Table 1

Input parameters of the model per person-year

ParameterBase valueProbability distributionSource
GOLD IIGOLD IIIGOLD IVGOLD IIGOLD IIIGOLD IV
Initial distributions0.260.40.34NANANAAlbert et al 4
Baseline age65NAAlbert et al 4
Transition probability (95% CI)Hoogendoorn et al 9
Ex-smokers0.034 (0.033 to 0.035)0.030 (0.028 to 0.031)NABeta (5703, 162 046)Beta (1372, 44 377)NA
Current smokers0.037 (0.036 to 0.038)0.031 (0.029 to 0.032)NABeta (6206, 161 543)Beta (1418, 44 332)NA
Exacerbation rate in the reference group (95% CI)Hoogendoorn et al 10
Total exacerbations1.17 (0.93 to 1.50)1.61 (1.51 to 1.74)2.10 (1.51 to 2.94)Lognormal (0.16, 0.13)Lognormal (0.48, 0.04)Lognormal (0.74, 0.17)
Severe exacerbations0.16 (0.07 to 0.33)0.22 (0.20 to 0.23)0.28 (0.14 to 0.63)Lognormal (−1.83, 0.37)Lognormal (−1.51, 0.02)Lognormal (−1.27, 0.40)
Rate ratio of exacerbation (total and severe) by 12-month history pattern (95% CI)ECLIPSE study32
(online supplemental appendix 4)
No exacerbations in the first yearTotal: 0.16 (0.14 to 0.17)Total: normal (0.160, 0.007)
Severe: 0.16 (0.12 to 0.20)Severe: normal (0.16, 0.02)
≥1 moderate/severe exacerbations in the first year1 (Reference)NA
≥2 moderate or ≥1 severe exacerbation in the first yearTotal: 1.25 (1.16 to 1.33)Normal (1.25, 0.04)
Severe: 1.36 (1.17 to 1.58)Normal (1.36, 0.10)
≥2 moderate/severe exacerbations in the first yearTotal: 1.30 (1.20 to 1.40)Normal (1.30, 0.05)
Severe: 1.26 (1.07 to 1.48)Normal (1.26, 0.10)
Relative risk of exacerbation in the treatment group compared with the control group (95% CI)
Total0.73 (0.63 to 0.84)Lognormal (−0.31, 0.07)Albert et al 4
Ex-smokers0.65 (0.55 to 0.77)Lognormal (−0.43, 0.08)Han et al 25
Current smokers0.99 (0.71 to 1.38)Lognormal (−0.01, 0.17)Han et al 25
Decline in treatment effectRR0 exp (– k * (year – 1))
RR0: first-year effect
k=0.22
FixedPomares et al 13
(online supplemental appendix 1)
Rate of mortality due to exacerbations (95% CI)0.156 (0.109 to 0.203)Beta (35.6, 192.4) Hoogendoorn et al 11
Hazard ratio of cardiovascular death in the first 5 days (95% CI)2.88 (1.79 to 4.63)Lognormal (1.06, 0.24)Ray et al 6
Relative risk of hearing loss due to azithromycin (95% CI)1.168 (1.030 to 1.325)Lognormal (0.15, 0.06)Li et al 5
Annual incidence of hearing loss (95% CI)0.023 (0.011 to 0.035)Normal (0.023, 0.006)Lin et al 17
(online supplemental appendix 2)
Prevalence of GI symptoms in the population0.332 (0.326 to 0.333)Beta (28 945, 58 768) Almario et al 18
Relative risk of GI symptoms due to azithromycin (95% CI)1.187 (0.761 to 1.849)Lognormal (0.17, 0.22)Li et al 5
Baseline utility
(EQ-5D) (95% CI)
0.787
(0.771 to 0.802)
0.750
(0.731 to 0.768)
0.647 (0.598 to 0.695)Beta (2251, 609.4)Beta (1666, 555.5)Beta (245.7, 134.1)Rutten-van Mölken et al 33
Decrease in utility due to exacerbations (95% CI)Sadatsafavi et al 34
(online supplemental appendix 3)
Mild and moderate0.015 (0.002 to 0.040)0.049 (0.020 to 0.090)0.049 (0.020 to 0.090)Beta (2.08, 132.50)Beta (7.19, 140.30)Beta (7.19, 140.30)
Severe and very severe0.068 (0.035 to 0.110)0.065 (0.030 to 0.100)0.065 (0.030 to 0.100)Beta (11.92, 162.60)Beta (12.7, 182.1)Beta (12.7, 182.1)
Decrease in utility due to hearing loss (95% CI)0.187 (0.167 to 0.207)Beta (6.92, 30.08)NICE Guideline21
Utility improvement due to hearing aids (95% CI)0.060 (0.044 to 0.073)Normal (0.060, 0.006)Barton et al 35
Decrease in utility due to the GI symptoms (95% CI)0.026
(0.024 to 0.028)
Beta (66 343, 2 475 535)Sullivan and Ghushchyan36
(online supplemental appendix 3)
Discount rate3%NASanders et al 8
  • ECLIPSE, Evaluation of COPD Longitudinally to Identify Predictive Surrogate Endpoints; EQ-5D, EuroQol 5-Dimensional ; GI, gastrointestinal; GOLD, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease; NA, not applicable; NICE, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.