Abstract
Objective: To estimate the percentage of California smokers who visit physicians each year and thus determine the extent of the opportunity for physicians to advise their smoking patients to quit; to identify sociodemographic and other characteristics related to smokers’ reporting that advice was given; and to look for evidence that physician advice influences quitting behavior.
Setting and design: Data were collected as part of the 1990 California Tobacco Survey, a large (n=24,296) population-based telephone survey.
Participants: 9,796 current smokers, including 5,559 daily smokers who had visited a physician in the preceding year.
Measurements and main results: Two-thirds of all smokers had visited a physician in the year before the interview, but only about 5 0% of Hispanic and Asian smokers had done so. Multivariate analysis showed that advice at the last visit was independently related to older age, higher cigarette consumption, and poorer perceived health. Compared with smokers never advised to quit by a physician, those advised to quit at the last visit were 1.61 (95% confidence interval, 1.31–1 98) times more likely to report a quit attempt in the preceding year and 1.90 (95% confidence interval, 1.45–2.48) times more likely to be preparing to quit; however, those advised previously but not at the last visit showed no more quitting activity than did smokers never advised to quit.
Conclusion: Physicians have considerable opportunity to reach all demographic subgroups of the population, but the nature of the subgroups advised most (those who are older, have high consumption of cigarettes, or have poor health) suggests that physicians tend to treat such advice as a therapeutic rather than a preventive intervention. Physician advice at the most recent visit encourages patients to think about quitting and probably leads to quit attempts. Thus, it is vital that physicians perform the simple intervention of advising every smoker to quit at every visit.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Reducing the health consequences of smoking: 25 years of progress. A report of the Surgeon General. DHHS (PHS) Publication No. (CDC) 89-8411. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1989.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Promoting health/prevention disease: Year 2000 objectives for the nation. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1989;59.
Gritz ER. Cigarette smoking: the need for action by health professionals. CA Cancer J Clin. 1988;38:195–211.
Wechsler H, Levin S, Idelson RK, Rothman M, Taylor JD. The physician’s role in health promotion—a survey of primary care practitioners. N Engl J Med. 1983;308:97–100.
Russell MAH, Wilson C, Taylor C, Baker CD. Effects of general practitioners’ advice against smoking. BMJ. 1983;287:1782–5.
Wilson DM, Taylor W, Gilbert JR, et al. A randomized trial of a family physician intervention for smoking cessation. JAMA. 1988;260:1570–4.
Kottke TE, Brekke ML, Solberg LI, Hughes JR. A randomized trial to increase smoking intervention by physicians: doctors helping smokers, round l. JAMA. 1989;261:2101–6.
Cohen SJ, Stookey GK, Katz BP, Drook CA, Smith DM. Encouraging primary care physicians to help smokers quit. Ann Intern Med. 1989;110:648–52.
Ockene JK, Kristeller J, Goldberg R, et al. Increasing the efficacy of physician-delivered smoking interventions: a randomized clinical trial. J Gen Intern Med. 1991;6:1–8.
Glynn TJ, Manley MW, Pechacek TF. Physician-initiated smoking cessation program: the National Cancer Institute Trials. In: Engstrom PF, Rimer B, Mortenson LE (eds). Advances in cancer control: screening and prevention research. New York: Wiley-Liss, 1990;11–25.
Waksberg J. Sampling methods for random digit dialing. J Am Stat Assoc. 1978;73:40–6.
Efron B. The jackknife, the bootstrap and other resampling plans. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1982.
Rao JNK, Scott AJ. The analysis of categorical data from complex sample surveys: chi-square tests for goodness of fit and independence in two-way tables. J Am Stat Assoc. 1981;76:221–30.
SAS Technical Report P-200. Release 6.04. Cary, NC: The SAS Institute, 1990;175–230.
Centers for Disease Control. The health benefits of smoking cessation: a report of the Surgeon General, 1990. DHHS Publication No. (CDC) 90-8416. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1990;607–10.
Anda RF, Remington PL, Sienko DG, Davis RM. Are physicians advising smokers to quit? JAMA. 1987;257:1916–9.
Gilpin E, Pierce J, Goodman J, Giovino G, Berry C, Burns D. Trends in physicians’ advice to quit smoking. Tobacco Control. 1992;1:31–5.
Frank E, Winkleby MA, Altman DG, Rockhill B, Fortmann SP. Predictors of physicians’ smoking cessation advice. JAMA. 1991;266:3139–44.
Valente CM, Sobal J, Muncie HL, Levine DM, Antlitz AM. Health promotion: physicians’ beliefs, attitudes and practices. Am J Prev Med. 1986;2:82–8.
Cummings KM, Giovino G, Sciandra R, Koenigsberg M, Emont SL. Physician advice to quit smoking: who gets it and who doesn’t. Am J Prev Med. 1987;3:69–74.
Ockene JK, Hosmer DW, Williams JW, et al. The relationship of patient characteristics to physician delivery of advice to stop smoking. J Gen Intern Med. 1987;2:337–40.
Wells KB, Lewis CE, Leake B, Schleiter MK, Brook RH. The practices of general and subspecialty internists in counseling about smoking and exercise. Am J Public Health. 1986;76:1009–13.
Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983;51:390–5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by Contract#89-97872 from the California Department of Health Services, Tobacco Control Section, and Contract#64182 from the County of Los Angeles Tobacco Control Section.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gilpin, E.A., Pierce, J.P., Johnson, M. et al. Physician advice to quit smoking. J Gen Intern Med 8, 549–553 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02599637
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02599637