%) responded. Of these, 173 (76.9%) had positive tuberculin results on the first test (induration > 10 mm). Thirteen subjects with negative results refused further testing; 11 (28%) of the remaining 39 exhibited the booster phenomenon on the second test. Subjects who exhibited the booster phenomenon were significantly more likely to have received previous BCG vaccination. Nine contacts with negative results on the initial test had positive results on a third test administered at 12 weeks after the flight exposure Of these, 6 contacts had previous BCG vaccination, old tuberculosis, or a family member with tuberculosis; the remaining 3 reported on other risk factors for positive reactions. None of these 3 contacts had sat in the same section of the plan as the index patient. Conclusions: The 2-step tuberculin testing procedure is an effective tool for minimization of the booster effect, thus allowing accurate monitoring of subsequent tuberculin conversion rates. Moreover, the clustering of tuberculin skin test conversions among passengers in this study demonstrates the possible risk of M tuberculosis transmission during air travel. (AJIC Am J Infect Control 2000;28:233-8)

Section snippets

Methods

In October 1997, a US county health department notified the Taiwan Ministry of Foreign Affairs that highly infectious TB had been diagnosed in a passenger on a commercial airplane flight in September 1997. The index patient was a 44-year-old Taiwanese woman who, according to her physician in the county health department, had been receiving anti-TB medication for approximately 1 month at the time of the flight. Hospital evaluation revealed extensive pulmonary disease with cavitary lesions (Fig

Results

Of the 308 passenger and crew contacts on the flight, 31 (10.1 percent) were not notified; 25 of these were not residents of Taiwan, and the other 6 could not be located. The remaining 277 contacts (89.9%) resided in Taiwan and were notified of their possible exposure; of these, 225 (81.2%) responded. One hundred seventy-three subjects (76.9%) had positive tuberculin skin test results on initial testing (Table 1).Of the remaining 52 subjects, 39 received second tuberculin skin tests (the other

Discussion

It is now reasonably certain that TB is acquired through inhalation of tubercle bacilli in aerosolized respiratory secretions from infectious persons who talk, cough, or sneeze. A single cough or 5 minutes of talking by such a person may produce 3000 infectious units.10 The incident described here provided opportunities for investigation of the transmission of M tuberculosis on an airplane and further exploration of this concept of transmission. Our investigation was the first to use 2-step

References (27)

  • JW McFarland et al.

    Exposure to M. tuberculosis during air travel

    Lancet

    (1993)
  • A Rouillon et al.

    Transmission of tubercle bacilli: the effects of chemotherapy

    Tubercle

    (1976)
  • KA Sepkowitz et al.

    Benefit of two-step PPD testing of new employees at a New York City hospital

    Am J Infect Control

    (1997)
  • PJ Dolin et al.

    Global tuberculosis incidence and mortality during 1990-2000

    Bull World Health Organ

    (1994)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

    Exposure of passengers and flight crew to Mycobacterium tuberculosis on commercial aircraft, 1992-1995

    MMWR

    (1995)
  • CR Driver et al.

    Transmission of M. tuberculosis associated with air travel

    JAMA

    (1994)
  • TA Kenyon et al.

    Transmission of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis during a long airplane flight

    N Engl J Med

    (1996)
  • MA Miller et al.

    Assessing tuberculin skin test conversion after exposure to tuberculosis on airplanes [abstract 1104]

  • RE Huebner et al.

    Tuberculin skin testing and the HIV epidemic [editorial]

    JAMA

    (1992)
  • JA Sbarbaro

    Skin testing in the diagnosis of tuberculosis

    Semin Respir Infect

    (1986)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

    Draft guidelines for preventing transmission of tuberculosis in health-care facilities

    Federal Register

    (1993)
  • WW Stead

    Tuberculosis among elderly persons: an outbreak in a nursing home

    Ann Intern Med

    (1981)
  • CM Nolan et al.

    An outbreak of tuberculosis in a shelter for homeless men: a description of its evolution and control

    Am Rev Respir Dis

    (1991)
  • Cited by (30)

    • Assessing microbial decontamination of indoor air with particular focus on human pathogenic viruses

      2016, American Journal of Infection Control
      Citation Excerpt :

      The most studied setting has been the cabins of aircraft, where air contamination is a major concern.63 Several studies have reported transmission of infectious agents during aircraft flights, including influenza,64 measles,65 tuberculosis,66 and severe acute respiratory syndrome.67 Concentrations of selected contaminants in the cabin air of Airbus aircrafts were analyzed, and high-efficiency air filtration, coupled with fresh air dilution, was implemented.

    • Flight related tuberculosis contact investigations in the United States: Comparative risk and economic analysis of alternate protocols

      2014, Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
      Citation Excerpt :

      Because of incomplete cohort data collected and reported to CDC, a fixed rate of in-flight M. tuberculosis transmission could not be determined from our data set [11]. Similarly, definitive transmission rates have not been published elsewhere [8,12,19–28]. Given these limitations, we estimated a range of transmission risk by assuming that at the low end, only passenger-contacts with TB screening test conversions (negative results when tested <8 weeks after the flight exposure and positive results when retested ≥8 weeks after exposure) had been infected during the flight, and that at the high end, all passenger-contacts with positive screening test results had been infected during the flight.

    • Tuberculosis and air travel: a systematic review and analysis of policy

      2010, The Lancet Infectious Diseases
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the few cases in which transmission cannot be excluded (table 1), all index patients had infectious tuberculosis. Four studies provided evidence of conversion of tuberculin skin test with a total of ten contacts (table 2) in these incidents having unexplained conversion.11,12,15,16 One of these unexplained conversions involved passengers from Taiwan where incidence of tuberculosis is high and boosting of previous infection by the initial tuberculin skin test might explain the conversion noted,16 and one12 showed transmission between crew members who might have been exposed to each other outside the aircraft.

    • Tuberculosis and air travel: WHO guidance in the era of drug-resistant TB

      2008, Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
      Citation Excerpt :

      These studies provide the evidence base for the WHO recommendations (1998 and 2006) on contact tracing following incidents involving exposure to passengers with infectious TB on board aircraft, limiting the scope of contact investigations to (i) incidents involving flights over 8 h duration (ii) initiated not more than 3 months after the flight and (iii) only for passengers seated in the same row and two rows in front and behind the index case (five rows), and crew working in the same cabin area. Subsequent published individual case reports of infectious TB in passengers on long-haul flights7–11 have also indicated that the risk of transmission of infection on board is probably low, as well as confirming the difficulties involved in carrying out contact investigations. The published cases of TB during air travel have been reviewed in more detail.18

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    *

    Reprint requests: Pair Dong Wang, Deputy Superintendent, Taipei Municipal Chronic Disease Hospital, No. 530, Lin-Shan N. Road, Taipei, Taiwan.

    View full text