Table 2

Sensitivity analysis—overall and subpopulation estimates of AFARDS, AFAHRF and AFAHRF-UL

Sensitivity analysisModel 1: AFARDS
(non-AHRF controls)
Model 2: AFARDS (AHRF-UL controls)





Model 3: AFAHRF
(non-AHRF controls)
Model 4: AFAHRF-UL
(non-AHRF controls)
Unmatched analysisUnmatched analysisMatched analysis—hospital mortality as outcomeUnmatched analysisUnmatched analysis
Patients with ARDS/AHRF265326538513504851
Controls840785185184078407
Overall AF25.2% (22.7%–27.6%)22.3% (14.4%–30.1%)17.7% (7.7%–27.6%)26.5% (23.9%–29.1%)5.9% (4.1%–7.7%)
PaO2/FiO2 ratio (mm Hg)
 >2008.9% (4.5%–13.4%)10.7% (−1.6%–23.0%)25.8% (7.6%–43.9%)10.6% (6.3%–15.0%)2.5% (=2.5%–7.5%)
 100–20017.2% (13.4%–21.1%)23.6% (13.2%–34.0%)3.1% (−13.7%–19.9%)18.9% (15.2%–22.7%)3.6% (1.3%–8.5%)
 <10014.5% (10.7%–18.5%)33.9% (25.9%–41.9%)35.0% (18.9%–51.2%)15.6% (11.7%–19.5%)1.6% (−3.5%–6.7%)
Maximum number of quadrants involved in first 48 hours
 One3.9% (−1.0%–8.8%)3.9% (−1.0%–8.8%)
 Two11.3% (7.0%–15.6%)9.7% (−2.9%–22.4%)12.0% (−5.3%–29.4%)12.8% (8.6%–17.0%)2.3% (−2.7%–7.3%)
 Three10.8% (6.6%–15.1%)20.0% (9.7%–30.2%)18.3% (−1.8%–38.5%)10.9% (6.6%–15.1%)
 Four18.8% (15.1%–22.4%)36.4% (28.2%–44.6%)22.3% (7.0%–37.6%)18.7% (15.1%–22.4%)
Subphenotype
 Hypoinflammatory18.3% (14.4%–22.1%)21.3% (10.2%–32.4%)14.1% (1.9%–26.3%)
 Hyperinflammatory19.4% (15.9%–23.0%)31.9% (22.4%–41.5%)25.9% (7.4%–44.4%)
  • Our primary analysis used matching without replacement with ICU mortality as the primary outcome measure. We repeated the analysis without matching in all four models to examine how matching—and therefore selection of controls, affected AF estimates. The matched analysis was also conducted using hospital mortality (instead of ICU mortality) as the outcome measure in model 2.

  • AF, attributable fraction; AHRF, acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure; AHRF-UL, acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure with unilateral infiltrates only; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; ICU, intensive care unit.