Skip to main content
Log in

High breast cancer incidence rates among California teachers: results from the California Teachers Study (United States)

  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To determine risk factor profiles and cancer incidence rates among participants in the California Teachers Study (CTS), a study designed to document high breast cancer incidence rates of California teachers and to investigate emergent hypotheses in the etiology of breast and other cancers. Methods: The CTS is a prospective study of 133,479 California female teachers and administrators, established in 1995–1996 with members of the California State Teachers Retirement System completing a detailed mailed questionnaire regarding possible risk factors for breast and other cancers. Cancer outcomes were identified by linkage with the California Cancer Registry. Results: CTS participants have a 51% higher age-standardized invasive breast cancer incidence rate and a 67% higher in-situ breast cancer incidence rate than would be expected based on race-specific statewide rates after three years of follow-up. CTS participants also have substantially elevated rates of endometrial cancer (rate ratio, RR = 1.72), ovarian cancer (RR = 1.28), melanoma (RR = 1.59), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (RR = 1.53), and leukemia (RR = 1.28), but low rates of invasive cervix cancer (RR = 0.53) and lung cancer (RR = 0.66). Conclusions: CTS members have high rates of several major cancers, particularly breast cancer, and low rates of lung and cervix cancer. Although late age at first birth can explain a portion of the observed excess risk of breast cancer in this cohort, the unique risk factor profile of CTS members may account for much of their higher risk of breast and selected other cancers. The CTS offers a rich resource for future studies of cancer risk and of women's health, in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Reidmiller K, Doebbert G, Lashway N, Rudolph L, Glazer E (1987) California Occupational Mortality 1979–1981. California Department of Health Services Health Demographics Section. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Health Services.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Reynolds P, Elkin EP, Layefsky ME, Lee GM (1999) Cancer in California school employees, 1988–1992. AmJ Ind Med 36: 271–278.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Horn-Ross PL, Hoggatt KJ, West DW, et al. (2001) Recent diet and breast cancer risk: the California Teachers Study. Cancer Causes Control. (In Press).

  4. California Cancer Registry (2000) California Cancer Reporting SystemStandards. Vol. 1, 5th edn. Abstracting and coding procedures for hospitals. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Health Services.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen VW, Howe HL, Wu XC, Hotes JL, Correa CN (2000) 1997–1997. Vol. 1: Incidence. Springfield, IL: North American Association of Central Cancer Registries.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Casagrande JT, Louie EW, Pike MC, Roy S, Ross RK, Henderson BE (1979) ''Incessant ovulation'' and ovarian cancer. Lancet 2: 170–173.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Henderson BE, Ross RK, Judd HL, Krailo MD, Pike MC (1985) Do regular ovulatory cycles increase breast cancer risk? Cancer 56: 1206–1208.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Weiss NS, Cook LS, Farrow DC, Rosenblatt KA (1996) Ovarian cancer. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni J, eds. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 1040–1057.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Henderson BE, Pike MC, Bernstein L, Ross RK (1996) Breast cancer. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni J, eds. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 1022–1039.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grady D, Ernster VL (1996) Endometrial cancer. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni J, eds. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 1058–1089.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ross RK, Paganini-Hill A, Wan PC, Pike MC (2000). Effect of hormone replacement therapy on breast cancer risk: estrogen versus estrogen plus progestin. J Natl Cancer Inst 92: 328–332.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schairer C, Lubin J, Troisi R, Sturgeon S, Brinton L, Hoover R (2000) Menopausal estrogen and estrogen-progestin replacement therapy and breast cancer risk. J AmMed Assoc 283: 485–491.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schiffman MH, Brinton LA, Devessa SS, Fraumeni JF (1996) Cervical cancer. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni J, eds. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 1090–1116.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DB, et al. (1989) Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst 81: 1879–1886.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bernstein, L., Allen, M., Anton-Culver, H. et al. High breast cancer incidence rates among California teachers: results from the California Teachers Study (United States). Cancer Causes Control 13, 625–635 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019552126105

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019552126105

Navigation