Background Previous studies have reported adverse effects of either regional or near-roadway air pollution (NRAP) on lung function. However, there has been little study of the joint effects of these exposures.
Objectives To assess the joint effects of NRAP and regional pollutants on childhood lung function in the Children's Health Study.
Methods Lung function was measured on 1811 children from eight Southern Californian communities. NRAP exposure was assessed based on (1) residential distance to the nearest freeway or major road and (2) estimated near-roadway contributions to residential nitrogen dioxide (NO2), nitric oxide (NO) and total nitrogen oxides (NOx). Exposure to regional ozone (O3), NO2, particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter <10 µm (PM10) and 2.5 µm (PM2.5) was measured continuously at community monitors.
Results An increase in near-roadway NOx of 17.9 ppb (2 SD) was associated with deficits of 1.6% in forced vital capacity (FVC) (p=0.005) and 1.1% in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) (p=0.048). Effects were observed in all communities and were similar for NO2 and NO. Residential proximity to a freeway was associated with a reduction in FVC. Lung function deficits of 2–3% were associated with regional PM10 and PM2.5 (FVC and FEV1) and with O3 (FEV1), but not NO2 across the range of exposure between communities. Associations with regional pollution and NRAP were independent in models adjusted for each. The effects of NRAP were not modified by regional pollutant concentrations.
Conclusions The results indicate that NRAP and regional air pollution have independent adverse effects on childhood lung function.
- Respiratory Measurement
Statistics from Altmetric.com
What is the key question?
Do residential near-roadway and regional air pollution cause reduced lung function?
What is the bottom line?
This study found that increased near-roadway and regional air pollutants were independently associated with lower FEV1 and FVC.
Why read on?
A design including multiple communities and predicted near-roadway residential air pollution exposure from well-validated models allowed this study to demonstrate associations of lung function deficits with regional ozone and particulate matter that were independent of associations with indicators of the near-roadway pollutant mixture in multiple communities.
Reduced lung function has been associated with subsequent increased risk of overall mortality including coronary artery disease and respiratory disease in adults1 and with asthma in children.2 Identifying factors that reduce lung function but are modifiable could therefore lead to interventions with large public benefits.
Regional air pollutants have been associated with reduced lung function in both adults and children.3 ,4 Studies examining lung function in children exposed to local residential near-roadway air pollution (NRAP) have not found consistent associations,5–11 although exposure metrics differed across studies. However, there has been little investigation of the joint effects of regional and NRAP exposures.
In this study we assessed the joint effects of NRAP and regional exposures to ozone (O3), particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter of <10 µm and 2.5 µm (PM10 and PM2.5) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) on childhood lung function in the Children's Health Study (CHS). We examined associations with both traffic proximity measures and land use regression modelled NRAP based on a prior dense air monitoring study of nitrogen oxides (NOx) conducted within CHS communities.
The CHS has enrolled over 11 000 children in a series of cohorts investigating the health effects of air pollution. The current analysis includes a cohort established in 2002–2003 when participants were 5–7 years of age.12 During the 2007–2008 school year, lung function was measured on 1811 cohort participants (82% of the active cohort) from eight communities, as described in detail in the online supplement.
Questionnaires completed by parents or guardians at study enrolment provided information on participants’ health, sociodemographic and other exposures, which was updated yearly. A complete list of covariates is described in the online supplement.
Trained technicians measured lung function, weight and height, and collected information about recent acute respiratory illness. Using pressure transducer-based spirometers (Screenstar Spirometers, Morgan Scientific, Haverhill, Massachusetts, USA), we identified the maximal forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) from a series of seven efforts from each child, as described previously.13
Air pollution exposure
NRAP exposures at each child's residence and school were based on estimates of surrogates, including distance to freeways, highways and large surface streets. Spatial land use regression models were developed based on an extensive monitoring campaign of NOx and NO2 and by subtraction nitrogen oxide (NO) at over 900 locations in CHS communities, as described previously.14 Key predictors included distance to freeways and major roads, traffic volumes and their emissions-weighted dispersion estimates, with lesser contributions from population density and local variation in elevation. The resulting annual average predicted residential concentrations of near-roadway NO, NO2 and NOx incrementally increased above the regional background was used in the analyses, as described below.
The regional level of NO2, PM2.5, PM10 and O3 was computed as the mean of the 6 years of each pollutant measured continuously at a central monitoring location in each community from cohort recruitment (2002) to the recording of lung function tests (2007).
