Clinical research study
Marked Reduction in 30-Day Mortality Among Elderly Patients with Community-acquired Pneumonia

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.08.019Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Community-acquired pneumonia is the most common infectious cause of death in the US. Over the last 2 decades, patient characteristics and clinical care have changed. To understand the impact of these changes, we quantified incidence and mortality trends among elderly adults.

Methods

We used Medicare claims to identify episodes of pneumonia, based on a validated combination of diagnosis codes. Comorbidities were ascertained using the diagnosis codes located on a 1-year look back. Trends in patient characteristics and site of care were compared. The association between year of pneumonia episode and 30-day mortality was then evaluated by logistic regression, with adjustment for age, sex, and comorbidities.

Results

We identified 2,654,955 cases of pneumonia from 1987-2005. During this period, the proportion treated as inpatients decreased, the proportion aged ≥80 years increased, and the frequency of many comorbidities rose. Adjusted incidence increased to 3096 episodes per 100,000 population in 1999, with some decrease thereafter. Age/sex-adjusted mortality decreased from 13.5% to 9.7%, a relative reduction of 28.1%. Compared with 1987, the risk of mortality decreased through 2005 (adjusted odds ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.47). This result was robust to a restriction on comorbid diagnoses assessing for the results' sensitivity to increased coding.

Conclusions

These findings show a marked mortality reduction over time in community-acquired pneumonia patients. We hypothesize that increased pneumococcal and influenza vaccination rates as well as wider use of guideline-concordant antibiotics explain a large portion of this trend. © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Section snippets

Data Source and Study Subjects

Our analyses used all claims (1987-2005) for a random 20% sample of Medicare patients aged ≥65 years from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Research Identifiable Files. Cases of community-acquired pneumonia were identified by the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9 CM)14 code combinations as either: a principal diagnosis of pneumonia (codes 481-487) or a principal diagnosis of respiratory distress (code 786) or respiratory failure

Characteristics of the Study Subjects and Incidence Trends

The total sample of 2,654,955 community-acquired pneumonia subjects included 1,130,919 outpatients and 1,524,036 inpatients. The Table shows the characteristics of the study subjects for the periods 1987-1989 and 2003-2005. From the early period to the recent period, the proportion of patients aged ≥80 years increased from 42.5% to 47.5% (P <.001), while the proportion of subjects treated as inpatients decreased from 62.6% to 55.7% (P <.001). Most of this shift in site of care had occurred by

Discussion

Our findings reveal a substantial mortality reduction in elderly pneumonia patients from 1987 to 2005, over which time the relative risk of mortality fell by 28%, and, after comorbidity adjustment, 54%. Our data demonstrate a 13.5% mortality rate in 1987 that decreased markedly over the period studied. However, even this initial mortality rate reflects a decrease during the 1980s. A Lancet report studying community-acquired pneumonia patients with a mean age of 51 years in 1980 and 1981 showed

Acknowledgment

We thank Daniel E. Singer, David Blumenthal, and Lisa I. Iezzoni for their mentorship, advice, and critical review of the manuscript. We thank Douglas M. Norton for his programming assistance.

References (42)

  • J.B. Kornum et al.

    Type 2 diabetes and pneumonia outcomes: a population-based cohort study

    Diabetes Care

    (2007)
  • G.B. Seymann

    Community-acquired pneumonia: defining quality care

    J Hosp Med

    (2006)
  • L.M. Baddour et al.

    Combination antibiotic therapy lowers mortality among severely ill patients with pneumococcal bacteremia

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med

    (2004)
  • G.W. Waterer et al.

    Monotherapy may be suboptimal for severe bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia

    Arch Intern Med

    (2001)
  • T.P. Meehan et al.

    Quality of care, process, and outcomes in elderly patients with pneumonia

    JAMA

    (1997)
  • M.J. Fine et al.

    Processes and outcomes of care for patients with community-acquired pneumonia: results from the Pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) cohort study

    Arch Intern Med

    (1999)
  • J.M. Fine et al.

    Patient and hospital characteristics associated with recommended processes of care for elderly patients hospitalized with pneumonia: results from the medicare quality indicator system pneumonia module

    Arch Intern Med

    (2002)
  • International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification

    (2009)
  • J. Whittle et al.

    Community-acquired pneumonia: can it be defined with claims data?

    Am J Med Qual

    (1997)
  • D.M. Yealy et al.

    Effect of increasing the intensity of implementing pneumonia guidelines: a randomized, controlled trial

    Ann Intern Med

    (2005)
  • A. Elixhauser et al.

    Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data

    Med Care

    (1998)
  • Cited by (72)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Funding: This work was supported by unrestricted grants P01 AG31098, P30 AG12810, and P01AG005842 from the National Institute on Aging. It also was supported by an institutional Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award (T32 HP11001) from the Health Resources and Services Administration of the Department of Health and Human Services, the Division of General Internal Medicine at the Massachusetts General Hospital, and grant F32 HS016948-01 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The supporters had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.

    Conflict of Interest: The authors confirm the absence of potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.

    Authorship: All authors had access to the data and a role in writing the manuscript. Dr. Ruhnke had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

    View full text