Table 2

Differences between treatments (indacaterol plus tiotropium–tiotropium plus placebo) in FEV1 AUC5min–8h and trough FEV1 in patient subgroups analysed according to COPD severity, smoking status and ICS use*

Differences between indacaterol + tiotropium versus tiotropium + placebo
FEV1 AUC5min–8hTrough FEV1
Study 1Study 2Study 1Study 2
COPD severity
 Moderate120 ml (90 to 160) (n=233/237)§130 ml (90 to 160) (n=247/237)90 ml (50 to 130) (n=259/260)90 ml (60 to 120) (n=261/258)
 Severe or very severe130 ml (100 to 160) (n=272/267)110 ml (80 to 140) (n=283/267)70 ml (30 to 110) (n=302/289)60 ml (30 to 90) (n=304/306)
Smoking status
 Ex-smoker120 ml (90 to 150) (n=300/324)140 ml (110 to 170) (n=331/285)70 ml (40 to 110) (n=335/350)80 ml (60 to 110) (n=352/322)
 Current smoker130 ml (90 to 170) (n=205/180)90 ml (50 to 120) (n=199/219)80 ml (40 to 130) (n=226/199)60 ml (20 to 90) (n=213/242)
ICS use
 ICS non-users120 ml (90 to 160) (n=242/236)140 ml (100 to 170) (n=229/251)70 ml (30 to 110) (n=271/260)90 ml (60 to 120) (n=244/274)
 ICS users130 ml (100 to 160) (n=263/268)100 ml (70 to 140) (n=301/253)80 ml (50 to 120) (n=290/289)60 ml (30 to 90) (n=321/290)
  • Data are least squares means with 95% CI in parentheses. All treatment contrasts significant at p≤0.001.

  • * The interaction term for treatment by subgroup was non-significant in all cases (p>0.1).

  • Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2007.

  • Includes one patient (study 1, tiotropium group) with mild severity.

  • § Patient numbers are for indacaterol + tiotropium and tiotropium groups, respectively.

  • AUC5min–8h, area under the curve from 5 min to 8 h post dose; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC, forced vital capacity; ICS, inhaled corticosteroid.