Selected topic: Emergency radiology
Chest Radiograph vs. Computed Tomography Scan in the Evaluation for Pneumonia

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.11.042Get rights and content

Abstract

To determine, in an Emergency Department (ED) population, the incidence of pneumonia diagnosed on thoracic computed tomography (CT) in the setting of negative or non-diagnostic chest radiographs (CXR). This is a retrospective chart review of all ED visits of adult patients ultimately diagnosed with “pneumonia” in whom both CXR and CT were obtained. We note cases in which the CXR was either negative or non-diagnostic for pneumonia and the CT noted a definitive infiltrate consistent with pneumonia. Of the 1,057 patients diagnosed with pneumonia, both CXR and CT were performed in 97 cases. Of this group, there were 26 patients (27%), in whom the CXR was either negative or non-diagnostic, but the CT noted an infiltrate/consolidation consistent with pneumonia. In our retrospective review of ED patients, we find that in 27% of cases in which both a CXR and a CT scan were performed in the work-up of varied chief complaints, pneumonia was demonstrated on CT in the face of a negative or non-diagnostic CXR. This analysis demonstrates the need for further studies regarding the appropriate radiographic evaluation of pneumonia, particularly in high-risk patients.

Introduction

In the United States, there are over 5 million cases of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) each year, with approximately 2 million requiring hospitalization; almost 50,000 deaths are attributed to CAP (sixth leading cause of death from infectious diseases). The estimated annual cost of treatment is over $20 billion (1).

Chest radiography is the usual standard for diagnosing pneumonia in the Emergency Department (ED), and virtually all studies looking at the diagnosis and disposition of patients have used plain chest X-ray study interpretation (by a Radiology attending) as the reference standard (2, 3). Further, the standard of care in the ED is to treat adult patients with radiographic evidence of an infiltrate with antibiotics, because this illness continues to have an overall high mortality (4). When patients with cough or fever have a normal lung examination and a negative chest X-ray study, “pneumonia” is ruled out and oftentimes “bronchitis” is diagnosed. The use of antibiotics to treat “bronchitis” in adults is discouraged (5). Our study was performed to assess the incidence of pneumonia diagnosed on thoracic computed tomography (CT) scan in the setting of negative or non-diagnostic chest radiographs (CXR).

Unfortunately, chest radiography, the most common imaging modality in the diagnosis of pneumonia, has been shown to be somewhat unreliable in the definitive diagnosis of pneumonia. Although the significance of this is unknown, there is a demonstrable superiority of thoracic CT scan over CXR in the diagnosis of pneumonia in particular patient populations. Studies have favorably compared CT scan vs. CXR in populations of immunocompetent children, neutropenic patients, and patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (6, 7, 8). At present, there have been no studies that specifically look at an ED population with regard to pneumonia evident on thoracic CT scan in the setting of a negative or non-diagnostic chest X-ray study.

Section snippets

Study Design

This was a hypothesis-forming, retrospective chart review conducted to study an ED patient population with apparent pneumonia; the goal was to assess how often CT scan detects infiltrate or consolidation when chest X-ray studies are either negative or non-diagnostic. Our hospital's institutional review board approved the study protocol on an “exemption” status, based on the collection of existing data, with removal of any protected health information.

Study Setting and Participants

This study was based in the ED of the

Results

During the study period, a total of 1057 records contained the diagnosis code for pneumonia; both CXR studies and CT scans were performed in 97 cases. In 26 of these cases, the final radiologic interpretation included a negative or non-diagnostic CXR study and a definitive infiltrate/consolidation was seen on CT scan (Table 1). All of these patients were subsequently treated for pneumonia.

The age range of the patient population in these 26 cases was 18–79 years. There was a great range of

Discussion

With the growing recognition of the value of a CT scan, consideration of its use in common medical conditions is warranted. Pneumonia has historically been evaluated by chest radiography as the primary imaging modality. However, there have been several articles that have addressed the superiority of a CT scan over a CXR study in particular patient populations. Kendrick et al., in their study of 42 immunocompetent children admitted with community-acquired pneumonia, found that a CT scan is

Limitations

The study is limited both in the small sample size and its retrospective nature. There may be some degree of selection bias as those patients with a normal or non-diagnostic CXR study still underwent further study. The physician may have felt that the clinical status of the patient demanded more extensive imaging; many of these CXR/CT scan work-ups aimed to rule out pulmonary embolism as an explanation for the symptoms. Further, the methodology of the study allows us to determine the prevalence

Conclusions

This brief retrospective analysis demonstrates the common finding of a pneumonia diagnosed on a CT scan in the face of a negative or non-diagnostic chest X-ray study. Due to the limitations of our study, it would not be appropriate to blindly generalize our results to a population in whom there is a concern for pneumonia. Certainly, in the setting of a high clinical probability of pneumonia, empiric treatment is a reasonable course even with a negative chest X-ray study. However, it would

References (8)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (92)

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text