RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 EBUS-centred versus EUS-centred mediastinal staging in lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial JF Thorax JO Thorax FD BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Thoracic Society SP 261 OP 268 DO 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-203881 VO 69 IS 3 A1 Kang, Hyo Jae A1 Hwangbo, Bin A1 Lee, Geon-Kook A1 Nam, Byung-Ho A1 Lee, Hyun-Sung A1 Kim, Moon Soo A1 Lee, Jong Mog A1 Zo, Jae Ill A1 Lee, Hee Seok A1 Han, Ji-Youn YR 2014 UL http://thorax.bmj.com/content/69/3/261.abstract AB Background The impact of procedure sequence and primary procedure has not been studied in the combined application of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in lung cancer staging. Methods In a randomised controlled trial, 160 patients with histologically confirmed or strongly suspected potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer were enrolled (Group A, n=80, EBUS-centred; Group B, n=80, EUS-centred). EBUS-TBNA and EUS-FNA with an ultrasound bronchoscope were used as the first procedures in Groups A and B, respectively, and secondary procedures (EUS-FNA in Group A, EBUS-TBNA in Group B) were added. Results Diagnostic values were evaluated in 148 patients (74 in each group). In Groups A and B the diagnostic accuracy (93.2% (95% CI 87.5% to 99.0%) vs 97.3% (95% CI 93.6% to 101.0%), p=0.245) and sensitivity (85.3% (95% CI 68.9% to 95.0%) vs 92.0% (95% CI 74.0% to 99.0%), p=0.431) in detecting mediastinal metastasis were not statistically different. In Group A, adding EUS-FNA to EBUS-TBNA did not significantly increase the accuracy (from 91.9% to 93.2%, p=0.754) or sensitivity (from 82.4% to 85.3%, p=0.742). In group B, adding EBUS-TBNA to EUS-FNA increased the accuracy (from 86.5% to 97.3%, p=0.016) and sensitivity (from 60.0% to 92.0%, p=0.008). There were no intergroup differences in procedure time, cardiorespiratory parameters during procedures, complications or patient satisfaction. Conclusions Using a combination of EBUS-TBNA and EUS-FNA in mediastinal staging, we found that diagnostic values and patient satisfaction were not different between the EBUS-centred and EUS-centred groups. However, the necessity for EBUS-TBNA following EUS suggests that EBUS-TBNA is a better primary procedure in endoscopic mediastinal staging of potentially operable lung cancer. Trial Registration number ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01385111.