Table 4

Comparison of clinical outcomes following pulmonary rehabilitation between PR-min and PR-gym groups

Change with PRBetween-group differencesTest statisticP value
PR- min
(n=204)
PR-gym
(n=232)
ISW (m)56.6 (47.8 to 65.4)59.7 (50.9 to 68.6)−3.1 (−15.6 to 9.4)−0.490.63
CRQ-dyspnoea5.8 (4.9 to 6.7)4.2 (3.4 to 5.0)1.6 (0.4 to 2.8)2.630.009
CRQ-fatigue2.8 (2.1 to 3.4)3.0 (2.4 to 3.6)−0.2 (−1.1 to 0.7)−0.510.61
CRQ-emotion4.3 (3.2 to 5.3)4.3 (3.3 to 5.3)−0.02 (−1.5 to 1.4)−0.040.97
CRQ-mastery2.6 (1.9 to 3.2)3.0 (2.4 to 3.7)−0.4 (−1.4 to 0.5)−0.900.37
CRQ-total15.5 (12.9 to 18.2)14.6 (12.2 to 17.2)0.9 (−2.7 to 4.5)0.490.62
  • Data expressed as mean (95% CI) or median (25th and 75th percentiles) pre-to-post PR.

  • Data were analysed using independent t-tests (or Mann-Whitney U test for data that were not normally distributed). All participants had data for each of the listed variables.

  • CRQ, Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire; ISW, incremental shuttle walk; PR, pulmonary rehabilitation; PR-gym, pulmonary rehabilitation using specialist equipment; PR-min, pulmonary rehabilitation using minimal equipment.