Elsevier

Seminars in Immunology

Volume 25, Issue 2, April 2013, Pages 160-171
Seminars in Immunology

Review
Respiratory syncytial virus vaccine development

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smim.2013.04.011Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The burden of disease that justifies RSV vaccine priorities.

  • The rationale for target populations.

  • The approach to developing an RSV vaccine including the proteins most relevant to the vaccine.

  • The types of vaccines and approach to design for the various types.

  • Concepts that may help vaccine development.

Abstract

The importance of RSV as a respiratory pathogen in young children made it a priority for vaccine development shortly after it was discovered. Unfortunately, after over 50 years of vaccine development no vaccine has yet been licensed and it is not certain which if any vaccines being developed will be successful. The first candidate vaccine, a formalin inactivated RSV vaccine (FI-RSV), was tested in children in the 1960s and predisposed young recipients to more serious disease with later natural infection. The ongoing challenges in developing RSV vaccines are balanced by advances in our understanding of the virus, the host immune response to vaccines and infection, and pathogenesis of disease. It seems likely that with efficient and appropriately focused effort a safe and effective vaccine is within reach. There are at least 4 different target populations for an RSV vaccine, i.e. the RSV naïve young infant, the RSV naïve infant >4–6 months of age, pregnant women, and elderly adults. Each target population has different issues related to vaccine development. Numerous vaccines from live attenuated RSV to virus like particle vaccines have been developed and evaluated in animals. Very few vaccines have been studied in humans and studies in humans are needed to determine which vaccines are worth moving toward licensure. Some changes in the approach may improve the efficiency of evaluating candidate vaccines. The complexity of the challenges for developing RSV vaccines suggests that collaboration among academic, government, and funding institutions and industry is needed to most efficiently achieve an RSV vaccine.

Introduction

In 1955, Morris et al. isolated a virus from Chimpanzees, chimpanzee coriza agent [1], and shortly thereafter a similar virus was isolated from young children and designated respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) [2], [3]. The importance of this virus as a cause of acute respiratory illness in young children was quickly recognized and efforts to develop an RSV vaccine began. RSV infections are usually symptomatic and in the young child cause the full spectrum of acute respiratory illnesses including a common cold-like illness, croup, bronchitis, bronchiolitis, and pneumonia [4]. Bronchiolitis, i.e. a lower respiratory tract illness with wheezing, is the signature RSV illness in infants and young children. The virus spreads efficiently and is estimated that 50% of children become infected during their first year of life and nearly 100% by 2 years of age [5]. Since infection provides limited protective immunity, repeat infections and disease occur throughout life. Infants <6 months of age, persons of any age with compromised cardiac, pulmonary and immune systems, and the elderly are especially susceptible to more serious complications with infection [6], [7]. RSV is considered the single most important cause of serious acute respiratory illness in infants and young children world-wide causing an estimated 66,000 to over 200,000 deaths and 3.4 million hospitalizations in children <5 years of age each year [8], [9]. In the United States, it is estimated that between 57,000 and 175,000 children <5 years of age are hospitalized each year with RSV [10], [11], [12]. It is also estimated that RSV is associated with over 500,000 emergency room visits [10] but <500 deaths in children <5 years of age each year in the United States. It also causes substantial disease in elderly persons resulting in an estimated 177,000 hospitalizations and between 10,000 and 15,000 deaths each year in the United States [13], [14], [15]. In temperate climates, most illness occurs in yearly outbreaks in the late fall, winter, and early spring months, e.g. October to April in the northern hemisphere and April to September in the southern hemisphere [16], [17], [18]. Outbreaks often last from 4 to 5 months in a community.

Another potential outcome of RSV infection in the infant is later development of reactive airway disease. Multiple studies have shown that children hospitalized with RSV have a substantially increased risk of having reactive airway or asthma through adolescence [19], [20], [21], [22]. What is still unclear, however, if this occurs because children likely to develop reactive airway disease are also more likely to be hospitalized with RSV and the RSV infection is not causally related to the later reactive airway disease or because infection alters the architecture of the airways or patterns for future immune responses associated with reactive airway disease.

The importance of RSV as a respiratory pathogen in young children made it a priority for vaccine development shortly after it was discovered. Unfortunately, after over 50 years of vaccine development no vaccine has yet been licensed and it is not certain which if any vaccines being developed will be successful. The first candidate vaccine, a formalin inactivated RSV vaccine (FI-RSV), was tested in children in the 1960s and predisposed young recipients to more serious disease with later natural infection [23], [24], [25], [26]. Older children who likely had been previously infected with RSV did not suffer this enhanced disease. It appears that prior infection patterned for a safe immune response to the vaccine and prevented development of enhanced disease. A study in mice showed prior live virus infection prevented enhanced disease in mice later vaccinated with FI-RSV vaccine and challenged with RSV [27]. The experience with FI-RSV continues to effect vaccine development. Because of the FI-RSV trial, only attenuated live RSV or RSV proteins expressed in a live virus vector have, so far, been considered safe for testing in RSV naïve children. Unfortunately, no live attenuated RSV or live virus vectored vaccine has yet been licensed. Since older, RSV primed children are not considered at risk for enhanced disease, a variety of other types of vaccines including purified proteins, virus-like particles (VLPs), nanoparticles, and DNA or vectors expressing RSV proteins are being developed for older children and adults. The efficacy of RSV immune prophylaxis first with polyclonal immune globulin [28] and then a neutralizing, anti-F protein monoclonal antibody shows [29] that an effective RSV vaccine should be achievable.

