Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Using the LMS method to calculate z-scores for the Fenton preterm infant growth chart

Abstract

Objectives:

The use of exact percentiles and z-scores permit optimal assessment of infants’ growth. In addition, z-scores allow the precise description of size outside of the 3rd and 97th percentiles of a growth reference. To calculate percentiles and z-scores, health professionals require the LMS parameters (Lambda for the skew, Mu for the median, and Sigma for the generalized coefficient of variation; Cole, 1990). The objective of this study was to calculate the LMS parameters for the Fenton preterm growth chart (2003).

Design:

Secondary data analysis of the Fenton preterm growth chart data.

Methods:

The Cole methods were used to produce the LMS parameters and to smooth the L parameter. New percentiles were generated from the smooth LMS parameters, which were then compared with the original growth chart percentiles.

Results:

The maximum differences between the original percentile curves and the percentile curves generated from the LMS parameters were: for weight; a difference of 66 g (2.9%) at 32 weeks along the 90th percentile; for head circumference; some differences of 0.3 cm (0.6–1.0%); and for length; a difference of 0.5 cm (1.6%) at 22 weeks on the 97th percentile.

Conclusion:

The percentile curves generated from the smoothed LMS parameters for the Fenton growth chart are similar to the original curves. These LMS parameters for the Fenton preterm growth chart facilitate the calculation of z-scores, which will permit the more precise assessment of growth of infants who are born preterm.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agget PJ, Agostoni C, Alexsson I, De Curtis M, Goulet O, Hernell O et al. (2006). ESPGHAN committee on nutrition: feeding preterm infants after hospital discharge: a commentary by the ESPGHAN committee on nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 42, 596–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole TJ (1990). The LMS method for constructing normalized growth standards. Eur J Clin Nutr 44, 45–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cole TJ (1989). Using the LMS method to measure skewness in the NCHS and Dutch National height standards. Ann Hum Biol 16, 407–419.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cole TJ, Green PJ (1992). Smoothing reference centile curves: the LMS method and penalized likelihood. Stat Med 11, 1305–1319.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Nutrition American Academy Pediatrics (1998). Nutritional Needs of Preterm Infants. American Academy of Pediatrics: Elk Grove Village, Il.

  • Davies PS, Day JM, Cole TJ (1993). Converting Tanner–Whitehouse reference tricep and subscapular skinfold measurements to standard deviation scores. Eur J Clin Nutr 47, 559–566.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fenton TR (2003). A new growth chart for preterm babies: Babson and Benda's chart updated with recent data and a new format. BMC Pediatr 3, 13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgieff MK, Hoffman JS, Pereira GR, Bernbaum J, Hoffman-Williamson M (1985). Effect of neonatal caloric deprivation on head growth and 1-year developmental status in preterm infants. J Pediatr 107, 581–587.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson S, Iliadou A, Bergvall N, Tuvemo T, Norman M, Cnattingius S (2005). Risk of high blood pressure among young men increases with the degree of immaturity at birth. Circulation 112, 3430–3436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latal-Hajnal B, von Siebenthal K, Kovari H, Bucher HU, Largo RH (2003). Postnatal growth in VLBW infants: significant association with neurodevelopmental outcome. J Pediatr 143, 163–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latal-Hajnal B, von Siebenthal K, Kovari H, Bucher HU, Largo RH (2003). Postnatal growth in VLBW infants: significant association with neurodevelopmental outcome. J Pediatr 143, 163–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas A (2005). Long-term programming effects of early nutrition – implications for the preterm infant. J Perinatol 25 (2), S2–S6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas A, Morley R, Cole TJ (1998). Randomised trial of early diet in preterm babies and later intelligence quotient. BMJ 317, 1481–1487.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nutrition Committee Canadian Paediatric Society (1995). Nutrient needs and feeding of premature infants. CMAJ 152, 1765–1785.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Pat Fenton for assistance with the statistical methods.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T R Fenton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fenton, T., Sauve, R. Using the LMS method to calculate z-scores for the Fenton preterm infant growth chart. Eur J Clin Nutr 61, 1380–1385 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602667

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602667

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links