Therapeutic
Pigtail tube drainage in the treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-6757(02)42247-4Get rights and content

Abstract

We report our experience in using pigtail tube drainage in the treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax compared with traditional chest tube thoracotomy. One hundred two patients were included and analyzed. Fifty patients were treated with the pigtail tube and 52 patients were treated with the traditional chest tube. The extubation time, mean hospital stay, evacuation rate, and total cost were similar without a significant statistical difference. Among the chest tube group, 15 underwent surgical intervention as a result of delayed resolution and hemopneumothorax; and among the pigtail group, 15 had other procedures for pneumothorax, including chest tube insertion and surgical intervention. This verifies our initial suspicion that the effectiveness of the pigtail drainage system is no less than that of the chest tube. Therefore, when considering ambulatory ability and good patient compliance, the pigtail tube drainage system can be considered as the treatment of choice for spontaneous pneumothorax.

Section snippets

Patients

We retrospectively collected and reviewed the data of patients with spontaneous pneumothorax treated at China Medical College Hospital from January 1997 to September 2001. The study population was determined by reviewing the charts of patients who were discharged with the diagnosis of spontaneous pneumothorax, excluding congenital, traumatic, tuberculosis, and current lung disease. The individual patient’s chart and chest x-ray (CXR) were carefully reviewed. Only symptomatic patients with a

Tube intubation

The choice of treating spontaneous pneumothorax patients with observation, tube insertion, or surgery was assessed and determined by clinical physicians. In patients undergoing pigtail drainage, a chest echo was performed first for guidance, then the pigtail (8,10 Fr) with a trocar system was inserted into the superior part of the fourth rib at the middle axillary line, after a local anesthesia was injected, and dilated by surgical blade, with the patient in a sitting position.10 The catheter

Results

Among the 102 enrolled patients, the clinical symptoms included chest pain (N = 85, 83.3%), dyspnea (N = 12, 11.7%), and tachypnea (N = 14, 13.7%). Forty-four patients (43.1%) had a right-sided pneumothorax and 58 patients (56.9%) had a left-sided pneumothorax. No significant differences were found between the two groups with respect to the demographic characteristics shown in Table 1.

We examined various data associated with the two procedures. The results (summarized in Table 2) were as

Discussion

The goals of treatment in patients with pneumothorax are relief of pain and respiratory distress in the acute phase, and air evacuation and reexpansion of the lung accomplish this. In asymptomatic patients and those with a small amount of pneumothorax (often less than 20%),2 observation and a close follow-up is often sufficient. However, in patients with a large amount of pneumothorax (over 25%), evacuation of the pleural air is needed. Treatments include simple needle aspiration, chest tube

References (15)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (49)

  • A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Pigtail Catheter and Chest Tube as the Initial Treatment for Pneumothorax

    2018, Chest
    Citation Excerpt :

    The 11 studies involved a total of 875 patients from four continents: one from Africa (Egypt), four from Asia (Taiwan and Hong Kong), one from Europe (Denmark), and five from North America (United States). Of the 11 included studies, two were RCTs9,10 involving 62 patients, and nine were retrospective cohort studies3,5,11-17 involving 813 patients. These patients were enrolled from 1973 to 2014.

  • Surgical management of complications of burn injury

    2018, Total Burn Care: Fifth Edition
  • Surgical Management of Complications of Burn Injury

    2017, Total Burn Care, Fifth Edition
  • Critical Procedures in Pediatric Emergency Medicine

    2013, Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America
    Citation Excerpt :

    These techniques and equipment have different success rates depending on the fluid to be removed and few have studies performed in the ED. There is a lack of evidence for treatment in traumatic pneumothoraces, especially in pediatric patients; however, there is a growing body of evidence about the expected treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax.44–49 Chest radiography has been established as the standard for the initial approach to diagnosing and assessing pneumothorax size50; however, ultrasound is emerging as a useful tool in the treatment of pleural fluid collections.51,52

  • Small-bore catheter versus chest tube drainage for pneumothorax

    2012, American Journal of Emergency Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    Theses results were supported by 4 retrospective comparative studies that found that small-bore catheters (8-14F catheter) were as effective as large CTs in treating spontaneous pneumothorax [23-26], whether primary [23-25] or secondary [24-26]. In these previous studies, small-bore catheters were used in 50 PSPs [23], 69 SSPs [26], and 24 and 36 spontaneous pneumothoraces, respectively [24,25]. However, these studies used catheters no smaller than 8F catheter and only focused on spontaneous pneumothoraces, excluding patients with traumatic or iatrogenic pneumothorax.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text