Article Text

other Versions

Download PDFPDF

Occupational exposures and the risk of COPD: dusty trades revisited
Free
  1. Paul D. Blanc (paul.blanc{at}ucsf.edu)
  1. University of California, San Francisco, United States
    1. Carlos Iribarren (carlos.iribarren{at}nsmtp.kp.org)
    1. Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, United States
      1. Laura Trupin (laura.trupin{at}ucsf.edu)
      1. University of California, San Francisco, United States
        1. Gillian Earnest (gillian.earnest{at}ucsf.edu)
        1. University of California, San Francisco, United States
          1. Patricia P Katz (patti.katz{at}ucsf.edu)
          1. University of California, San Francisco, United States
            1. John Balmes (john.balmes{at}ucsf.edu)
            1. University of California, San Francisco, United States
              1. Stephen Sidney (steve.sidney{at}kp.org)
              1. Kaiser Permanente Division of Rearch, United States
                1. Mark D Eisner (mark.eisner{at}ucsf.edu)
                1. Kaiser University of California, San Francisco, Permanente Division of Research, United States

                  Abstract

                  Background: The contribution of occupational exposures to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and, in particular, their potential interaction with cigarette smoking remains underappreciated.

                  Methods: We used data from the FLOW study of 1,202 subjects with COPD (of which 742 had disease classified as Stage II or above by Global Obstructive Lung Disease [GOLD] criteria) and 302 referent subjects matched by age, sex, and race, recruited from a large managed care organization. Occupational exposures were assessed using two methods: self-reported exposure to vapors, gas, dust, or fumes on the longest held job (VGDF) and a job exposure matrix (JEM) for probability of exposure based on occupation. Multivariate analysis was used to control for age, sex, race, and smoking history. The odds ratio (OR) and the adjusted population attributable fraction (PAF) associated with occupational exposure were calculated.

                  Results: VGDF exposure was associated with an increased risk of COPD (OR 2.11; 95% CI 1.59-2.82) and a PAF of 31% (95% CI 22-39%). The risk associated with high probability of workplace exposure by JEM was similar (OR 2.27; 95% CI 1.46-3.52), although the PAF was lower (13%; 95% CI 8 to 18%). These estimates were not substantively different when the analysis was limited to COPD GOLD Stage II or above. Joint exposure to both smoking and occupational factors markedly increased the risk of COPD (OR 14.1; 95% CI 9.33-21.2).

                  Conclusions: Workplace exposures are strongly associated with an increased risk of COPD. On a population level, prevention of both smoking and occupational exposures, and especially both together, is needed to prevent the global burden of disease.

                  Statistics from Altmetric.com

                  Request Permissions

                  If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

                  Linked Articles