Table 1

A summary of included studies

Author (year)Patient group designOPEP deviceTreatment durationFollow-upControlResults of OPEP group compared with corresponding groups
Aggarwal (2010)24 Hospitalised AECOPD
RCT
Flutter n=1515 mins, 3 x per day, for 5 daysEvery day Control 1: ACBT n=15
Control 2: pursed lip breathing n=15
Flutter and ACBT had the same effect on lung function compared with pursed lip breathing (ΔPEFR; +30 L/min)
Flutter reduced hospital stay compared with ACBT and pursed lip breathing (3/5/5 days).
Cegla (2002)25 Stable COPD FEV1 40%±14%
RCT
RC-Cornet plus UC n=25>5 mins, 3 x per day, for 2 yearsEvery 3 monthsUC n=25RC-Cornet had the same effect as UC on lung function (ΔFVC%; predicted +2%)
RC-Cornet reduced antibiotic use compared with UC (12/25 vs 24/25)
RC-Cornet reduced exacerbations over 2 years compared with UC (5/25 vs 12/25)
RC-Cornet had the same effect as UC on hospital stays (17 vs 18 days).
McCarroll (2005)31 Stable COPD with hypersecretion
RCT
Acapella plus PR n=1210 mins, 2 x per week, for 8 weeksEvery 4 weeks Control 1: UC n=11
Control 2: PR n=12 (2 sessions per week, for 8 weeks)
Acapella had the same effect as UC and PR on lung function (Δ FEV1 and PEFR; +0.28 L/min and +16 L/min)
Improvement in exercise capacity did not differ significantly between UC and PR (Δ6MWD; +44 m vs +54 m).
Nicolini (2018)26 Stable COPD
FEV1=31%±10%
RCT
Lung Flute plus UC n=4030 mins, 2 x per day, for 12 days and then 26 weeks follow-upEvery 4 weeks Control 1: Flutter n=40 (30 mins, 2 x per day, for 12 days and then 26 weeks follow-up)
Control 2: UC n=40
Lung Flute and Flutter reduced exacerbations compared with UC (7/40 vs 9/40 vs 11/40)
Lung Flute and Flutter improved exercise capacity vs UC (Δ6MWD; +18.4 m/+11.5 m / −4.8 m)
Lung Flute, Flutter, and UC; no difference in cough or sputum clearance (Δ BCSS score; −3/−3.1/−3.5)
Lung Flute and Flutter improved HRQoL compared with UC (Δ CAT score; –7.5/–6.4/−1.6)
Lung Flute and Flutter reduced dyspnoea compared with UC (ΔMMRC score; –0.6/–0.4/+0.1).
Sethi (2015)27 Stable COPD with sputum production, FEV1 50%±3%
RCT
Lung Flute plus UC n=335 mins, 2 x per day for 26 weeksEvery 8 weeksUC n=36Lung Flute reduced symptoms compared with UC (Δ CCQ score; −0.23 vs +0.01)
Lung Flute improved HRQoL compared with UC (ΔSGRQ score; −3.23 vs −1.85, p=0.03)
Lung Flute reduced exacerbations compared with UC (6/33 vs 14/36, p=0.03)
Lung Flute improved exercise capacity compared with UC (Δ6MWD;+7 m vs −42 m).
Svenningsen (2016)28 Stable COPD- sputum producer vs non-sputum producer
FEV1 60%±18%
RXT
Aerobika plus UC n=2720 mins, 4 x per day, for 3 weeks (1 week intervention, 1 week washout, and 1 week UC)Not reportedUCAerobika improved lung function compared with UC (Δ FVC% predicted;+6%, p=0.005)
Aerobika improved HRQoL compared with UC (ΔSGRQ score; −9, p=0.01).
Aerobika improved sputum clearance compared with UC (ΔPEQ- ease-bringing-up-sputum; −1.2, p=0.005)
Aerobika improved exercise capacity compared with UC (Δ 6MWD;+19 m, p=0.04)
Aerobika improved regional ventilation compared with UC (Δ 3He MRI ventilation deficit percent; −1%).
Weiner, (1996)29 Stable COPD
FEV1 35%±8.5% predicted
RCT
Flutter n=1010 mins, 4–8 x per day for 3 months.Not reportedSham Flutter 10 mins, 4–8 times/day for 3 months. n=10Flutter and Sham Flutter no effect on lung function (ΔFVC% predicted +2% vs +2%)
Flutter improved exercise capacity vs Sham Flutter (Δ12-minute walk distance; +649 m vs +538 m).
Wolkove, (2004)30 Stable COPD with sputum production and smoking history
FEV1 50%±15%
RXT
Flutter plus UC n=1510 mins, 4x per day, for 1 weekEvery weekSham Flutter 10 mins, 4x per day, for 1 weekFlutter improved lung function vs Sham Flutter (Δ FVC%; +24%, p=0.05)
Flutter improved exercise capacity vs Sham Flutter (Δ 6MWD; +10 m, p=0.05)
Flutter reduced dyspnoea vs Sham Flutter (Δ Borg scale; +1, p=0.05).
  • Δ, data presented as mean difference in absolute values between groups; ACBT, active cycle of breathing technique; AECOPD, acute exacerbations of COPD; BCSS, Breathlessness, Cough and Sputum Scale; C, control; CAT, COPD assessment test; CCQ, Clinical COPD Questionnaire; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC, forced vital capacity; 3He, hyperpolarised 3 helium; HRQoL, health-related quality of life; I, intervention; MMRC, Modified Medical Research Council; 6MWD, Six-minutes Walking Distance; OPEP, oscillatory positive expiratory pressure; PEFR, peak expiratory flow rate; PEQ, Patient Evaluation Questionnaire; PR, pulmonary rehabilitation; RCT, randomised controlled trial; RXT, randomised cross-over trial; SGRQ, St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire; UC, usual care.