Article info
PDFChronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Original research
Automatic oxygen titration versus constant oxygen flow rates during walking in COPD: a randomised controlled, double-blind, crossover trial
- Correspondence to Tessa Schneeberger, Department of Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Hessen, Germany; TSchneeberger{at}schoen-klinik.de
Citation
Automatic oxygen titration versus constant oxygen flow rates during walking in COPD: a randomised controlled, double-blind, crossover trial
Publication history
- Received November 2, 2020
- Accepted September 5, 2021
- First published October 16, 2021.
Online issue publication
May 16, 2023
Article Versions
- Previous version (15 March 2023).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Supplementary Data
This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.