Additional details of NRAP and regional pollutant exposure assessment are provided in the online supplement.
We fitted linear regression models (with fixed effects for each study community) to investigate associations of FVC and FEV1 with NRAP and a mixed model that included a random intercept for community to assess associations with regional pollutants and joint effects with NRAP. Each pulmonary function outcome was log transformed to satisfy the assumptions of the models. All models were adjusted for demographic and anthropomorphic characteristics (eg, height) and selected other potential confounders (eg, spirometry technician). In sensitivity analyses, other potential confounders and effect modifiers were examined using standard methods described in further detail in the online supplement.
The NRAP NOx (and NO and NO2) predicted residential exposures were deviated from a community-specific mean. Conceptually, this allowed examination of the effect of the complex NRAP mixture, for which the nitrogen oxides are only a surrogate, and to distinguish it from the regional NO2 effect which was assessed based on the continuous measurements at the community monitor in order to be comparable with other regional pollutant assessments. This procedure was also necessary to make the NRAP NOx approximately orthogonal (uncorrelated) to cross-community regional exposures in the mixed models. Health effect estimates were scaled to the range of long-term average regional pollution across all communities and to 2 SDs in the predicted NRAP NOx.
Based on our final model, we also computed estimated lung function representative of different combinations of high and low regional and NRAP environments. Low regional pollution was based on the minimum value of regional PM2.5 while low NRAP was defined as 1 SD below the mean value for deviated NOx. Conversely, high regional pollution was based on the maximum value of regional PM2.5 and high NRAP was defined as 1 SD above the mean value for deviated NOx. We expressed the predicted lung function in these different environments as percentages relative to those in the cleanest environment (low regional and low NRAP).
The mean (SD) age at lung function measurement was 11.2 (0.6) years; 40% of the participants were white and 57% were of Hispanic ethnicity (table 1). Household income less than $30 000 and parental education less than high school were common, and secondhand tobacco smoke exposure was uncommon.
Overall, 27% of children lived within 500 m of a freeway, while 20%, 15% and 38% lived 500–1000 m, 1000–1500 m or >1500 m from a freeway, respectively (see online supplementary table S1); 14% of children lived within 75 m of a major road (mostly non-freeway), while 17% lived 75–150 m, 28% lived 150–300 m and 40% lived at least 300 m from a major road. The distributions of residential proximity to freeways and major roads varied substantially from community to community. Predicted residential near-roadway NOx, NO and NO2 showed wide variation within most study communities (figure 1). Correlations among regional pollutant levels ranged from 0.06 (between PM10 and NO2) to 0.80 (between PM10 and PM2.5; see online supplementary table S2). O3 had relatively strong positive correlations with PM2.5 and PM10. The correlation between predicted near-roadway NO, NO2 and NOx (within communities) exceeded 0.90 (see online supplementary table S3).
The mean FEV1 and FVC for boys were 2474 mL and 2902 mL, respectively, and the corresponding means for girls were 2442 mL and 2783 mL. Living within 500 m of a freeway was associated with a nearly 2% deficit in FVC (−1.96%; 95% CI −3.41% to −0.49%; p=0.009) compared with those living at least 1500 m from a freeway (table 2). Mean FEV1 was also lower for children living within 500 m of a freeway, but the association was not statistically significant. Although close proximity to a major road was negatively associated with each measure of lung function, these associations were not statistically significant.
Near-roadway residential NOx, NO and NO2 had statistically significant negative associations with both FVC and FEV1 (table 2). For example, a 2 SD increase in near-roadway NOx exposure (17.9 ppb) was associated with a 1.56% deficit in FVC (95% CI −2.62 to −0.49; p=0.005) and a 1.10% deficit in FEV1 (95% CI −2.19 to −0.01; p=0.048). Negative associations between near-roadway NOx and lung function were observed in six of the eight study communities for FEV1 (figure 2A) and in all eight study communities for FVC (figure 2B). There was no significant heterogeneity of near-roadway NOx effects across the eight communities for either FEV1 (p=0.61) or FVC (p=0.64).
Adjustment for potential confounding variables resulted in only small changes to the estimated effects of near-roadway residential NOx on FEV1 and FVC (table 3). For example, across models that included various additional adjustments, the near-roadway NOx-related deficits ranged from −0.96% to −1.12% (main model −1.10%) for FEV1 and from −1.40% to −1.60% (main model −1.56%) for FVC. In an analysis restricted to children without asthma, the effect of near-roadway NOx was similar to that in the entire study population (1.19% decline in FEV1 and 1.51% decline in FVC). The difference in effects between children with and without asthma was not statistically significant. There was also no significant heterogeneity in near-roadway NOx effects on lung function in girls compared with boys. Although we have observed associations of lung function with exposure at schools of participants in this study in conjunction with psychosocial stress,15 we observed no main effects of exposure in schools in this analysis (results not shown).
