Summary of key randomised controlled trials comparing different treatment strategies in potentially resectable N2 NSCLC
Study | Notes | Study arms | Recruitment | Primary endpoint | Results |
Induction chemotherapy followed by surgery versus induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy | |||||
EORTC 08941 van Meerbeeck et al 5 |
| Three cycles of induction chemotherapy: if response, randomise: surgical resection versus 60–62.5 Gy in 30–32 fractions. | 1994–2002 Target 358 patients 332 randomised | 5-year OS | 15.7% vs 14% HR 1.06 (0.84–1.35), p=0.596 |
Induction chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection versus definitive chemoradiotherapy | |||||
Intergroup 0139 Albain et al 6 |
| Two cycles of induction chemotherapy. Induction radiotherapy 45 Gy. If stable disease, randomise: surgical resection versus complete radiotherapy to 61 Gy. | 1994–2001 Target 612 patients 429 recruited | 5-year OS | 27% vs 20% HR 0.87 (0.7–1.1), p=0.24 |
ESPATUE Trial Eberhardt et al 11 |
| Three cycles of induction chemotherapy. Induction chemoradiotherapy (45 Gy+one cycle chemotherapy). If remains resectable, randomise: surgical resection versus chemoradiotherapy boost. | 2004–2013 Target 300 patients 246 recruited 161 randomised following induction. | 5-year OS | 44% vs 40%, p=0.34 Overall survival at 5 years for all 246 recruited patients was 34.1%. |
Induction chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery versus induction chemotherapy followed by surgery | |||||
SAKK Trial Pless et al 10 |
| Three cycles of induction chemotherapy versus 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy plus 44 Gy radiotherapy. All patients for surgical resection after induction treatment. | 2001–2012 Target 240 patients 232 recruited Stopped at third analysis. | EFS | 11.6 vs 12.8 months HR 1.1 (0.8–1.4), p=0.67 No significant difference in OS. |
EBUS, endobronchial ultrasound; EFS, event-free survival; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; OS, overall survival; PET, positron emission tomography; PFS, progression-free survival.