The ongoing challenges in developing RSV vaccines are balanced by advances in our understanding of the virus, the host immune response to vaccines and infection, and pathogenesis of disease. It seems likely that with efficient and appropriately focused effort a safe and effective vaccine is within reach. A number of recent reviews provide excellent discussions of many aspects of RSV and development of RSV vaccines [30], [31], [32]. In this chapter, I will highlight some less frequently considered strategies that, I believe, may facilitate the quest for an RSV vaccine.

Section snippets

Target populations

Our understanding of the epidemiology and burden of RSV disease now suggests that there are at least 4 potential target populations for a vaccine, the young infant, infants >4–6 months of age, pregnant women, and the elderly. Each of these target populations presents different challenges for vaccine development. The young infant is the target population with the greatest potential benefit from an RSV vaccine. However, the young infant has an immature immune system and residual maternal antibody

Strategies for developing RSV vaccines

Developing an RSV vaccine continues to challenge researchers. Some of these challenges are not surprising giving the clinical and epidemiologic features of the disease. As noted above, the need to vaccinate the very young infant to achieve maximal impact of a vaccine presents the challenge of inducing effective responses in infant's who have an immature immune system and residual maternal antibody and safety of a live virus vaccine in children especially vulnerable to RSV disease. The fact that

Pathogenesis of disease

Studies in animals and in humans show that pathology directly associated with virus replication is not sufficient to explain RSV disease and virus induced inflammatory and immune responses are important contributors to the disease process. A better understanding of the interplay between the virus, especially viral proteins and regions in viral proteins, and the host response should identify new approaches to consider in design of vaccines. I will highlight some aspects of RSV disease

Candidate RSV vaccines

The approach to developing live attenuated RSV vaccines has involved a number of RSV proteins, Table 1, and focused on achieving a virus with replication sufficiently attenuated to be safe in the RSV naïve infant and not too attenuated to eliminate an effective immune response. Strategies to improve immunogenicity of the virus without increasing replication are also being explored. In contrast, development of all other types of vaccines, i.e. non-live RSV vaccines, have most often only involved

Comments

Despite over 50 years of research, no RSV vaccine has yet been shown safe and effective. There are, however, as noted above a plethora of promising vaccines and some may provide the answer for one or more target populations. One of the challenges to moving toward licensure is determining which candidate vaccines are likely to succeed. The present approach, evaluating immunogenicity, anti-viral activity, and disease in animals, i.e. mice then cotton rats and possibly non-human primates, has not

References (192)

  • J.A. Morris et al.

    Recovery of cytopathogenic agent from chimpanzees with coryza (22538)

    Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine

    (1956)
  • R. Chanock et al.

    Recovery from infants with respiratory illness of a virus related to chimpanzee coryza agent (CCA) I. Isolation, properties and characterization

    American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

    (1957)
  • R. Chanock et al.

    Recovery from infants with respiratory illness of a virus related to chimpanzee coryza agent (CCA) II. Epidemiologic aspects of infection in infants and young children

    American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

    (1957)
  • C.B. Hall

    The burgeoning burden of respiratory syncytial virus among children

    Infectious Disorders Drug Targets

    (2012)
  • W.P. Glezen et al.

    Risk of primary infection and reinfection with respiratory syncytial virus

    American Journal of Diseases of Children

    (1986)
  • G. Fischer Langley et al.

    Epidemiology and prevention of respiratory syncytial virus infections among infants and young children

    Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal

    (2011)
  • E.A. Simoes

    Environmental and demographic risk factors for respiratory syncytial virus lower respiratory tract disease

    Journal of Pediatrics

    (2003)
  • C.B. Hall et al.

    The burden of respiratory syncytial virus infection in young children

    New England Journal of Medicine

    (2009)
  • L.J. Stockman et al.

    Respiratory syncytial virus-associated hospitalizations among infants and young children in the United States, 1997–2006

    Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal

    (2012)
  • D.K. Shay et al.

    Bronchiolitis-associated hospitalizations among U.S. children, 1980–1995

    Journal of the American Medical Association

    (1999)
  • A.R. Falsey et al.

    Respiratory syncytial virus infection in elderly and high-risk adults

    New England Journal of Medicine

    (2005)
  • L.L. Han et al.

