Inter-individual variation in DNA double-strand break repair in human fibroblasts before and after exposure to low doses of ionizing radiation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2009.10.013Get rights and content

Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) are generally considered the most critical lesion induced by ionizing radiation (IR) and may initiate carcinogenesis and other disease. Using an immunofluorescence assay to simultaneously detect nuclear foci of the phosphorylated forms of histone H2AX and ATM kinase at sites of DSBs, we examined the response of 25 apparently normal and 10 DNA repair-deficient (ATM, ATR, NBN, LIG1, LIG4, and FANCG) primary fibroblast strains irradiated with low doses of 137Cs γ-rays. Quiescent G0/G1-phase cultures were exposed to 5, 10, and 25 cGy and allowed to repair for 24 h. The maximum level of IR-induced foci (0.15 foci per cGy, at 10 or 30 min) in the normal strains showed much less inter-individual variation (CV  0.2) than the level of spontaneous foci, which ranged from 0.2–2.6 foci/cell (CV  0.6; mean ± SD of 1.00 ± 0.57). Significantly slower focus formation post-irradiation was observed in seven normal strains, similar to most mutant strains examined. There was variation in repair efficiency measured by the fraction of IR-induced foci remaining 24 h post-irradiation, curiously with the strains having slower focus formation showing more efficient repair after 25 cGy. Interestingly, the ranges of spontaneous and residual induced foci levels at 24 h in the normal strains were as least as large as those observed for the repair-defective mutant strains. The inter-individual variation in DSB foci parameters observed in cells exposed to low doses of ionizing radiation in this small survey of apparently normal people suggests that hypomorphic genetic variants in genomic maintenance and/or DNA damage signaling and repair genes may contribute to differential susceptibility to cancer induced by environmental mutagens.

Introduction

Ionizing radiation (IR) is a ubiquitous environmental mutagen and a prototypical DNA-damaging agent. Health effects of low doses of IR continue to be a matter of debate for concerns of radiological protection. Human population heterogeneity in radiosensitivity is dramatically illustrated by rare genetic disorders such as ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T), Nijmegen breakage syndrome (NBS), and ligase IV deficiency (LIG4 syndrome). Cells derived from these patients are hypersensitive to IR due to mutations impacting DNA double-strand break (DSB) recognition, signaling, and repair capacity [1], [2], [3]. Many studies employing cell survival and chromosome aberration assays have shown significant variation among primary fibroblast strains derived from apparently normal individuals in the general population [4], [5], [6], [7]. Interestingly, while strains derived from patients with A-T and other syndromes were more sensitive on average than normal strains, in each case the overall response of the mutant strains overlapped the distribution of the normal strains [5]. The majority of these in vitro studies employed relatively high doses of IR (≥50 cGy) because of limited experimental sensitivity at low doses. However, there is accumulating evidence of inter-individual variation for induced chromosomal aberrations after low IR doses [8], [9], [10] and for cell survival and γ-H2AX foci induction during continuous low dose-rate exposure [7], [11], [12].

Epidemiological studies indicate that cancer risk increases with IR exposure even at low doses [13], [14], [15], [16]. Reviews of individual and pooled studies of populations that received accidental, medical, or occupational IR exposures support a linear increase in cancer risk with increasing dose, with large uncertainties of risk at low dose. A study examining 55 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 17 DNA repair genes in a large cohort of U.S. radiologic technologists revealed a significant correlation between breast cancer risk, low dose occupational IR exposure, and four SNPs in BRCA1 and PRKDC [16]. Much work remains to determine how genetic variation in DNA repair and related genes [17], [18], [19], [20] impacts individual response and relative health risk after low-dose exposure.

Directly induced DSBs, as well as bi-stranded, clustered DNA damage that may be processed into DSBs [21], are considered the critical IR-induced lesions associated with cancer risk [22], [23], [24]. Studies of the activation of ATM and Tp53-dependent signaling pathways [25], [26] suggest that normal cells may exhibit a threshold for the recognition of DSBs induced by low doses. It is likely that incorrectly repaired DSBs underlie the chromosomal instability associated with neoplastic transformation as evidence of activated DNA damage response pathways and increased DSB levels have been observed in precancerous tissues [27], [28], [29].

Immunochemical detection of histone H2AX phosphorylated at Ser139 (γ-H2AX) provides a sensitive measure of DSB induction and repair in various cell types, including quiescent G0/G1-phase human fibroblasts after low dose IR [11], [12], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37]. Activation of the protein kinase ATM by DSBs is accompanied by its intermolecular auto-phosphorylation at Ser1981 [38]. In irradiated fibroblasts ATMS1981-P (pATM) foci form as early as 5 min after irradiation with 20 cGy [38], co-localize with γ-H2AX foci, and display similar kinetics of formation and disappearance [39]. We have used an assay for enumerating DSBs based on this co-localization [38], [39], [40], [41] to assess the degree of variation among quiescent G0/G1-phase primary fibroblasts derived from a small group of 25 apparently normal individuals for: (1) the level of spontaneous DSBs, (2) the yield and kinetics of recognition of IR-induced DSBs, and (3) the efficiency and dose dependence of DSB repair by NHEJ following doses of 5, 10, and 25 cGy of 137Cs γ-rays. To gain a sense of the biological significance of the variation observed in the normal strains, we also assayed mutant fibroblast strains defective in DSB recognition, signaling, and repair: ATM [1], ATR [3], [42], NBN (NBS1) [2], [43], LIG1 [44], LIG4 [3], [45], [46], and FANCG [47].

