Article Text

other Versions

Download PDFPDF

Alleviating mechanical constraints to ventilation with heliox improves exercise endurance in adult survivors of very preterm birth
Free
  1. Joseph W Duke1,
  2. Amy M Zidron2,
  3. Igor M Gladstone3,
  4. Andrew T Lovering4
  1. 1Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA
  2. 2Department of Pediatrics, Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens, Ohio, USA
  3. 3Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
  4. 4Department of Human Physiology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Joseph W Duke, Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff AZ 86011, USA; JJ.Duke{at}nau.edu

Abstract

Adult survivors of very preterm birth (PRET) have significantly lower aerobic exercise capacities than their counterparts born at term (CONT), but the underlying cause is unknown. To test whether expiratory flow limitation (EFL) during exercise negatively affects exercise endurance in PRET, we had PRET and CONT exercise to exhaustion breathing air and again breathing heliox. In PRET, EFL decreased and time-to-exhaustion increased significantly while breathing heliox. Heliox had a minimal effect on EFL and had no effect on time-to-exhaustion in CONT. We conclude that aerobic exercise endurance in PRET is limited, in part, by mechanical ventilatory constraints, specifically EFL.

  • exercise
  • lung physiology
  • paediatric lung disaese

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Introduction

Adult survivors of preterm birth (PRET) have impaired pulmonary function1–6 and a lower aerobic exercise capacity than their counterparts born at term (CONT).1–5 The precise cause of the lower aerobic exercise capacity in PRET is unknown, but based on the characteristics of their respiratory system, could be impaired pulmonary gas exchange efficiency, mechanical ventilatory constraints and/or dyspnoea.

Impaired pulmonary gas exchange efficiency has not been detected in PRET relative to CONT1 2 7 even when PRET with a clinically mild reduction in diffusion  capacity  for carbon monoxide (DLCO) exercised while breathing hypoxic gas.2 Our work demonstrates that PRET have significant mechanical ventilatory constraints, specifically expiratory flow limitation (EFL), during exercise.3 4 PRET may have smaller airways than CONT,3 which would predispose them to having EFL. Breathing heliox (79% helium, 21% O2) during exercise lessens airflow resistance and EFL and, thus, allows previously constrained ventilation to increase.8 Indeed, heliox has been shown to alleviate EFL and increase exercise endurance in patients with COPD.9

Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine if breathing heliox during exercise decreases EFL and increases exercise endurance in PRET.

Methods

Subjects 

Thirty-three participants provided written informed consent prior to participation. Subjects included in the PRET group were born ≥8 weeks premature whether or not they had bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Diagnosis and classification of preterm birth and BPD, as well as matching of CONT subjects was done, as before.1–5

Visits 1–2

Baseline pulmonary function and DLCO and aerobic exercise capacity (VO2peak) and peak power output were determined on visits 1 and 2, respectively, as before.1–5

Visits 3–5

Subjects performed three constant load cycling time-to-exhaustion (TTE) trials at 80% of peak power output, as before.9 The protocol was identical between trials. Metabolic and ventilatory data throughout each trial and flow-volume loops (FVLs) were collected, as before.3 4 10 The extent of EFL (%EFL) was determined based on the percentage of the tidal volume that met or exceeded the maximal FVL, as before.3 4 10 Visit 3, performed while breathing air, served as a familiarisation trial. During the remaining TTEs, subjects were provided identical verbal feedback including standardised statements regarding the maintenance of cycling cadence. The gas composition (air or heliox) of the remaining TTEs was blinded to the subjects and they were not allowed to speak for the duration of the trials due to the effects of helium on the vocal chords. The hypothesised effect of heliox was not described to the subjects. We had subjects perform the air TTE first (visit 4) so we could identify the time of exercise termination and collect FVLs at ‘iso-time’ during the heliox TTE since we expected the PRET would exercise for longer with heliox. External resistance was matched between trials.8 TTEs were terminated when cycling cadence decreased by 10%–15%, and subjects failed to increase it with encouragement.

Data analysis 

All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism statistical software (V.7.0a), and alpha was set a priori to p=0.05. Tests described in table/figure legends.

Results

Descriptive information 

PRET were born at 27.9±1.9 weeks gestation and weighed 1.15±0.41 kg. In general, PRET had worse pulmonary function than CONT and had a significantly lower VO2peak and peak power output (table 1).

Table 1

Anthropometric, VO2peak, resting pulmonary function and diffusion capacity data

Time-to-exhaustion 

There was no difference in TTE between groups in either trial, however, they exercised at significantly different workloads so this was expected (figure 1). PRET had a significant (p<0.05) increase in TTE from air to heliox while CONT had no change (figure 1).