Deficits in FEV1 of approximately 3% were observed across the range of community O3 and PM2.5 levels (p=0.006 for O3 and 0.001 for PM2.5; table 4 and figure 3). A deficit of >2% was observed across the range of PM10 exposure. Deficits in FVC of >2% were also observed across the range of both PM2.5 and PM10 (table 4 and figure 4); however, a single community (Mira Loma) appears to have driven the association between FVC and PM10.
In models assessing the joint effects of regional and NRAP, there was little change in the strength of the regional pollutant associations with either FVC or FEV1 after adjusting for near-roadway NOx (table 5). For FEV1, there was little change in the unadjusted association of near-roadway NOx (1.10% deficit in table 2) after adjusting for regional pollutant effects (1.04–1.14% deficits in table 5). For FVC, the unadjusted association with near-roadway NOx (1.56% deficit, table 2) was somewhat attenuated after adjusting for regional pollutants (1.40–1.49% deficits in table 5), although the associations remained significant. Similar patterns of lung function deficits in two-pollutant models were observed for near-roadway NO and NO2 (results not shown). The patterns of effects of freeway proximity associations were also similar in models including a regional pollutant and in models unadjusted for regional pollution (results not shown). We examined the possibility that background pollutant exposures might upregulate the pulmonary response to near-roadway pollutants resulting in larger lung function deficits in communities with high regional pollutants. However, none of the regional pollutants significantly modified the association between near-roadway residential NOx and each of the lung function endpoints (results not shown).
These results indicate that exposure to NRAP adversely affects childhood lung function. The strengths of the study were the ability to show consistent effects of NRAP using both roadway proximity and validated predicted NOx markers for the NRAP mixture in communities with differing regional air quality, roadway networks and geographical characteristics. The study design offered an unusual opportunity to demonstrate that associations of lung function with NRAP pollutant variation were independent of associations also observed with regional air pollution.
NRAP is a complex mixture of particles and reactive gases with oxidant and proinflammatory properties that could plausibly cause the observed lung function deficits.16 ,17 Oxides of nitrogen were selected to develop prediction models for likely near-roadway variation of the mixture because they are inexpensive to measure with the spatial density needed to develop valid models. NO2 also has known oxidant and immune-modulatory properties and could contribute to the near-roadway lung function effects,18 although in our analysis it was not possible to distinguish NRAP NO2 effects from other components of the mixture. The association of regional PM2.5 and PM10 with both FEV1 and FVC, and no effect of regional NO2, suggests that there were independent effects of transported or secondary regional particulate matter and of the NRAP mixture (rather than NO2). In addition, previous reports from the CHS (and other studies) showing associations of NRAP (but not regional pollutants) with prevalent and incident asthma12 ,19 ,20 are also consistent with separate and independent effects of these diverse pollutant mixtures.
It is also possible that more complex combinations of regional and NRAP account for the observed associations, as toxicological and experimental studies indicate that interaction with other pollutants may enhance the effects of particle exposure.21 ,22 Although the study design allowed us to examine the heterogeneity of NRAP health effects across multiple communities, we found little evidence for interaction between regional pollutants and NRAP. Rather, the adverse effects were relatively consistent in all eight study communities, although there was limited precision to each estimate because of limited community-specific sample size.
We have previously observed associations of regional PM23 and traffic proximity7 with growth of FVC, but accompanied by larger effects in FEV1 in an older cohort of CHS participants. Other studies of traffic and lung function in elementary school and adolescent children have also found larger associations with flow rates than with FVC.8 ,9 ,24 However, the current results are consistent with an observed effect of regional pollutants on FVC in a cross-sectional analysis of prior CHS cohorts.13 Additional follow-up of this cohort is ongoing and may help elucidate these relationships.
Some previous studies that have looked at associations between residential traffic-related pollution and lung function were performed in multiple geographical regions,5 ,7 ,8 ,10 ,11 but many of these studies used only roadway proximity or traffic count/density metrics rather than validated exposure models. Other studies that have used land use regression to estimate the relationship between NRAP and childhood lung function were performed in relatively limited geographical regions.6 ,9 The results have not been consistent across studies.
