Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Correspondence
Author’s response to ‘CAP and HCAP are different? An unresolved question’
Free
  1. Eva Polverino,
  2. Antoni Torres,
  3. on behalf of the HCAP study group
  1. Respiratory Disease Department, Hospital Clínic i Provincial de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (Ciberes), Barcelona, Spain
  1. Correspondence to Respiratory Disease Department, Hospital Clínic i Provincial de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBER de Enfermedades, Respiratorias (Ciberes), Villarroel 170, Barcelona 08036, Spain; atorres{at}clinic.ub.es

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Dear Editor,

We thank the authors for the interest in our recent publication and for their useful comments.

Unfortunately we consider the comparison with the publication from Giannella et al 1 poorly appropriate in many aspects. The main strength of our work is the multicentre prospective case–control study design (match by age, gender and period of hospitalisation). Although severity scores were not used for matching, we considered this design the most appropriate to describe healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP) features. In fact, the Giannella group performed an observational prospective study only on patients admitted to internal medicine departments: these elements (study design and patients) could justify a different population composition and, consequently, …

View Full Text

Linked Articles