Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Beware, vaping e-cigarettes around children is adversely impacting their lung health
  1. Ana Lucia Fuentes1,2,
  2. Laura E Crotty Alexander1,2
  1. 1 Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
  2. 2 Medicine, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Laura E Crotty Alexander, Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA; lca{at}ucsd.edu

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are hand-held devices that heat and aerosolise liquids that commonly consist of propylene glycol, glycerol, chemical flavourants and nicotine (or tetrahydrocannabinol).1 These devices were initially marketed as a lower risk nicotine replacement, but increasing evidence points to the contrary. Even more concerning is that marketing has targeted the vulnerable adolescent population, with 78% of middle school and high school students exposed to at least one e-cigarette advertisement between 2014 and 2016.2 Of interest is how these marketing strategies likely contributed to the misinformation surrounding e-cigarettes. Pepper et al explored adolescents’ understanding of e-cigarettes and found concerning misperceptions about nicotine and e-liquids among participants.3 They found that 62% of non-nicotine vapers and 49% of nicotine vapers thought nicotine in e-liquids was made artificially rather than from tobacco. This could indicate that there is a misperception that some forms of nicotine are safer than others. Additionally, they found that adolescents who believed they were using e-cigarettes without nicotine had poorer overall …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Twitter @crottyalexander

  • Contributors ALF and LECA co-wrote, edited and approved the manuscript.

  • Funding LECA’s salary was supported in part by a VA Merit Award (1I01BX004767; PI LCA), NIH NHLBI R01 (HL147326; PI LCA) and TRDRP High Impact Pilot Award grant number (T30IP0965; PI LCA).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles