Elsevier

The Lancet Oncology

Volume 15, Issue 6, May 2014, Pages e234-e242
The Lancet Oncology

Personal View
Addressing overdiagnosis and overtreatment in cancer: a prescription for change

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70598-9Get rights and content

Summary

A vast range of disorders—from indolent to fast-growing lesions—are labelled as cancer. Therefore, we believe that several changes should be made to the approach to cancer screening and care, such as use of new terminology for indolent and precancerous disorders. We propose the term indolent lesion of epithelial origin, or IDLE, for those lesions (currently labelled as cancers) and their precursors that are unlikely to cause harm if they are left untreated. Furthermore, precursors of cancer or high-risk disorders should not have the term cancer in them. The rationale for this change in approach is that indolent lesions with low malignant potential are common, and screening brings indolent lesions and their precursors to clinical attention, which leads to overdiagnosis and, if unrecognised, possible overtreatment. To minimise that potential, new strategies should be adopted to better define and manage IDLEs. Screening guidelines should be revised to lower the chance of detection of minimal-risk IDLEs and inconsequential cancers with the same energy traditionally used to increase the sensitivity of screening tests. Changing the terminology for some of the lesions currently referred to as cancer will allow physicians to shift medicolegal notions and perceived risk to reflect the evolving understanding of biology, be more judicious about when a biopsy should be done, and organise studies and registries that offer observation or less invasive approaches for indolent disease. Emphasis on avoidance of harm while assuring benefit will improve screening and treatment of patients and will be equally effective in the prevention of death from cancer.

Introduction

On March 8–9, 2012, the National Cancer Institute convened a meeting to assess the problem of cancer overdiagnosis, which occurs when tumours that would otherwise not become symptomatic are identified and treated. When this overdiagnosis is not recognised, it can lead to overtreatment. Participants of the meeting agreed that with the deployment of increasingly sensitive imaging tests, more lesions are being identified and labelled as cancer. This Personal View describes the initial steps to address the increasing problem of overdiagnosis and overtreatment.

The word cancer encompasses a range of disorders, from those that are always lethal if left untreated (or even if treated) to indolent lesions with extremely low potential for metastatic progression and death.1 Several other diseases show a similar range of severity—eg, diabetes can progress slowly or rapidly, as can rheumatoid arthritis, hepatitis, coronary artery disease, and inflammatory bowel disease. Unfortunately, when patients hear the word cancer, most assume they have a disease that will progress, metastasise, and cause death. Many physicians think so as well, and act or advise their patients accordingly. However, since many tumours do not have the unrelenting capacity for progression and death, new guidance is needed to describe and label the heterogeneous diseases currently referred to as cancer.

Section snippets

Benefits of screening, according to cancer type

Screening is based on the assumption that cancer has an orderly and gradual progression (figure 1A). Good survival outcomes for patients with the earliest stages of disease led to the conclusion that detection of cancer at an early stage would dramatically reduce cancer mortality. For some cancers, incidence of disease dropped after screening was initiated (eg, cervical and colon cancer), but it increased for others (eg, breast and prostate cancer).1 In breast and prostate cancer, for example,

The concept of the IDLE lesion

Screening undoubtedly detects indolent disease, best exemplified in prostate cancer,16, 17 breast cancer,1 and even lung cancer.18, 19, 20 This detection of indolent disease is mainly due to the inherent tendency of all screening tests to preferentially detect slower growing cancers because more rapidly growing cancers are more likely to present between screens. Indolent disease might account for 15–75% of all cancers, depending on organ type.8 Disease-based screening and diagnostic scans for

A call for change

We attended the March 8–9, 2012, US National Cancer Institute multidisciplinary brainstorming meeting and agreed that it was important for the medical community to recognise that cancer overdiagnosis is an increasingly common problem. We, along with the other participants, made the following recommendations for consideration and dissemination (summarised in panel).