Figure 1

(A) Mean±SD time-to-exhaustion (TTE) in min in counterparts born at term (CONT) and preterm birth (PRET) groups during exercise breathing air (black) and heliox (grey). There was no difference in TTE between CONT and PRET while breathing either gas. PRET had a significant increase in TTE while breathing heliox compared with while breathing air (†). CONT had no change in TTE while breathing heliox compared with while breathing air. Numbers inside of the bars are the median dyspnoea rating acquired at iso-time. PRET had a significant reduction in dyspnoea with heliox computed with a Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test. (B) Individual data in CONT and PRET. Solid lines represent subjects that increased TTE and dashed lines represent subjects that had no change or a decrease in TTE. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) post hoc test was computed to identify group and gas differences on TTE. 

Expiratory flow limitation

PRET had a significantly greater %EFL than CONT in both trials (p<0.05) and had a significant reduction in %EFL in heliox (p<0.001; figure 2).

Figure 2

(A) Mean ±SD of the extent of expiratory flow limitation (EFL) as a % of tidal volume (VT) in counterparts born at term (CONT) and preterm birth (PRET) at iso-time of exercise while breathing air (black) and heliox (grey). PRET had significantly greater EFL during air and heliox trials compared with CONT (*). Breathing heliox during exercise significantly reduced the extent of EFL in PRET (†). We did not correct %EFL for the effect of thoracic gas compression and/or exercise-induced bronchodilation so the magnitude of EFL is an overestimation. However, and importantly, the repeated measures design means that this overestimation was systematic and equal across trials since the compressibility of nitrogen and helium are not different. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) post hoc test was computed to identify group and gas differences on %EFL. (B) Mean ±SD of inspiratory reserve volume (IRV) at iso-time in CONT and PRET while breathing air (black circle) and heliox (grey square). There was no difference between groups or trials as determined with a two-way ANOVA. TLC,  total lung capacity.

Discussion

Breathing heliox significantly reduced EFL and resulted in an increase in TTE and minute ventilation (VE) in PRET, but had no effect on TTE in CONT presumably because they had minimal EFL. These data suggest that mechanical constraints to ventilation are a contributing factor limiting aerobic exercise performance in PRET.

Mechanical ventilatory constraints include several inter-related aspects of the ventilatory response to exercise such as EFL, a significant reduction in inspiratory reserve volume (IRV), dyspnoea and/or dynamic hyperinflation. We found that TTE increased significantly when EFL was decreased. Heliox reduces airflow resistance,8 thereby increasing the maximal attainable expiratory airflow rate and expanding the maximum FVL, and consequently increasing maximal ventilatory capacity. Because CONT had minimal EFL while breathing air, there was minimal effect on TTE breathing heliox. These data support our hypothesis that EFL contributes to a lower aerobic exercise performance in PRET.

A reduction in IRV to <1.0 L has been shown to correspond to a mismatch in respiratory effort and tidal volume response resulting in intolerable dyspnoea and exercise termination in patients with COPD.11 12 Our previous4 and current work demonstrate PRET had a decline in IRV to <1.0 L at end exercise while breathing air and heliox. However, in the heliox trial, PRET were able to exercise for longer, perhaps because the respiratory effort was lessened with heliox, which is supported by a significant reduction in dyspnoea rating (median; 9 vs 6). In CONT, there was a similar reduction in IRV, but they did not exercise for longer nor did their dyspnoea rating at iso-time differ between trials (8 vs 8). These data suggest that a reduction in IRV may play a role in exercise termination via its effect on dyspnoea.

Limitations 

Subjects performed the air TTE first and the heliox TTE second. Thus, the increase in exercise endurance while breathing heliox could be due to a ‘practice effect’ rather than a physiologic effect. However, there was no difference in TTE between the practice and air trials so we believe our findings represent a positive physiologic effect from heliox. Additionally, subjects were blinded to the gas they breathed and were not told what the proposed effects of helium were.

In conclusion, our data support the hypothesis that exercise endurance in PRET is primarily limited by excessive mechanical ventilatory constraints, principally EFL. When these constraints are reduced, then dyspnoea decreases and endurance time increases.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the subjects for their participation. We also thank Tyler Mangum, Jon Elliott, Jim Davis, Dillan Firestone, Elizabeth Vulgamore, Annarose Schneider, and Kelsey Ball for assistance with data collection and analysis.

References

Footnotes

  • Contributors JWD, IMG, ATL: conception and design of experiments. JWD, ATL: financial support. JWD, AMZ, IMG, ATL: collection and assembly of data; data analysis and interpretation; manuscript writing and final approval of manuscript.

  • Funding This research was supported by an American Heart Association Scientist Development Grant #2280238 (ATL); American Physiological Society’s Giles F Filley Memorial Award for Excellence in Respiratory Physiology and Medicine (ATL); Medical Research Foundation of Oregon Early Clinical Investigator Award (JWD) and Ohio University Research Committee award (JWD).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Not required.

  • Ethics approval University of Oregon’s Office of Responsible Conduct of Research and Ohio University Office of Research Compliance.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Correction notice This article has been corrected since it was published Online First. The city for affiliation 4 was incorrect.