Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Clinical
  • Published:

Lung cancer referral patterns in the former Yorkshire region of the UK

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to find out what proportion of patients are referred as lung cancer guidelines assume, whether different referral pathways result in different management and what proportion of patients are seen within recommended time intervals between referral and treatment. A randomly selected sample of 400 lung cancer cases registered with the former Yorkshire Cancer Registry database in 1993 was selected for casenote analysis. Mode of presentation, speciality of initial referral, treatment by specialist, time intervals for key points in the referral pathways were analyzed. A total of 362 (90.5%) of case-notes were available. Less than half of lung cancer patients (173, 47.8%) presented to hospital with a chest X-ray diagnosis of lung cancer. Forty-one (11.3%) presented as self-referrals to Accident and Emergency and the remainder were referred without a diagnosis of lung cancer by other routes, mainly via GPs. Patients who did not present initially with a lung cancer diagnosis were less likely to receive specialist care (62%:96%), or have their diagnosis histologically confirmed (57.1%:80.3%) or receive surgery or radical radiotherapy (6.9%:13.9%). Nine per cent of all 362 patients did not receive a specialist opinion. Eighty per cent of patients referred by a GP with CXR suspected lung cancer were seen at hospital within 2 weeks. Only 32.4% of those receiving active treatment were treated within 8 weeks of clinical diagnosis or first hospital visit. Lung cancer patients presenting to hospital without a suspicious CXR are less likely to have specialist care, histological confirmation of their cancer and have lower rates of active treatment (surgery, any radiotherapy or chemotherapy).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

References

  • Billing JS, Wells MC (1996) Delays in the diagnosis and surgical treatment of lung cancer. Thorax 51: 903–906

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS, Eraut D, Trask C, Davison AG (1996) Age and the treatment of lung cancer. [see comments]Thorax 51: 6 564–568

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • BTS (1998) The lung cancer working party of the British Thoracic Society (BTS). British Thoracic Society recommendations to respiratory physicians for organising the care of patients with lung cancer. Thorax 53: Suppl 1 1–8

  • Cancer Outcomes Monitoring (1999) Cancer treatment policies and their effects on survival: Lung. Key sites study 2 NYCRIS. (available at www.nycris.org.uk)

  • Cancer Outcomes Monitoring (2000) Lung Cancer Referral Patterns: The Yorkshire Experience NYCRIS (available at www.nycris.org.uk)

  • Crawford SM, Atherton F (1994) Lung cancer: histological aspects of diagnosis in England and the south east Netherlands. J Epi Comm Health 48: 420

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dische S, Gibson D, Parmar M, Saunders MI (1996) Time course from first symptom to treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer referred for radiotherapy: a report by the CHART Steering Committee. Thorax 51: 12 1262–1265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DoH (1997) The New NHS – Modern and Dependable HMSO

  • DoH (1999) Referral guidelines for suspected cancer – consultation document November 1999 Department of Health (DoH)

  • Fergusson RJ, Gregor A, Dodds R, Kerr G (1996) Management of lung cancer in South East Scotland. Thorax 51: 6 569–574

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fergusson RJ, Milroy R, Brown P, Gregor A, Jones R, Stroner PL (1999) Lung cancer in Scotland – Importance of seeing a chest physician. Thorax 54: S3 A34

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregor A, Stroner PL, Davidson, Thomson CS (1999) Lung Cancer in Scotland – the 1995 reality. Br J Cancer 80: S2 15

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregor A, Thomson CS, Brewster DH, Stroner PL, Davidson J, Fergusson RJ, Milroy R on behalf of the Scottish Cancer Trial Lung Group and the Scottish Cancer Therapy Network (2001) Management and survival of lung cancer patients diagnosed in 1995 in Scotland: results of a national, population based study. Thorax 56: 212–217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen-Heijnen MLG, Gatta G, Forman D and the EUROCARE Working group (1998) Variation in survival of patients with lung cancer in Europe, 1985–1989. Eur J Cancer 34: 14 2191–2196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kesson E, Bucknall CE, McAlpine LG, Milroy R, Hole D, Vernon DR, Macbeth F, Gillis CR (1998) Lung cancer–management and outcome in Glasgow, 1991-92. Br J Cancer 78: 10 1391–1395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muers MF, Haward RA (1996) Management of lung cancer. Thorax 51: 557–560

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • NHSE (1998) Guidance on commissioning cancer services: Improving outcomes in lung cancer NHSE

  • Nugent WC, Edney MT, Hammerness PG, Dain BJ, Maurer LH, Rigas JR (1997) Non-small cell lung cancer at the extremes of age: impact on diagnosis and treatment. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 63: 193–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Office for National Statistics (ONS, 1998) 1992 Cancer statistics registrations: England and Wales London: The Stationery Office

  • Pickles H, Rudolf M (1998) Lung cancer: local review of services. Thorax 53: Suppl 3 A57

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson GE, Thursfield VJ, Giles GG (2000) Reported management of lung cancer in Victoria in 1993 – comparison with best practice. Anti-Cancer Council of Victoria Lung Cancer Study Group. Med J Australia 172: 7 321–324

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN, 1998) Management of Lung cancer Edinburgh: SIGN Publication No 23

  • SMAC (1994) Management of lung cancer: current clinical practices (Whitehouse Report) Standing Medical Advisory Committee (SMAC)

  • Spurgeon P, Barwell F, Kerr D (2000) Waiting times for cancer patients in England after General Practitioners' referrals: retrospective national survey. BMJ 320: 838–839

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson SL, Lowe D, Peake MD, Pearson MG on behalf of participating hospitals (1999) RCP Lung cancer audit – Factors associated with poor 6 month survival in non-small cell cancer. Thorax 54: Suppl 3 A14

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner NJ, Haward RA, Mulley GP, Selby PJ (1999) Cancer in old age is it inadequately investigated and treated? BMJ 319: 7205 309–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Mr ME Cowen, Dr M Bond, Dr CK Connolly, Dr D Parker and Dr HR Gribbin for their participation in the study design and Ms Ros Collins for technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A C Hatfield.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Melling, P., Hatfield, A., Muers, M. et al. Lung cancer referral patterns in the former Yorkshire region of the UK. Br J Cancer 86, 36–42 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600029

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600029

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links