Introduction There is growing interest in the impact of greenness exposure on airway diseases, but the impact of greenness on lung function in children is limited. We aimed to investigate the associations between greenness surrounding schools and lung function in children and whether these associations are modified by air pollution exposure.
Methods Between 2012 and 2013, a cross-sectional survey and spirometry were performed among 6740 school children. Lung function patterns were determined as obstructive forced expiratory volume 1 s/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC <0.8) or restrictive (FEV1/FVC ≥0.8 but FVC <80% of predicted). School greenness was defined by Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and soil-adjusted vegetation index. Nitrogen dioxide, sulphur dioxide and particular matter concentrations were assessed using a spatiotemporal model and national monitoring data. Two-level generalised linear models were used to investigate associations and interactions.
Results Overall, an IQR in NDVI within 500 m was associated with higher FEV1 (+57 mL 95% CI 44 to 70) and FVC (+58 mL 95% CI 43 to 73). NDVI was similarly associated with 25% reduced odds of spirometric restriction (OR: 0.75, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.86). However, among children exposed to the highest compared with the lowest quartile of particulate matter, increasing NDVI was paradoxically associated with lower −40 mL FVC (95% CI −47 to –33, p interaction <0.05).
Discussion Our findings suggest that, in this study population, greening urban areas may promote lung health in low–moderate pollution areas but not in high air pollution areas. If the findings are replicated in other moderate-to-high pollution settings, this highlights a need to have a flexible green policy.
- respiratory measurement
- paediatric lung disaese
Data availability statement
Data are available upon reasonable request. See author contributions for specific data sets.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Contributors Study concept and design: G-HD, SD. Acquisition of data: G-HD, YZ, IM, JH. Analysis and interpretation of data: YZ, DB, JLP, AL, SD, G-HD. Drafting of the manuscript: YZ, DB, JLP, AL, KJL, SD, G-HD. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: all authors. Statistical analysis: YZ, DB, JLP, AL, SD, G-HD. Obtained funding: G-HD.
Funding The research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.91543208; No.81703179; No.81673128; No.82003409); the National Key Research and Development Programme of China (No.2016YFC0207000); the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No.16ykzd02; No.17ykpy16); the Guangdong Province Natural Science Foundation (No.2016A030313342; 2017A050501062); and Science and Technology Programme of Guangzhou (201807010032; 201803010054).
Map disclaimer The depiction of boundaries on this map does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of BMJ (or any member of its group) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, jurisdiction or area or of its authorities. This map is provided without any warranty of any kind, either express or implied.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.