Table 4 Effect of pulmonary rehabilitation in the 23 subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who completed all assessments (Evaluation 3)
Before PRAfter PRMean (SE) difference after PR (95% CI)p Value
Quadriceps MVC (N)312 (20)334 (23)22 (31) (9 to 35)0.002
6MWD (m)274 (13)333 (13)59 (33) (45 to 73)<0.001
Resting Borg score1.6 (0.2)0.9 (0.2)0.7 (1.2) (0.2 to 1.6)0.008
Peak Borg score4.6 (0.2)3.2 (0.3)1.4 (1.7) (0.7 to 2.1)<0.001
Leg activity
    % of time spent mobile50.0 (2.7)55.2 (2.6)5.2 (9.4) (1.2 to 9.3)0.014
    Mean activity score (×103 counts/h)81.5 (53.2)117.2 (84.2)35.7 (49) (14.5 to 56.9)0.002
    Mean intensity of activity score (×103 counts/h)156 (69.2)208.5 (123.4)52.5 (74.2) (20.4 to 84.6)0.001
Health status
    HAD Anxiety7.2 (1)5.6 (0.6)1.6 (3.2) (0.2 to 3.0)0.016
    HAD Depression6.4 (0.6)4.4 (0.6)2 (2.2) (1.0 to 2.9)<0.001
    SGRQ62.9 (2.5)47.8 (2.4)15.1 (12.5) (8.9 to 19.7)<0.001
    NEADL16.4 (0.5)18.2 (0.5)1.8 (1.7) (1.1 to 2.6)<0.001
  • Data shown are mean (SE).

  • HAD, Hospital Anxiety and Depression questionnaire score; 6MWD, six minute walking distance (metres); MVC, maximum voluntary contraction; NEADL, Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire; PR, pulmonary rehabilitation; SGRQ, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire.