Channick et al 2001132 R DB PCPbo vs Bos(250) in PAHDuration 12 weeksOutcomes: 1. 6MWD2. Haemodynamics, BDI, FC, TCW | n = 32 (M 4, F 28) (IPAH 27, CTD 5) | | Pbo | Bos | p Value | Elevated transaminases: Bos 2 (transient requiring no change in therapy) | |
| Pbo | Bos | II/III/IV | 1/8/2NS | 10/11/0* | |
n | 11 | 21 | 6MWD | 349NS | 430** | ** |
Age | 47 | 52 | RAP | +4.9 | −1.3 | * |
II/III/IV | 0/11/0 | 0/21/0 | mPAP | +5.1 | −1.6 | ** |
6M WD | 355 | 360 | PVR | +191 | −223 | * |
RAP | 9.9 | 9.7 | CI | −0.5 | +0.5 | * |
mPAP | 56 | 54 | p values vs baseline in same columnp values Bos vs Pbo (4th column) BDI 1.6 (95% CI 0.0 to 3.1) lower in Bos cf.PboTime to clinical worsening Bos>Pbo* |
PVR | 942 | 896 |
CI | 2.5 | 2.4 |
Rubin et al 2002135 BREATHE-1 R DB PC Pbo vs Bos(250) vs Bos(500) in PAH Duration 16 weeks Outcomes: 1. 6MWD 2. BDI, FC, TCW | n = 213 (M 45, F 168) IPAH 150, CTD 63. | Improvement in FC: | Worsening of pulmonary hypertension — Pbo 19%; Bos (combined) 8%Abnormal hepatic function — Pbo 3%; Bos (combined) 9% | Subgroup analysis of 6MWD: IPAH: Pbo vs Bos (combined) + 51 (NS) SSc: Pbo vs Bos (combined) + 43 (NS) |
| Pbo | Bos | Bos | | Pbo | Bos | Bos |
Dose | – | 250 | 500 | Dose | – | 250 | 500 |
n | 69 | 74 | 70 | Imp to II | 28% | 38%NS | 34%NS |
Age | 47 | 50 | 47 | Imp to I | 0% | 3%NS | 1%NS |
III/I V | 65/4 | 68/6 | 62/8 | Overall | 30% | 42%NS |
6M WD | 334 | 326 | 333 | | Pbo | Bos | Bos |
RAP | 8.9 | 9.7 | 9.9 | Dose | – | 250 | 500 |
mPAP | 53 | 53 | 57 | 6MW D | 326 | 353* | 379* |
PVR | 880 | 884 | 1167 | BDI | +0.3 | −0.1NS | −0.6** |
CI | 2.4 | 2.5 | 2.2 | Time to clinical worsening Bos>Pbo* |
Barst et al 200463 STRIDE-1R DB PCPbo vsSitax(100) vsSitax(300) in PAH Duration : 12 weeksOutcomes: 10% of predicted Vo2max2. 6MWD, FC, Vo2 and Ve/Vco2 at AT, SF36, TCW, haemodynamics | n = 178 (M 37, F 141) IPAH 94, CTD 42, CHD 42 | | Pbo | Sitax | Sitax | No differences between groups in the total number of adverse events. Incidence of serious adverse events: Pbo 15%; Sitax(100) 5%; Sitax(300) 16%).One death due to worsening PAH in Sitax(300). Most frequently reported clinical adverse events with Sitax were headache, peripheral oedema, nausea, nasal congestion, and dizziness. Significant interaction with warfarin led to significant rises in INR. Elevated transaminases (>3×ULN): Pbo 3%Sitax(100) 0%Sitax(300) 10% (NS) | When data combined with open label extension study, Kaplan–Meier estimate for elevated transaminases (>3xULN) at 9 months 8% for Sitax(100) and 32% for Sitax(300). As milder pts and pts with CHD included in this study unlike BREATHE-1, post hoc analysis examined end points when only pts with IPAH and CTD with baseline 6MW<450 in FC III/IV included. 6MW improvement for Sitax(combined) increased from +34 to +65′ |
Dose | – | 100 | 300 |
| Pbo | Sitax | Sitax | Improved FC | 15% | 29%** | 30%** |
Dose | – | 100 | 300 | Worsened FC | 7% | 0%NS | 2%NS |
n | 60 | 55 | 63 | 6MW | 400 | 416* | 407* |
Age | 48 | 45 | 44 | RAP | +1 | 0NS | −1* |
II/III/IV | 22/36/2 | 16/39/0 | 21/42/0 | mPAP | 0 | −3* | −5* |
6MWD | 413 | 394 | 387 | PVR | +49 | −221* | −194* |
RAP | 8 | 7 | 9 | CI | 0.0 | +0.3** | +0.4* |
mPAP | 52 | 54 | 54 | %pred Vo2max | −0.1 | −0.4 | +3.0NS |
PVR | 911 | 1026 | 946 | *, ** p vs Pbo |
CI | 2.4 | 2.3 | 2.3 | Time to clinical worsening SF-36, Vo2 and Ve/Vco2 at AT: |
%pred Vo2max | 48 | 45 | 45 | No significant differences between groups |