    Respiratory syncytial virus pneumonia among the elderly: an assessment of disease burden

    Journal of Infectious Diseases

    (1999)
  • W.W. Thompson et al.

    Mortality attributable to influenza and respiratory syncytial virus in the United States, 1990–1998

    Journal of the American Medical Association

    (2003)
  • J.A. Mullins et al.

    Substantial variability in community RSV season timing: an analysis using the National Respiratory and Enteric Viruses Sruveillance System (NREVSS)

    Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal

    (2003)
  • L.G. Stensballe et al.

    Respiratory syncytial virus epidemics: the ups and downs of a seasonal virus

    Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal

    (2003)
  • H.C. Moore et al.

    Seasonality of respiratory viral identification varies with age and aboriginality in metropolitan Western Australia

    Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal

    (2009)
  • N. Sigurs et al.

    Asthma and allergy patterns over 18 years after severe RSV bronchiolitis in the first year of life

    Thorax

    (2010)
  • R.T. Stein et al.

    Respiratory syncytial virus and asthma: still no final answer

    Thorax

    (2010)
  • P. Wu et al.

    Evidence for a causal relationship between respiratory syncytial virus infection and asthma

    Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy

    (2011)
  • H.W. Kim et al.

    Respiratory syncytial virus disease in infants despite prior administration of antigenic inactivated vaccine

    American Journal of Epidemiology

    (1969)
  • A.Z. Kapikian et al.

    An epidemiologic study of altered clinical reactivity to respiratory syncytial (RS) virus infection in children previously vaccinated with an inactivated RS virus vaccine

    American Journal of Epidemiology

    (1969)
  • V.A. Fulginiti et al.

    Respiratory virus immunization: I. A field of two inactivated respiratory virus vaccines; an aqueous trivalent parainfluenza virus vaccine and an alum-precipitated respiratory syncytial virus vaccine

    American Journal of Epidemiology

    (1969)
  • J. Chin et al.

    Field evaluation of a respiratory syncytial virus vaccine and a trivalent parainfluenza virus vaccine in a pediatric population

    American Journal of Epidemiology

    (1969)
  • M.E. Waris et al.

    Priming with live respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prevents enhanced pulmonary inflammatory responses associated with formalin inactivated RSV immunization in BALB/c mice

    Journal of Virology

    (1997)
  • J.R. Groothuis et al.

    Hemming VG, group Trsvigs Prophylactic administration of respiratory syncytial virus immune globulin in high-risk infants and young children

    New England Journal of Medicine

    (1993)
  • A. Mejias et al.

    Review of palivizumab in the prophylaxis of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in high-risk infants

    Biologics: Targets & Therapy

    (2008)
  • J.L. Hurwitz

    Respiratory syncytial virus vaccine development

    Expert Review of Vaccines

    (2011)
  • B.S. Graham

    Biological challenges and technological opportunities for respiratory syncytial virus vaccine development

    Immunological Reviews

    (2011)
  • E.E. Walsh et al.

    Age related differences in humoral immune response to respiratory syncytial virus infection in adults

    Journal of Medical Virology

    (2004)
  • J.E. McElhaney

    Prevention of infectious diseases in older adults through immunization: the challenge of the senescent immune response

    Expert Review of Vaccines

    (2009)
  • C.L. Lamprecht et al.

    Role of maternal antibody in pneumonia and bronchiolitis due to respiratory syncytial virus

    Journal of Infectious Diseases

    (1981)
  • E.E. Walsh et al.

    Humoral and mucosal immunity in protection from natural respiratory syncytial virus infection in adults

    Journal of Infectious Diseases

    (2004)
  • C.B. Hall et al.

    Immunity to and frequency of reinfection with respiratory syncytial virus

    Journal of Infectious Diseases

    (1991)
  • V. Luchsinger et al.

    Role of neutralizing antibodies in adults with community-acquired pneumonia by respiratory syncytial virus

    Clinical Infectious Diseases

    (2012)
  • B.S. Graham et al.

    Respiratory syncytial virus infection in anti-u-treated mice

    Journal of Virology

    (1991)
  • B.S. Graham et al.

    Role of T lymphocyte subsets in the pathogenesis of primary infection and rechallenge with respiratory syncytial virus in mice

    Journal of Clinical Investigation

    (1991)
  • M.J. Cannon et al.

    Cytotoxic T cells clear virus but augment lung pathology in mice infected with respiratory syncytial virus

    Journal of Experimental Medicine

    (1988)
  • W.H. Alwan et al.

    Distinct types of lung disease caused by functional subsets of antiviral T cells

    Journal of Experimental Medicine

    (1994)
  • L.J. Anderson et al.

    Antigenic characterization of respiratory syncytial virus strains with monoclonal antibodies

    Journal of Infectious Diseases

    (1985)
  • M.A. Mufson et al.

    Subgroup characteristics of respiratory syncytial virus strains recovered from children with two consecutive infections

    Journal of Clinical of Microbiology

    (1987)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text