Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical practice guidelines in practice and education

  • Keeping Clinically Up-to-Date
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Eddy DM. A Manual for Assessing Health Practices and Designing Practice Policies: The Explicit Approach. Philadelphia, Pa: American College of Physicians; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Woolf SH. Practice guidelines, a new reality in medicine, II: methods for developing guidelines. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:946–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ferguson JH. NIH Consensus Conferences: dissemination and impact. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1993;703:180–99.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferguson JH. The NIH Consensus Development Program. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1996;12:460–74.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. American Medical Association: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Technology Assessment. DATTA Procedures. Chicago, Ill: American Medical Association; April 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brook RH, Chassin MR, Fink A, et al. A method for the assessment of the appropriatensess of medical technologies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1986;2:53–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gottieb LK, Sokol HN, Murrey KO, et al. Algorithm-based clinical quality improvement: clinical guidelines and continuous quality improvement. HMO Pract. 1993;6:5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. The Canadian Guide to Clinical Preventive Health Care. Ottawa, Ont: Canada Communication Group; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. 2nd ed. Baltimore, Md: Williams and Wilkins; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eddy DM, ed. Comm on Screening Tests. Philadelphia, Pa: American College of Physicians; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sox HC Jr., ed. Common Diagnostic Tests: Use and Interpretation. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: American College of Physicians; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Institute of Medicine. Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Field MJ, Lohr KN, eds. Guidelines for Clinical Practice: From Development to Use. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Woolf SH. ACHPR Interim Manual for Clinical Practice Guideline Development. Rockville, Md: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research: 1991. AHCPR publication No. 91-0018.

    Google Scholar 

  14. McConnell JD, Barry MJ, Bruskewitz RC, et al. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Diagnosis and Treatment. Clinical Practice Guideline No. 8. Rockville, Md: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; February 1994. AHCPR publication No. 94-0582.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Coley CM, Barry MJ, Fleming C, Fahs MC, Mulley AG. Early detection of prostate cancer. Part II: Estimating the risks, benefits, and costs. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:468–79.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Office of Technology Assessment. Effectiveness and Costs of Osteoporosis Screening and Hormone Replacement Therapy, Vol. II: Evidence on Benefits, Risks, and Costs. Washington, DC: U.S. Congress: August 1995. Publication No. OTA-BP-H-144.

  17. Office of Technology Assessment. Costs and Effectiveness of Prostate Cancer Screening in Elderly Men. Washington, DC: U.S. Congress; May 1995. Publication No. OTA-BP-H-145.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Methods for Setting Prioriti for Guidelines Development. Field MJ, ed. Setting Priorities for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Office of Technology Assessment. Identifying Health Technologies That Work: Searching for Evidence. Washington, DC: U.S. Congress: September 1994. Publication No. OTA-H-608.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Woolf SH, DiGuiseppi CG, Atkins D, et al. Developing evidence-based clinical practice guidelines: lessons learned by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Annu Rev Public Health. 1996;17:511–38.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Battista RN, Fletcher SW. Making recommendations on preventive practices: methodologic issues. Am J Prev Med. 1988;4(suppl): 53–67.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bero L, Rennie D. The Cochrane Collaboration: preparing, maintaining, and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health care. JAMA. 1995;274:1935–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Undertaking Systematic Reviews of Research on Effectiveness: CRD Guidelines for Those Carrying Out or Commissioning Reviews. CRD Report No. 4, January 1996. York, England: University of York: 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Oxman AD, ed. The Cochrane Collaboration Handbook. Section VI: Preparing and Maintaining Systematic Reviews. Oxford, England: Cochrane Collaboration: 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  25. McDonald CJ, Hui SL, Smith DM, et al. Reminders to physicians from an introspective computer medical record. A two-year randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 1984;100:130–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Barnett GO, Winickoff RN, Morgan MM, Žielstorff RD. A computerbased monitoring system for follow-up of elevated blood pressure. Med Care. 1983;21:400–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. McPhee SJ, Bird JA, Fordham D, Rodnick JE, Osborn EH. Promoting cancer prevention activities by primary care physicians. Results of a randomized, controlled trial. JAMA. 1991;266:538–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tierney WM, Hui SL, McDonald CJ. Delayed feelback of physician performance versus immediate reminders to perform preventive care: effects of physician compliance. Med Care. 1986;24:659–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sittig DF, Stead WW. Computer-based physician order entry: the state of the art. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994;1:108–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Overhage JM, Tierney WM, McDonald CJ. Computer-assisted order-writing improves compliance with ordering guidelines. Clin Res. 1993;41:716A. Abstract.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Overhage JM, Tierney WM, McDonald CJ. Computer reminders to implement preventive care guidelines for hospitalized patients. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:1551–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Eddy DM. Designing a practice policy: standards, guidelines, and options. JAMA. 1990;263:3077–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. McDonald CJ. Medical heuristics: the silent adjudicators of clinical practice. Ann Intern Med. 1996:124:56–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Sapira JD. On violating Occam's razor. South Med J. 1991: 84:766.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Guidelines for the evaluation and management of heart failure. Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26:1376–98.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tunis SR, Hayward RS, Wilson MC, et al. Internists' attitudes about clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:956–63.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Heart Failure: Evaluation and Care of Patients with Left-Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1994. AHCPR publication No. 94-0612.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Tierney WM, Overhage JM, Takesue BY, et al. Computerizing guidelines to improve care and patient outcomes: the example of heart failure. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1995;2:316–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. McDonald CJ, Overhage JM. Guidelines you can follow and can trust: an ideal and an example. JAMA. 1994;271:872–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Improving the Medical Record. The Computer-Based Patient Record: An Essential Technology for Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Rind DM, Safran C, Phillips RS, et al. Effect of computer-based alers on the treatment and outcomes of hospitalized patients. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:1511–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Litzelman DK, Tierney WM. Physicians' reasons for failing to comply with computerized preventive care guidelines. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:497–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berg, A.O., Atkins, D. & Tierney, W. Clinical practice guidelines in practice and education. J Gen Intern Med 12 (Suppl 2), S25–S33 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.12.s2.4.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.12.s2.4.x

Keywords

Navigation