Section snippets

Cell culture and irradiations

Primary fibroblast strains identified in Supporting Information (SI) Table 1 were obtained from the Coriell Cell Repositories (Camden, NJ, USA). Cells were cultured in αMEM medium supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone), 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, vitamins, amino acids, and GlutaMAX™-I (GIBCO/Invitrogen) in a 37 °C incubator supplied with 95% air/5% CO2. Cells were passaged regularly prior to reaching confluency, and seeded at ∼30% density into two-well microscope

Scoring DSBs using co-localization of γ-H2AX and pATM nuclear foci

We adopted pATM foci [39] as a confirmatory marker for γ-H2AX-associated DSBs based on the criteria that both large γ-H2AX foci and smaller γ-H2AX foci with co-localizing pATM foci are scored, as shown in Fig. 1A–C. Since pATM foci were not detected in the three ATM strains, we scored γ-H2AX foci only, which arise from DNA-PK phosphorylation [41]. Maximal induction of γ-H2AX foci in normal quiescent G0/G1-phase human fibroblasts occurs within 10–30 min after IR exposure, with many strains

Discussion

For irradiated mammalian cells, a close relationship exists between the induction of DSBs and γ-H2AX foci [34], [35], [36] although not all foci necessarily reflect DSBs in cells undergoing DNA replication [37]. As the size distribution of DSB foci is likely influenced by cell type and genetic background, as well as the laboratory methodology used to detect them, we devised an assay for scoring γ-H2AX foci based on their co-localization with pATM foci. An illustration of how methodological

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Cynthia Thomas for her assistance in the initial stages of this project and Dan Moore for statistical consultation. This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contracts W-7405-Eng-48 and DE-AC52-07NA27344 and was funded by the U.S. DOE Low Dose Radiation Research Program (FWP SCW-0543).

References (53)

  • T.T. Paull et al.

    A critical role for histone H2AX in recruitment of repair factors to nuclear foci after DNA damage

    Curr. Biol.

    (2000)
  • S. Burma et al.

    ATM phosphorylates histone H2AX in response to DNA double-strand breaks

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2001)
  • M.E. Conley et al.

    A chromosomal breakage syndrome with profound immunodeficiency

    Blood

    (1986)
  • D.E. Barnes et al.

    Mutations in the DNA ligase I gene of an individual with immunodeficiencies and cellular hypersensitivity to DNA-damaging agents

    Cell

    (1992)
  • M. O’Driscoll et al.

    DNA ligase IV mutations identified in patients exhibiting developmental delay and immunodeficiency

    Mol. Cell

    (2001)
  • L.H. Thompson et al.

    Cellular and molecular consequences of defective Fanconi anemia proteins: mechanistic insights

    Mutat. Res.

    (2009)
  • E. Riballo et al.

    A pathway of double-strand break rejoining dependent upon ATM, Artemis, and proteins locating to gamma-H2AX foci, Mol

    Cell

    (2004)
  • P. Kegel et al.

    X-irradiation of cells on glass slides has a dose doubling impact

    DNA Repair

    (2007)
  • M.F. Lavin

    Ataxia-telangiectasia: from a rare disorder to a paradigm for cell signalling and cancer

    Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.

    (2008)
  • I. Demuth et al.

    The clinical manifestation of a defective response to DNA double-strand breaks as exemplified by Nijmegen breakage syndrome

    Oncogene

    (2007)
  • H. Nagasawa et al.

    Radiosensitivities of ten apparently normal human diploid fibroblast strains to cell killing, G2-phase chromosomal aberrations, and cell cycle delay

    Cancer Res.

    (1988)
  • P.F. Wilson et al.

    Radiation sensitivity of primary fibroblasts from hereditary retinoblastoma family members and some apparently normal controls: colony formation ability during continuous low-dose-rate gamma irradiation

    Radiat. Res.

    (2008)
  • I. Hayata et al.

    Effect of high-level natural radiation on chromosomes of residents in southern China

    Cytogenet. Genome Res.

    (2004)
  • A.J. Sigurdson et al.

    Routine diagnostic X-ray examinations and increased frequency of chromosome translocations among U.S. radiologic technologists

    Cancer Res.

    (2008)
  • T.A. Kato et al.

    Levels of gamma-H2AX Foci after low-dose-rate irradiation reveal a DNA DSB rejoining defect in cells from human ATM heterozygotes in two at families and in another apparently normal individual

    Radiat. Res.

    (2006)
  • A.M. Kellerer

    Risk estimates for radiation-induced cancer–the epidemiological evidence

    Radiat. Environ. Biophys.

    (2000)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Present address: School of Molecular Biosciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164-4660 USA.

    View full text