Original article
Effect of environmental factors on the development of allergic disorders in infancy

https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-6749(92)90077-FGet rights and content

Abstract

A total of 1167 infants were followed for 1 year in a population-based prospective study to assess the effect of environmental factors on the development of allergic disorders. Some of these environmental factors are interdependent. Mothers who formula fed their infants smoked more often (p < 0.001) and tended to belong to lower social classes (p < 0.01). Logistic regression analysis was performed to adjust for these confounding variables. Maternal smoking adversely affected the prevalence of asthma (p = 0.003) defined as three or more separate episodes of wheezing and total allergy (p = 0.02). Infants in lower socioeconomic groups developed asthma significantly more often (p = 0.03) than infants born in higher socioeconomic groups. There was a nonsignificant trend for infants born in summer to develop asthma more than infants born in winter (p = 0.08). No effect of these factors was observed on eczema, food intolerance, or on the subgroup of infants with definite allergy (clinical disorder with positive skin prick test [SPT]). Exposure to animal dander did not influence the prevalence of clinical disorder, but positive SPT reaction to cat dander was more prevalent in infants who were exposed to cats and/or dogs (p = 0.04). Positive SPT to house dust mite occurred significantly more often in infants who were formula fed (p = 0.05). The environmental factors had a profound effect on the prevalence of asthma but not on other allergic disorders.

References (24)

  • J Morrison Smith et al.

    Atopic disease and month of birth

    Clin Allergy

    (1979)
  • DW Hide et al.

    Cord serum IgE: an insensitive method for the detection of atopy

    Clin Exp Allergy

    (1991)
  • Cited by (191)

    • Effect of socioeconomic status on leg muscle power in Tunisian adolescent athletes

      2017, Science and Sports
      Citation Excerpt :

      class 5 (b), unemployed. For analysis, we considered class 1, 2 and 3 as high socioeconomic status (HSES) and class 4 and 5 as low socioeconomic status (LSES) as proposed by Arshad and Hide [19]. The anthropometrics parameters were assessed by the same person, using the same material.

    • Adjusting background noise in cluster analyses of longitudinal data

      2017, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis
      Citation Excerpt :

      The information was collected in a birth cohort on the Isle of Wight in the United Kingdom. Details of the cohort and related information on data collection can be found elsewhere (Arshad and Hide, 1992). In this analysis, wheal sizes of 624 subjects in reaction to grass allergens at three time points (ages 4, 10, and 18) are included in the analyses.

    • Defining phenotypes in rhinitis: A step toward personalized medicine

      2015, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text