Article Text

other Versions

Download PDFPDF
Alleviating mechanical constraints to ventilation with heliox improves exercise endurance in adult survivors of very preterm birth
  1. Joseph W Duke1,
  2. Amy M Zidron2,
  3. Igor M Gladstone3,
  4. Andrew T Lovering4
  1. 1Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA
  2. 2Department of Pediatrics, Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens, Ohio, USA
  3. 3Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
  4. 4Department of Human Physiology, University of Oregon, Portland, Oregon, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Joseph W Duke, Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff AZ 86011, USA; JJ.Duke{at}nau.edu

Abstract

Adult survivors of very preterm birth (PRET) have significantly lower aerobic exercise capacities than their counterparts born at term (CONT), but the underlying cause is unknown. To test whether expiratory flow limitation (EFL) during exercise negatively affects exercise endurance in PRET, we had PRET and CONT exercise to exhaustion breathing air and again breathing heliox. In PRET, EFL decreased and time-to-exhaustion increased significantly while breathing heliox. Heliox had a minimal effect on EFL and had no effect on time-to-exhaustion in CONT. We conclude that aerobic exercise endurance in PRET is limited, in part, by mechanical ventilatory constraints, specifically EFL.

  • exercise
  • lung physiology
  • paediatric lung disaese

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors JWD, IMG, ATL: conception and design of experiments. JWD, ATL: financial support. JWD, AMZ, IMG, ATL: collection and assembly of data; data analysis and interpretation; manuscript writing and final approval of manuscript.

  • Funding This research was supported by an American Heart Association Scientist Development Grant #2280238 (ATL); American Physiological Society’s Giles F Filley Memorial Award for Excellence in Respiratory Physiology and Medicine (ATL); Medical Research Foundation of Oregon Early Clinical Investigator Award (JWD) and Ohio University Research Committee award (JWD).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Not required.

  • Ethics approval University of Oregon’s Office of Responsible Conduct of Research and Ohio University Office of Research Compliance.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.