Skip to main content
Log in

Significance of noncalcified coronary plaque in asymptomatic subjects with low coronary artery calcium score: assessment with coronary computed tomography angiography

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We aimed to investigate the prevalence and severity of noncalcified coronary plaques (NCP) using coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and analyze predictors of significant coronary stenosis by NCP in asymptomatic subjects with low coronary artery calcium score (CACS). The institutional review board approved this retrospective study and all patients gave written, informed consent. The presence of plaque, severity of stenosis, plaque characteristics, and CACS were assessed in 7,515 asymptomatic subjects. We evaluated the prevalence and severity of NCP in subjects having low CACS (707 subjects; men with CACS from 1 to 50 and women from 1 to 10) in comparison to those having 0 CACS (6,040 subjects) as the reference standard. Conventional risk factors were assessed for predictors of NCP and significant stenosis by NCP. We also investigated the cardiac events of the patients through medical records. Compared to subjects with 0 CACS, those with low CACS showed higher prevalence of NCP (6.9% vs. 31.5%, P < 0.001) and significant stenosis caused by NCP (0.8% vs. 7.5%, P < 0.001). In the low CACS group, independent predictors for significant NCP included diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, and elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (all P < 0.05). However, 47.2% of subjects with significant NCP were classified into the low to intermediate risk according to Framingham Risk Score. At the median follow up of 42 months (range: 3–60 months), cardiac events were significantly higher in the low CACS group compared to the 0 CACS group (2.6% vs. 0.27%, P < 0.001). In asymptomatic subjects having low CACS, the prevalence and severity of NCP were higher as compared to subjects having zero CACS and predictors of significant stenosis by NCP were DM, hypertension and LDL-Cholesterol. Therefore, CCTA may be useful for risk stratification of coronary artery disease as added value over CACS in selected populations with low CACS who have predictors of significant NCP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Myerburg RJ, Interian A Jr, Mitrani RM et al (1997) Frequency of sudden cardiac death and profiles of risk. Am J Cardiol 80B(5):10F–19F

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kondos GT, Hoff JA, Sevrukov A et al (2003) Electron-beam tomography coronary artery calcium and cardiac events: a 37-month follow-up of 5635 initially asymptomatic low- to intermediate-risk adults. Circulation 107(20):2571–2576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Greenland P, LaBree L, Azen SP et al (2004) Coronary artery calcium score combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals. JAMA 291(2):210–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Greenland P, Bonow RO, Brundage BH et al (2007) ACCF/AHA 2007 clinical expert consensus document on coronary artery calcium scoring by computed tomography in global cardiovascular risk assessment and in evaluation of patients with chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Expert Consensus Task Force (ACCF/AHA Writing Committee to Update the 2000 Expert Consensus Document on Electron Beam Computed Tomography) developed in collaboration with the Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 49(3):378–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. van Werkhoven JM, Schuijf JD, Gaemperli O et al (2009) Incremental prognostic value of multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography over coronary artery calcium scoring in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 30(21):2622–2629

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hoffmann U, Moselewski F, Nieman K et al (2006) Noninvasive assessment of plaque morphology and composition in culprit and stable lesions in acute coronary syndrome and stable lesions in stable angina by multidetector computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 47(8):1655–1662

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schuijf JD, Beck T, Burgstahler C et al (2007) Differences in plaque composition and distribution in stable coronary artery disease versus acute coronary syndromes; non-invasive evaluation with multi-slice computed tomography. Acute Card Care 9(1):48–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheng VY, Lepor NE, Madyoon H et al (2007) Presence and severity of noncalcified coronary plaque on 64-slice computed tomographic coronary angiography in patients with zero and low coronary artery calcium. Am J Cardiol 99(9):1183–1186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rubinshtein R, Gaspar T, Halon DA et al (2007) Prevalence and extent of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with zero or low calcium score undergoing 64-slice cardiac multidetector computed tomography for evaluation of a chest pain syndrome. Am J Cardiol 99(4):472–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Venkatesh V, Ellins ML, Yang S et al (2009) Incremental detection of coronary artery disease by assessment of non-calcified plaque on coronary CT angiography. Clin Radiol 64(3):250–255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sarwar A, Shaw LJ, Shapiro MD et al (2009) Diagnostic and prognostic value of absence of coronary artery calcification. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2(6):675–688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoff JA, Chomka EV, Krainik AJ et al (2001) Age and gender distributions of coronary artery calcium detected by electron beam tomography in 35, 246 adults. Am J Cardiol 87(12):1335–1339