Galie et al 2006134 BREATHE-5R DB PC Pbo vs Bos(250) in CHD (aged>12) Duration: 16 weeks Outcomes: 1. Spo2, PVRI 2. Haemodynamics, 6MWD, FC | n = 54 (M 21, F 33) ASD 13, VSD 36, ASD+VSD 5 | | Pbo | Bos | p Value | Mean systemic arterial pressure rose by 2.5 in Pbo group and fell by 3.8 mm Hg in Bos group (difference 6.3 mm Hg, p = 0.028). Pbo/Bos(%)Peripheral oedema 6/19 Headache 12/14 Palpitations 0/11Chest pain 0/8(Severe intensity 18/8) Discontinuations 12/5 including 1 episode of elevated transaminases in Bos group | Drop in systemic arterial pressure in Bos group was well tolerated with only one episode of vasovagal syncope after first dose of Bos after 12 h of bed rest. |
| II/III/IV | 2/14/1NS | 13/23/1NS | |
| Pbo | Bos | 6MWD | 356 | 375 | * |
n | 17 | 37 | RAP | +0.4 | +0.3 | NS |
Age | 44 | 37 | LAP | +0.5 | +0.4 | NS |
II/III/IV | 0/17/0 | 0/37/0 | mPAP | +0.5 | −5 | ** |
Spo2 | 84 | 82 | PVRI | +155 | −317 | NS |
6M WD | 366 | 332 | SVRI | +379 | −373 | NS |
RAP | 5 | 6.1 | PFI | +0.0 | +0.1 | ** |
LAP | 6.5 | 8.1 | SFI | −0.2 | +0.9 | NS |
mPAP | 72 | 78 | p values for FC vs baseline |
PVR I | 2870 | 3425 | Spo2 Pbo corrected effect of Bos +1.0% |
SVR I | 3658 | 3244 |
PFI | 2.0 | 1.9 |
SFI | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Denton et al 2006133 R DB PC with OL EPAH CTD pts from extension studies from Channick et al132 and BREATHE-1135 (Bos(250 and 500)) Duration: 2 years | Initial treatment in PC trial | Bos | Pbo | At end of PC trial | Addition of Epo 1 Discontinuations 23 Death 5 Elevated transaminases 7 Worsening PAH 4Withdrawal of consent 2 Hepatitis 2 Anaemia 1 Pneumonia 1 Raised bilirubin 1 | Pts with significant interstitial lung disease (forced vital capacity <70% predicted) were excluded. |
n | 44 | 22 | | Bos | Pbo | p Value |
M/F | 6/38 | 5/17 | III/IV | NR | NR | |
Age | 58 | 50 | 6MWD | 332 | 358 | NS |
III/IV | 42/2 | 21/1 | Event-free survival at 16 weeks: Bos 90 vs Pbo 86%Mean duration of follow-up 1.8 years. Dose NROf 66 pts, 64 entered in to OL E study40 remained on Bos monotherapy at 1.8 years. In this group, FC had improved in 25% and 6MWD increased from 352 to 3671 year survival 86%2 year survival 73% |
SSc | 37 | 15 |
SLE | 5 | 3 |
Overlap syn | 1 | 3 |
Unclassified | 1 | 1 |
6MWD | 312 | 361 |
RAP | 8 | 8 |
mPAP | 47 | 45 |
CI | 2.4 | 2.5 |
PVR | 809 | 722 |
Barst et al 2006131 STRIDE-2R DB PCPbo vs Sitax(50) vs Sitax(100) vs Bos(250) open-labelDuration: 18 weeksOutcomes: 1. 6MWD 2. FC, BDI, TCW | n = 245 (M 55, F 190) IPAH 144, CTD 74, CHD 26 | Improvement in FC: | Adverse events – no differences between groups. Nasal congestion, fatigue and insomnia reported more frequently in Sitax groups (NS). Discontinuations: Pbo 10% Sitax(50) 7% Sitax(100) 3% Bos 10% (NS) Elevated transaminases (>3×ULN): Pbo 6% Sitax(50) 5% Sitax(100) 3% Bos 11% (NS) | Dividing the study population into four groups may have reduced the power to detect differences between treatment and placebo relating to time to clinical worsening. Open-label Bos arm makes any comparisons with this group problematic |
| Pbo | Sitax | Sitax | Bos |
| Pbo | Sitax | Sitax | Bos | Dose | – | 50 | 100 | 250 |
Dose | – | 50 | 100 | 250 | | 10% | NR | 13%NR | NR |
n | 62 | 62 | 61 | 60 | Improvement or no change in FC: |
Age | 53 | 57 | 55 | 49 | | 85% | NR | 98%** | NR |
II/III/IV | 23/35/4 | 21/38/3 | 26/34/1 | 22/37/1 | Worsening FC (p values NR): |
6MWD | 321 | 328 | 360 | 337 | | 13% | 13% | 2% | 9% |
mPAP | 49 | 48 | 45 | 50 | p vs PboTime to clinical worsening and BDI: No significant differences between groups |
PVR | 880 | 800 | 800 | 880 |
CI | 2.4 | 2.7 | 2.4 | 2.4 |
| | | | |