Article Text

Original article
Using venous blood gas analysis in the assessment of COPD exacerbations: a prospective cohort study
  1. Tricia M McKeever1,
  2. Glenn Hearson2,
  3. Gemma Housley3,
  4. Catherine Reynolds2,
  5. William Kinnear4,
  6. Tim W Harrison2,
  7. Anne-Maree Kelly5,
  8. Dominick E Shaw2,3
  1. 1Division of Epidemiology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
  2. 2Respiratory Research Unit, Division of Respiratory Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
  3. 3Medical Informatics, East Midlands Academic Health Sciences Network, Nottingham, UK
  4. 4Respiratory Medicine, Nottingham University Hospital Trust, Nottingham, UK
  5. 5Emergency Medicine, Joseph Epstein Centre for Emergency Medicine Research, Western Health, St Albans, Victoria, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Dr Dominick E Shaw, Respiratory Research Unit, Division of Respiratory Medicine, University of Nottingham, Clinical Sciences Building, Nottingham City Hospital, Edwards Lane, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK; dominic.shaw{at}nottingham.ac.uk

Abstract

Introduction Identifying acute hypercapnic respiratory failure is crucial in the initial management of acute exacerbations of COPD. Guidelines recommend obtaining arterial blood samples but these are more difficult to obtain than venous. We assessed whether blood gas values derived from venous blood could replace arterial at initial assessment.

Methods Patients requiring hospital treatment for an exacerbation of COPD had paired arterial and venous samples taken. Bland–Altman analyses were performed to assess agreement between arterial and venous pH, CO2 and Embedded Image. The relationship between SpO2 and SaO2 was assessed. The number of attempts and pain scores for each sample were measured.

Results 234 patients were studied. There was good agreement between arterial and venous measures of pH and Embedded Image (mean difference 0.03 and −0.04, limits of agreement −0.05 to 0.11 and −2.90 to 2.82, respectively), and between SaO2 and SpO2 (in patients with an SpO2 of >80%). Arterial sampling required more attempts and was more painful than venous (mean pain score 4 (IQR 2–5) and 1 (IQR 0–2), respectively, p<0.001).

Conclusions Arterial sampling is more difficult and more painful than venous sampling. There is good agreement between pH and Embedded Image values derived from venous and arterial blood, and between pulse oximetry and arterial blood gas oxygen saturations. These agreements could allow the initial assessment of COPD exacerbations to be based on venous blood gas analysis and pulse oximetry, simplifying the care pathway and improving the patient experience.

  • COPD Exacerbations

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

Linked Articles