Table 1

Lung cancer screening scan results: comparison of Queensland Lung Cancer Screening Study original definitions, Lung-RADS criteria, PanCan Model and differing nodule size thresholds

Baseline roundPositive* Negative
d4128 (50.0) 128 (50.0)
d664 (25.0)CT scans n=256 (100.0)192 (75.0)
d832 (12.5) 224 (87.5)
Lung-RADS56 (21.9) 200 (78.1)
PanCan Model18 (7.0) 238 (93.0)
TPFPNATNFNNA
d45 (2.0)123 (48.0)0 (0.0)127 (49.6)0 (0.0)1 (0.4)
d65 (2.0)59 (23.0)0 (0.0)191 (74.6)0 (0.0)1 (0.4)
d85 (2.0)27 (10.5)0 (0.0)223 (87.1)0 (0.0)1 (0.4)
Lung-RADS5 (2.0)51 (19.9)0 (0.0)199 (77.7)0 (0.0)1 (0.4)
PanCan Model5 (2.0)13 (5.1)0 (0.0)237 (92.6)0 (0.0)1 (0.4)
Incidence roundsPositive Negative
d-All156 (33.1)316 (66.9)
d444 (9.3)CT scans n=472 (100.0)428 (90.7)
d626 (5.5) 446 (94.5)
d817 (3.6)455 (96.4)
Lung-RADS46 (9.7)426 (90.3)
TPFPNATNFNNA
d-All7 (1.5)149 (31.6)0 (0.0)310 (65.7)0 (0.0)6 (1.3)
d47 (1.5)37 (7.8)0 (0.0)422 (89.4)0 (0.0)6 (1.3)
d65 (1.1)21 (4.4)0 (0.0)438 (92.8)2 (0.4)6 (1.3)
d85 (1.1)12 (2.5)0 (0.0)447 (94.7)2 (0.4)6 (1.3)
Lung-RADS6 (1.3)39 (8.3)1 (0.2)420 (89.0)1 (0.2)5 (1.1)
  • Baseline (T0) and incidence (T1 and T2) screening rounds.

  • Data presented as count (%).

  • Criteria for positive baseline scan: d4 ≥4 mm threshold; d6 ≥6 mm threshold; d8 ≥8 mm threshold; Lung-RADS, Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System categories 3–4 and PanCan Model–Pan-Canadian multivariable logistic-regression risk model threshold ≥10%.

  • Criteria for positive incidence scan: d-All new or growing nodule(s) of any size; d4 ≥4 mm threshold; d6 ≥6 mm threshold; d8 ≥8 mm threshold and Lung-RADS categories 3–4.

  • *One baseline scan was positive due to non-nodule suspicious findings.

  • FN, false negative; FP, false positive; NA, not assessed; TN, true negative; TP, true positive.