Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Factors associated with perceived risk of breast cancer among women attending a screening program

  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A person's perception of the risk of, or susceptibility to, developing a disease is believed to be an important determinant of health-related behavior, yet little is known about the determinants of perceived risk. Knowledge of these correlates may be useful in identifying and addressing barriers to performance of health behaviors such as mammography screening. Data collected from over 36,000 women participating in a breast cancer screening program in Texas were used to examine the associations between perceived risk of ever getting breast cancer and a number of demographic factors, health-related behaviors, and risk factors for breast cancer. There was a strong positive association between family history of breast cancer and risk perception (OR=11.3, CI=10.34−12.35). Women who reported other risk factors for breast cancer also reported higher perceived risk, but those associations were of lesser magnitude. Age was inversely associated with perceived risk, and black, but not Hispanic, women were more likely to perceive their risk as high compared with white women. Of the health-related behaviors for the early detection of breast cancer, only having had a prior mammogram was associated with perceived risk. Educational interventions to heighten women's awareness of breast cancer risk factors may increase perceived risk in high risk women and influence their decision to undergo screening mammography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S: Why study risk perception? Risk Anal 2:83–93, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rosenstock IM: The Health Belief Model and preventive health behavior. Health Educ Monogr 2:354–386, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Janz NK, Becker MH: The Health Belief Model: a decade later. Health Educ Q 11:1–47, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burack RC, Liang J: The early detection of cancer in the primary-care setting: factors associated with the acceptance and completion of recommended procedures. Prev Med 16:739–751, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burack RC, Liang J: The acceptance and completion of mammography by older black women. Am J Public Health 79:721–726, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Calnan M: The Health Belief Model and participation in programmes for the early detection of breast cancer: a comparative analysis. Soc Sci Med 19:823–830, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rutledge DN, Hartmann WH, Kinman PO, Winfield AC: Exploration of factors affecting mammography behaviors. Prev Med 17:412–422, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lerman C, Rimer B, Trock B, Balshem A, Engstrom PF: Factors associated with repeat adherence to breast cancer screening. Prev Med 19:279–290, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Polednak AP, Lane DS, Burg MA: Risk perception, family history and use of breast cancer screening tests. Cancer Detect Prev 15:257–263, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zapka JG, Stoddard AM, Costanza ME, Greene HL: Breast cancer screening by mammography: utilization and associated factors. Am J Public Health 79:1499–1502, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vogel VG, Peters GN, Evans WP, et al: Design and conduct of a low-cost mammography screening project: experience of the American Cancer Society, Texas Division. Am J Roentgenol 158:51–54, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  12. SPSS-X User's Guide, 3rd edition: SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, 1988.

  13. BMDP Statistical Software: 1983 printing with additions. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bondy ML, Vogel VG, Halabi S, Lustbader ED: Identification of women at increased risk for breast cancer in a population-based screening program. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention 1:143–147, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Taplin S, Anderman C, Grothaus L: Breast cancer risk and participation in mammographic screening. Am J Public Health 79:1494–1498, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  16. National Research Council: Improving Risk Communication. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nelkin D: Communicating technological risk: the social construction of risk perception. Annu Rev Public Health 10:95–113, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Slovic P: Informing and educating the public about risk. Risk Anal 6:403–415, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Covello V, von Winterfeldt D, Slovic P: Risk communication: a review of the literature. Risk Abstracts 3:171–182, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fessenden-Raden J, Fitchen J, Heath J: Providing risk information in communities: factors influencing what is heard and accepted. Science Technology and Human Values 12:94–101, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kasperson RE, Renn O, Slovic P, Brown HS, Emel J, Goble R, Kasperson JX, Ratick S: The social amplification of risk: a conceptual framework. Risk Anal 8:177–187, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rappaport RA: Toward postmodern risk analysis. Risk Anal 8:189–191, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rip A: Should social amplification of risk be counteracted? Risk Anal 8:193–197, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stern PC: Learning through conflict: a realistic strategy for risk communication. Policy Sciences 24:99–119, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fitchen JM, Heath JS, Fessenden-Raden J: Risk perception in community context: a case study.In: Johnson BB, Covello VT (eds) The Social and Cultural Construction of Risk. D. Reidel Publishing Co., Boston, Massachusetts, 1987, pp 31–54.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ajzen I, Fishbein M: Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviors. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Harding CM, Eiser JR: Characterising the perceived risk and benefits of some health issues. Risk Anal 4:131–141, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Costanza ME, D'Orsi CJ, Greene HL, Gaw VP, Karellas A, Zapka JG: Feasibility of universal screening mammography: lessons from a community intervention. Arch Intern Med 151:1851–1856, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cockburn J, Murphy B, Schofield P, Hill D, Borland R: Development of a strategy to encourage attendance for screening mammography. Health Educ Res 6:279–290, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Reynolds HE, Jackson VP: Self-referred mammography patients: analysis of patients' characteristics. Am J Roentgenol 157:481–488, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Vogel VG, Graves DS, Vernon SW, Lord JA, Winn RJ, Peters GN: Mammographic screening of women with increased risk of breast cancer. Cancer 66:1613–1620, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kaplan KM, Weinberg GB, Small A, Herndon JL: Breast cancer screening among relatives of women with breast cancer. Am J Public Health 81:1174–1179, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Vernon SW, Vogel VG, Halabi S, Jackson GL, Lundy RO, Peters GN: Breast cancer screening behaviors and attitudes in three racial/ethnic groups. Cancer 69:165–174, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rimer BK, Keintz KM, Kessler HB, Engstrom PF, Rosan JR: Why women resist screening mammography: patient-related barriers. Radiology 172:243–246, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rimer BK, Trock B, Engstrom PF, Lerman C, King E: Why do some women get regular mammograms? Am J Prev Med 7:69–74, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, P.O. Box 20186, 77225, Houston, Texas, USA

    Sally W. Vernon Ph.D.

  2. Section of Community Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA

    Victor G. Vogel M.D., M.H.S., Susan Halabi M.P.H. & Melissa L. Bondy Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Sally W. Vernon Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Victor G. Vogel M.D., M.H.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Susan Halabi M.P.H.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Melissa L. Bondy Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vernon, S.W., Vogel, V.G., Halabi, S. et al. Factors associated with perceived risk of breast cancer among women attending a screening program. Breast Cancer Res Tr 28, 137–144 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00666426

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00666426

Key words

Search

Navigation