These inconsistencies in the strength of association between near-roadway residential traffic exposure and respiratory health across several prior studies5–11 may result in part from the use of different types of NRAP measures, with differing degrees of uncertainty as proxies for pollution exposure. A strength of this study was the use of quantitative residential NOx exposure assignments derived from a spatial land use regression model calibrated to measurements at well-characterised locations in study communities.14 Additionally, the association between lung function and predicted NOx was consistent with the inverse relationship between residential distance to a freeway and lung function, which was also observed in an earlier CHS cohort,7 as concentrations of NRAP decrease with increasing distance from a freeway.25 Comparable high-quality exposure assessment across studies would facilitate qualitative comparisons or pooled analyses and might lead to more consistent epidemiological findings.
The adverse associations of lung function with O3, PM2.5 and PM10 are consistent with other studies.3 In earlier CHS cohorts we reported associations of lung function with PM2.5 and PM10, as well as NO2, but not with O3.7 ,13 However, O3 and PM were correlated across communities of the current cohort, and it was therefore not possible to distinguish the effects of each.
This study replicates the general design and general age range of a cross-sectional report from a previous CHS cohort,19 but expands the scope of that earlier work by examining both between-community and within-community pollutant effects. The amount of between-community regional variation in the present study is less than that found in previous CHS studies due to our focus on more urban communities with larger gradients in NRAP. However, there is a nearly twofold difference in the 6-year averaged regional pollution concentrations (figures 3 and 4) between the highest and lowest polluted communities, which allowed us to identify between-community and within-community effects. We have been collecting additional lung function data and will examine longitudinal pollutant effects separately.
We considered the possibility that bias explained our results. Participants and non-participants from the cohort were generally similar across a broad range of demographic, social and housing characteristics (see online supplementary table S4). The only significant difference was for boys, who were more likely than girls to be non-participants. However, adjusting for sex and for other characteristics had little impact on the NRAP effect estimate (table 3). Furthermore, the effect of NOx on lung function in analyses restricted to girls was generally similar to the effect among all participants. Although selection bias and residual confounding by other factors cannot be excluded as an explanation for our results, these analyses provide little reason to believe that this occurred.
There are potentially large public health implications of these findings because NRAP exposure due to proximity of homes and other locations where children spend time is common26 ,27 and lung function in childhood tracks into adult life.28–30 Furthermore, the strong association between exposure and lung function in non-asthmatic children suggests that traffic-related pollution did not affect only a sensitive subgroup but rather has a potential impact on all children. Although direct comparison of the magnitude of effects of regional and near-roadway pollution is difficult, the deficits associated with near-roadway NOx across a 2 SD range of within-community variation encompassing most children in our study communities was only modestly less than the effects of regional pollutants across the range of community average exposure. Compared with a child living in a low NRAP environment in a low regional PM2.5 community, the results suggest that a child living in a high NRAP environment in a community with high PM in Southern California would experience a decrease in FEV1 of >4% (figure 5). For comparison with another common exposure, maternal secondhand smoking of 1 pack/day has been shown to be associated with a 0.4% deficit in the childhood level of FEV1.31 Prevention of these large pollutant effects poses a challenge to the current air pollution regulatory framework, which historically has set standards using risk calculations that consider effects of regional air quality but not near-roadway traffic-related variation in exposure.
Review history and Supplementary material
This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.
Files in this Data Supplement:
- Data supplement 1 - Online supplement
Contributors RU conducted the statistical analysis and wrote the primary draft of the manuscript. RM, TI, ELA, FWL, HV, WSL, EBR, FDG and WJG assisted in interpreting the results and contributed to revising the manuscript. RM, ELA, HV and WJG conceived and designed the study and EBR maintained the database.
Funding This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant nos 5P30ES007048, 5P01ES009581, 5P01ES011627, P01ES022845, 5R01 ES016535, 5R03ES014046, 1P50 CA180905, 5R01HL061768, 5R01HL076647, 5R01HL087680 and 1RC2HL101651), the Environmental Protection Agency (grant nos RD83544101, R826708, RD831861 and R831845) and the Hastings Foundation.
Competing interests FWL is employed by Sonoma Technology Inc (Petaluma, California, USA). RM has received research support from an air quality violations settlement agreement between the South Coast Air Quality Management District, a California state regulatory agency, and BP. The other authors declare they have no actual or potential competing interests.
Ethics approval Ethics approval was obtained from USC Institutional Review Board.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.