Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T16:09:44.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors influencing length of hospital stay in community-acquired pneumonia: a study in 27 community hospitals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2004

M. CABRE ,
I. BOLIVAR ,
G. PERA ,
R. PALLARES  and
M. CABRE
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital de Mataro, Consorci Sanitari del Maresme, Spain
I. BOLIVAR
Affiliation:
Clinical and Epidemiology Research Unit, Hospital de Mataro, Consorci Sanitari del Maresme, Spain
G. PERA
Affiliation:
Clinical and Epidemiology Research Unit, Hospital de Mataro, Consorci Sanitari del Maresme, Spain
R. PALLARES
Affiliation:
Infectious Diseases Service, Clinical Research Unit, Hospital Bellvitge and University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We did a retrospective study of 1920 episodes of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in 27 community hospitals and analysed inter-hospital variability in length of hospital stay (LOS), mortality and readmission rates. The overall adjusted LOS (mean±S.D.) was 10·0±9·8 days. LOS increased according to the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) risk class: 7·3 days for class I to 11·3 days for class V (P<0·001). In a multiple regression model, LOS increased (P<0·001) according to the hospital (inter-hospital variability), PSI risk class, complications during hospitalization, admission to ICU, need of oxygen and transfer to a nursing home. Hospitals with shorter LOS did not show an increased readmission rate (adjusted OR 1·02, 95% CI 0·51–2·03, P=0·97) and post-discharge mortality (adjusted OR 1·20, 95% CI 0·70–2·05, P=0·51). There are significant inter-hospital variations in LOS in patients with CAP which are related to differences in clinical management. The reduction of these differences will further improve efficiency and quality of care.

Type
Research Article
Information
Epidemiology & Infection , Volume 132 , Issue 5 , October 2004 , pp. 821 - 829
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press