ReviewRespiratory syncytial virus vaccine development
Introduction
In 1955, Morris et al. isolated a virus from Chimpanzees, chimpanzee coriza agent [1], and shortly thereafter a similar virus was isolated from young children and designated respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) [2], [3]. The importance of this virus as a cause of acute respiratory illness in young children was quickly recognized and efforts to develop an RSV vaccine began. RSV infections are usually symptomatic and in the young child cause the full spectrum of acute respiratory illnesses including a common cold-like illness, croup, bronchitis, bronchiolitis, and pneumonia [4]. Bronchiolitis, i.e. a lower respiratory tract illness with wheezing, is the signature RSV illness in infants and young children. The virus spreads efficiently and is estimated that 50% of children become infected during their first year of life and nearly 100% by 2 years of age [5]. Since infection provides limited protective immunity, repeat infections and disease occur throughout life. Infants <6 months of age, persons of any age with compromised cardiac, pulmonary and immune systems, and the elderly are especially susceptible to more serious complications with infection [6], [7]. RSV is considered the single most important cause of serious acute respiratory illness in infants and young children world-wide causing an estimated 66,000 to over 200,000 deaths and 3.4 million hospitalizations in children <5 years of age each year [8], [9]. In the United States, it is estimated that between 57,000 and 175,000 children <5 years of age are hospitalized each year with RSV [10], [11], [12]. It is also estimated that RSV is associated with over 500,000 emergency room visits [10] but <500 deaths in children <5 years of age each year in the United States. It also causes substantial disease in elderly persons resulting in an estimated 177,000 hospitalizations and between 10,000 and 15,000 deaths each year in the United States [13], [14], [15]. In temperate climates, most illness occurs in yearly outbreaks in the late fall, winter, and early spring months, e.g. October to April in the northern hemisphere and April to September in the southern hemisphere [16], [17], [18]. Outbreaks often last from 4 to 5 months in a community.
Another potential outcome of RSV infection in the infant is later development of reactive airway disease. Multiple studies have shown that children hospitalized with RSV have a substantially increased risk of having reactive airway or asthma through adolescence [19], [20], [21], [22]. What is still unclear, however, if this occurs because children likely to develop reactive airway disease are also more likely to be hospitalized with RSV and the RSV infection is not causally related to the later reactive airway disease or because infection alters the architecture of the airways or patterns for future immune responses associated with reactive airway disease.
The importance of RSV as a respiratory pathogen in young children made it a priority for vaccine development shortly after it was discovered. Unfortunately, after over 50 years of vaccine development no vaccine has yet been licensed and it is not certain which if any vaccines being developed will be successful. The first candidate vaccine, a formalin inactivated RSV vaccine (FI-RSV), was tested in children in the 1960s and predisposed young recipients to more serious disease with later natural infection [23], [24], [25], [26]. Older children who likely had been previously infected with RSV did not suffer this enhanced disease. It appears that prior infection patterned for a safe immune response to the vaccine and prevented development of enhanced disease. A study in mice showed prior live virus infection prevented enhanced disease in mice later vaccinated with FI-RSV vaccine and challenged with RSV [27]. The experience with FI-RSV continues to effect vaccine development. Because of the FI-RSV trial, only attenuated live RSV or RSV proteins expressed in a live virus vector have, so far, been considered safe for testing in RSV naïve children. Unfortunately, no live attenuated RSV or live virus vectored vaccine has yet been licensed. Since older, RSV primed children are not considered at risk for enhanced disease, a variety of other types of vaccines including purified proteins, virus-like particles (VLPs), nanoparticles, and DNA or vectors expressing RSV proteins are being developed for older children and adults. The efficacy of RSV immune prophylaxis first with polyclonal immune globulin [28] and then a neutralizing, anti-F protein monoclonal antibody shows [29] that an effective RSV vaccine should be achievable.
The ongoing challenges in developing RSV vaccines are balanced by advances in our understanding of the virus, the host immune response to vaccines and infection, and pathogenesis of disease. It seems likely that with efficient and appropriately focused effort a safe and effective vaccine is within reach. A number of recent reviews provide excellent discussions of many aspects of RSV and development of RSV vaccines [30], [31], [32]. In this chapter, I will highlight some less frequently considered strategies that, I believe, may facilitate the quest for an RSV vaccine.
Section snippets
Target populations
Our understanding of the epidemiology and burden of RSV disease now suggests that there are at least 4 potential target populations for a vaccine, the young infant, infants >4–6 months of age, pregnant women, and the elderly. Each of these target populations presents different challenges for vaccine development. The young infant is the target population with the greatest potential benefit from an RSV vaccine. However, the young infant has an immature immune system and residual maternal antibody
Strategies for developing RSV vaccines
Developing an RSV vaccine continues to challenge researchers. Some of these challenges are not surprising giving the clinical and epidemiologic features of the disease. As noted above, the need to vaccinate the very young infant to achieve maximal impact of a vaccine presents the challenge of inducing effective responses in infant's who have an immature immune system and residual maternal antibody and safety of a live virus vaccine in children especially vulnerable to RSV disease. The fact that
Pathogenesis of disease
Studies in animals and in humans show that pathology directly associated with virus replication is not sufficient to explain RSV disease and virus induced inflammatory and immune responses are important contributors to the disease process. A better understanding of the interplay between the virus, especially viral proteins and regions in viral proteins, and the host response should identify new approaches to consider in design of vaccines. I will highlight some aspects of RSV disease
Candidate RSV vaccines
The approach to developing live attenuated RSV vaccines has involved a number of RSV proteins, Table 1, and focused on achieving a virus with replication sufficiently attenuated to be safe in the RSV naïve infant and not too attenuated to eliminate an effective immune response. Strategies to improve immunogenicity of the virus without increasing replication are also being explored. In contrast, development of all other types of vaccines, i.e. non-live RSV vaccines, have most often only involved
Comments
Despite over 50 years of research, no RSV vaccine has yet been shown safe and effective. There are, however, as noted above a plethora of promising vaccines and some may provide the answer for one or more target populations. One of the challenges to moving toward licensure is determining which candidate vaccines are likely to succeed. The present approach, evaluating immunogenicity, anti-viral activity, and disease in animals, i.e. mice then cotton rats and possibly non-human primates, has not
References (192)
- et al.
Global burden of acute lower respiratory infections due to respiratory syncytial virus in young children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Lancet
(2010) - et al.
Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010
Lancet
(2013) - et al.
Respiratory syncytial virus neutralizing antibodies in cord blood, respiratory syncytial virus hospitalization, and recurrent wheeze
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
(2009) - et al.
Progress in understanding and controlling respiratory syncytial virus: still crazy after all these years
Virus Research
(2011) - et al.
Immunology of viral respiratory tract infection in infancy
Paediatric Respiratory Reviews
(2003) - et al.
Risk of respiratory syncytial virus infection for infants from low-income families in relationship to age, sex, ethnic group, and maternal antibody level
Journal of Pediatrics
(1981) Antigenic analysis of chimeric and truncated G proteins of respiratory syncytial virus
Virology
(1995)- et al.
Differential immune responses and pulmonary pathophysiology are induced by two different strains of respiratory syncytial virus
American Journal of Pathology
(2006) - et al.
Respiratory syncytial virus limits alpha subunit of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 (eIF2alpha) phosphorylation to maintain translation and viral replication
Journal of Biological Chemistry
(2010) - et al.
Respiratory syncytial virus deficient in soluble G protein induced an increased proinflammatory response in human lung epithelial cells
Virology
(2004)