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lawlor DA, Adamson J, Ebrahim S (2003) Performance of the WHO Rose angina questionnaire in post-menopausal women: are all of the questions necessary? J Epidemiol Community Health 57(7):538–541

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) (2002) Expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation 106(25):3143–3421

    Google Scholar 

  15. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ et al (1990) Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 15(4):827–832

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chun EJ, Lee W, Choi YH et al (2008) Effects of nitroglycerin on the diagnostic accuracy of electrocardiogram-gated coronary computed tomography angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32(1):86–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Leber AW, Becker A, Knez A et al (2006) Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography to classify and quantify plaque volumes in the proximal coronary system: a comparative study using intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 47(3):672–677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Choi EK, Choi SI, Rivera JJ et al (2008) Coronary computed tomography angiography as a screening tool for the detection of occult coronary artery disease in asymptomatic individuals. J Am Coll Cardiol 52(5):357–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Blumenthal RS, Hwang CW, Nasir K (2009) Selective use of coronary artery calcium screening: worth the cost? J Am Coll Cardiol 54(14):1268–1270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Budoff MJ, Shaw LJ, Liu ST et al (2007) Long-term prognosis associated with coronary calcification: observations from a registry of 25,253 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 49(18):1860–1870

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Blaha M, Budoff MJ, Shaw LJ et al (2009) Absence of coronary artery calcification and all-cause mortality. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2(6):692–700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Henneman MM, Schuijf JD, Pundziute G et al (2008) Noninvasive evaluation with multislice computed tomography in suspected acute coronary syndrome: plaque morphology on multislice computed tomography versus coronary calcium score. J Am Coll Cardiol 52(3):216–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bauer RW, Thilo C, Chiaramida SA et al (2009) Noncalcified atherosclerotic plaque burden at coronary CT angiography: a better predictor of ischemia at stress myocardial perfusion imaging than calcium score and stenosis severity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193(2):410–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M et al (2006) Prevalence of noncalcified coronary plaques by 64-slice computed tomography in patients with an intermediate risk for significant coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 48(2):312–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rivera JJ, Nasir K, Cox PR et al (2009) Association of traditional cardiovascular risk factors with coronary plaque sub-types assessed by 64-slice computed tomography angiography in a large cohort of asymptomatic subjects. Atherosclerosis 206(2):451–457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yun CH, Schlett CL, Rogers IS et al (2009) Association between diabetes and different components of coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden as measured by coronary multidetector computed tomography. Atherosclerosis 205(2):481–485

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Funabashi N, Asano M, Komuro I (2007) Predictors of non-calcified plaques in the coronary arteries of 242 subjects using multislice computed tomography and logistic regression models. Int J Cardiol 117(2):191–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bamberg F, Dannemann N, Shapiro MD et al (2008) Association between cardiovascular risk profiles and the presence and extent of different types of coronary atherosclerotic plaque as detected by multidetector computed tomography. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 28(3):568–574

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Isma’eel H, Tellalian D, Hamirani YS et al (2010) Effect of obesity on coronary artery plaque using 64 slice multidetector cardiac computed tomography angiography. Int J Cardiol 140(3):358–360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Strandberg TE, Strandberg AY, Salomaa VV et al (2009) Explaining the obesity paradox: cardiovascular risk, weight change, and mortality during long-term follow-up in men. Eur Heart J 30(14):1720–1727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the statistical analysis from the Medical Research Collaborating Center at Seoul National University Hospital and Seoul National University College of Medicine. This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MEST) (No. 2010-0023504).

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eun Ju Chun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yoo, D.H., Chun, E.J., Choi, S.I. et al. Significance of noncalcified coronary plaque in asymptomatic subjects with low coronary artery calcium score: assessment with coronary computed tomography angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27 (Suppl 1), 27–35 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-011-9968-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-011-9968-1

Keywords

Navigation