Article Text

other Versions

Download PDFPDF

Pulmonary puzzle
Wandering consolidation
  1. Tatsuyuki Kawahara1,
  2. Nobuaki Ochi1,
  3. Katsuya Kato2,
  4. Kentaro Shibamoto2,
  5. Yasunari Nagasaki1,
  6. Nozomu Nakagawa1,
  7. Hidekazu Nakanishi1,
  8. Hiromichi Yamane1,
  9. Yasumasa Monobe3,
  10. Nagio Takigawa1
  1. 1General Internal Medicine 4, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan
  2. 2Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan
  3. 3Pathology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan
  1. Correspondence to Dr Nobuaki Ochi, General Internal Medicine 4, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama 700-8505, Japan; placidus.aura{at}gmail.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Case presentation

A 47-year-old man developed chest pain and low-grade fever. He was diagnosed with pneumonia with parapneumonic pleural effusion using a chest X-ray image (figure 1A) and CT without contrast (figure 2A). Although he received azithromycin, followed by garenoxacin, imaging indicated worsening of the condition (figures 1B and 2B). As haemoptysis was observed, he was referred to our hospital.

Figure 1

Chest X-rays taken at the time of the first onset of illness (A), on the day of bronchoscopic examination (B), on the first day of prednisolone (0.5 mg/kg/day) treatment (C) and after prednisolone administration (0.5 mg/kg/day for 7 days and 1 mg/kg/day for 7 days) (D).

Figure 2

Chest CT scans obtained at the time of first onset of illness (A), at the time of the first visit to our hospital (B), on the day of bronchoscopic examination (C) and after prednisolone administration for 14 days (D). Arrowheads indicate the site for transbronchial lung biopsy.

He had never smoked and had been previously healthy except for atrial fibrillation that had been successfully treated via catheter ablation, without complications, 5 months previously. Physical examination revealed normal percussion and auscultation findings for both lungs, a blood pressure of 110/60 mm Hg, peripheral oxygen saturation of 97% at room air, a heart rate of 88/min without arrhythmia, a respiratory rate of 18 breaths/min and a body temperature of 36.8℃. Routine blood tests yielded no remarkable finding except a C reactive protein level of 30.2 mg/L. Bronchoalveolar lavage and transbronchial lung biopsy of the apicoposterior segment of the left upper lobe (figures 1C and 2C) were performed. The lavage fluid was clear and the cells included macrophages (90.2%), neutrophils (5.8%), eosinophils (0.2%) and lymphocytes (3.8%). Histological examination revealed some tissue plugs within the lumina of the small airways, part-extending into the alveolar ducts and alveoli. Two weeks after bronchoscopic examination, we prescribed prednisolone (0.5 mg/kg/day) because the infiltration had progressed to the left lower lung field. Although the consolidation transiently regressed, it became slightly worse 2 weeks after treatment (figure 1D). Although we increased prednisolone (to 1 mg/kg/day), opacities in the left upper lobe migrated (figure 2D).

Question

What is the differential diagnosis of this ‘wandering consolidation’?

Answer

Because of the poor response to prednisolone, we performed a contrast-enhanced CT scan, which revealed severe stenosis of the left upper and lower pulmonary veins (PVs) (figure 3A). Three-dimensional rendered CT angiography and lung perfusion scintigraphy revealed a total perfusion deficit of the left lung (figure 3C and figure 4) compared with the enhanced CT performed before catheter ablation in which the left upper and lower PVs were both intact (figure 3B,D). Re-evaluation of the transbronchial lung biopsy specimen revealed fibrous thickening of the interlobular septum and oedematous thickening of the alveolar wall, with congestive capillary proliferation (capillary haemangiomatosis) (figure 5), compatible with PV occlusion. The patient underwent pericardial patch venoplasty of the left PV stenosis without any lung resection, and recovered well and appears to have survived with no adverse consequences. Although his condition is not an extremely rare complication of catheter ablation, the clinical presentation and course of PV stenosis have not been well recognised. The common radiographic findings are consolidation and pleural effusion. Most patients were initially considered to have other pulmonary diseases such as bacterial pneumonia, lung cancer or a PE. A relatively small number of cases of PV stenosis have been diagnosed, as both the radiographic abnormalities and clinical symptoms are non-specific.1 Contrast-enhanced CT is most helpful in the diagnosis of PV stenosis.2 3 When physicians encounter a patient with diffuse lung consolidation who has undergone catheter ablation, PV stenosis should be considered in the differential diagnosis. Based on the chest images alone, cryptogenic organising pneumonia might be misdiagnosed, as in the present case.

Figure 3

Chest contrast-enhanced CT and three-dimensional rendered CT angiography. (A,C) Images taken 22 days after prednisolone (1 mg/kg/day) administration. (B,D) Images taken before catheter ablation. Arrowheads indicate left pulmonary veins.

Figure 4

A three-dimensional rendered CT angiogram and a perfusion lung scan were performed. (A,C) Anterior (ANT) views. (B,D) Posterior (POST) views. F, foot; H, head; L, left; P, posterior; R, right.

Figure 5

(A) Histologically, the transbronchial lung biopsy material revealed fibrous thickening of the interlobular septum and oedematous thickening of the alveolar wall with congestive capillary proliferation (capillary haemangiomatosis). (B) Cryptogenic organising pneumonia-like oedematous fibrosis and diffuse luminal oedematous fibrosis (arrowheads) were evident in the peripheral air space.

References

Footnotes

  • Contributors TK, NO and NT wrote the manuscript. YN, TK, NN, NO, HN, HY and NT treated the patient. KK and KS supervised the imaging analysis. YM supervised the histological diagnosis and capturing imaging.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles

  • Airwaves
    The Triumvirate