Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Expression of interferon-γ and its effect on cough hypersensitivity in chronic refractory cough patients
  1. Jiayang Sun1,2,
  2. Chen Zhan1,
  3. Zheng Deng1,
  4. Wei Luo1,
  5. Qiaoli Chen1,
  6. Mei Jiang1,
  7. Nanshan Zhong1,
  8. Kefang Lai1
  1. 1Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
  2. 2Department of Respiratory Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
  1. Correspondence to Professor Kefang Lai, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; klai{at}163.com

Abstract

Chronic refractory cough (CRC) is characterised by cough hypersensitivity. Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) has been reported to induce calcium influx, action potentials of vagal neurons in vitro and cough response in guinea pigs. While the effect of IFN-γ in CRC patients remains unknown. Here, via flow-cytometry and inhalation cough challenge, we found CRC patients had significantly increased levels of sputum IFN-γ+CD4+ T cells, IFN-γ+CD8+ T cells as well as supernatant of IFN-γ. The average number of coughs in CRC patients increased as the concentration of inhaled IFN-γ went up in IFN-γ cough challenge. Two or more coughs and five or more coughs elicited by inhaled IFN-γ in CRC patients occurred in 7 of 10 and 2 of 10, respectively. Preinhaled IFN-γ (100 µg/mL) increased the capsaicin cough sensitivity in CRC patients but not healthy volunteers. Targeting IFN-γ may be a potential effective anti-tussive strategy in CRC patients.

  • cough/mechanisms/pharmacology

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • JS, CZ and ZD are joint first authors.

  • JS, CZ and ZD contributed equally.

  • Contributors JS contributed to data collection, data analysis, draft and interpretation, revising of the submitted manuscript. CZ and ZD contributed to data analysis, draft and interpretation, revising of the submitted manuscript. WL and QC contributed to sputum induction and differential cell count. MJ contributed to data analysis and interpretation. KL and NZ contributed to study concept, design, manuscript preparation and critical review. All authors provided review of the manuscript and approved its submission.

  • Funding This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation ofChina (Award number: 81270151, 81100028, 81970013).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.