Conclusion

In conclusion, we have discussed the harms that are accruing from a one-size-fits-all approach to cancer screening and overuse of the term cancer. To reduce the substantial harm from this approach and to reduce the overall burden of cancer, the wide range of behaviours and outcomes associated with what is currently called cancer should be recognised. As a collective community of clinicians, researchers, patients, and stakeholders, the challenge is to redefine cancer based on its behaviour, use

Search strategy and selection criteria

We identified references for this Personal View by searching PubMed with the search terms “over diagnosis”, “over treatment”, and “cancer”. We looked at articles published in English between Jan 1, 1985, and the date of our last search (Nov 25, 2013). We also used and shared our extensive databases, and individual authors were assigned to review each organ subtype discussed in this Personal View. There were more references than could be accommodated by the manuscript reference limit, so the

References (81)

  • D Shibata

    Cancer. Heterogeneity and tumor history

    Science

    (2012)
  • LJ Esserman et al.

    Chemotherapy response and recurrence-free survival in neoadjuvant breast cancer depends on biomarker profiles: results from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL (CALGB 150007/150012; ACRIN 6657)

    Breast Cancer Res Treat

    (2012)
  • LS Lindstrom et al.

    Clinically used breast cancer markers such as estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 are unstable throughout tumor progression

    J Clin Oncol

    (2012)
  • Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours

    Nature

    (2012)
  • P Autier et al.

    Breast cancer screening: the questions answered

    Nat Rev Clin Oncol

    (2012)
  • HG Welch et al.

    Overdiagnosis in cancer

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (2010)
  • LJ Esserman et al.

    Overdiagnosis and overtreatment in cancer: an opportunity for improvement

    JAMA

    (2013)
  • SMFT Domchek et al.

    Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality

    JAMA

    (2010)
  • L Klotz et al.

    Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer

    J Clin Oncol

    (2010)
  • IJ Powell et al.

    Evidence supports a faster growth rate and/or earlier transformation to clinically significant prostate cancer in black than in white American men, and influences racial progression and mortality disparity

    J Urol

    (2010)
  • WG Woods et al.

    Screening of infants and mortality due to neuroblastoma

    N Engl J Med

    (2002)
  • MJ Bissell et al.

    Why don't we get more cancer? A proposed role of the microenvironment in restraining cancer progression

    Nat Med

    (2011)
  • LJ Esserman et al.

    Pathologic complete response predicts recurrence-free survival more effectively by cancer subset: results from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL—CALGB 150007/150012, ACRIN 6657

    J Clin Oncol

    (2012)
  • TJ Wilt et al.

    Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (2012)
  • IM Thompson et al.

    Prostate cancer—uncertainty and a way forward

    N Engl J Med

    (2012)
  • PB Bach et al.

    Computed tomography screening and lung cancer outcomes

    JAMA

    (2007)
  • LL Humphrey et al.

    Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: a systematic review to update the US Preventive services task force recommendation

    Ann Intern Med

    (2013)
  • SEER Cancer Statistics Review (CSR) 1975–2009

  • L Davies et al.

    Increasing incidence of thyroid cancer in the United States, 1973–2002

    JAMA

    (2006)
  • HR Harach et al.

    Occult papillary carcinoma of the thyroid. A “normal” finding in Finland. A systematic autopsy study

    Cancer

    (1985)
  • EL Mazzaferri

    Managing small thyroid cancers

    JAMA

    (2006)
  • JJ Cronan

    Thyroid nodules: is it time to turn off the US machines?

    Radiology

    (2008)
  • NB Delongchamps et al.

    The role of prevalence in the diagnosis of prostate cancer

    Cancer Control

    (2006)
  • MR Cooperberg et al.

    Time trends and local variation in primary treatment of localized prostate cancer

    J Clin Oncol

    (2010)
  • MG Sanda et al.

    Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors

    N Engl J Med

    (2008)
  • IM Thompson et al.

    Long-term survival of participants in the prostate cancer prevention trial

    N Engl J Med

    (2013)
  • MJ McFarlane et al.

    The ‘epidemiologic necropsy’. Unexpected detections, demographic selections, and changing rates of lung cancer

    JAMA

    (1987)
  • PM Marcus et al.

    Extended lung cancer incidence follow-up in the Mayo Lung Project and overdiagnosis

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (2006)
  • DR Aberle et al.

    Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening

    N Engl J Med

    (2011)
  • EF Patz et al.

    Overdiagnosis in low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer

    JAMA Intern Med

    (2014)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text