Background Few studies have examined the effects of ambient particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to 2.5 μm (PM2.5) on hospital cost and length of hospital stay for respiratory diseases in China.
Methods We estimated ambient air pollution exposure for respiratory cases through inverse distance-weighted averages of air monitoring stations based on their residential address and averaged at the city level. We used generalised additive models to quantify city-specific associations in 11 cities in Shanxi and a meta-analysis to estimate the overall effects. We further estimated respiratory burden attributable to PM2.5 using the standards of WHO (25 µg/m3) and China (75 µg/m3) as reference.
Results Each 10 µg/m3 increase in lag03 PM2.5 corresponded to 0.53% (95% CI: 0.33% to 0.73%) increase in respiratory hospitalisation, an increment of 3.75 thousand RMB (95% CI: 1.84 to 5.670) in hospital cost and 4.13 days (95% CI: 2.51 to 5.75) in length of hospital stay. About 9.7 thousand respiratory hospitalisations, 132 million RMB in hospital cost and 145 thousand days of hospital stay could be attributable to PM2.5 exposures using WHO’s guideline as reference. We estimated that 193 RMB (95% CI: 95 to 292) in hospital cost and 0.21 days (95% CI: 0.13 to 0.30) in hospital stay could be potentially avoidable for an average respiratory case.
Conclusion Significant respiratory burden could be attributable to PM2.5 exposures in Shanxi Province, China. The results need to be factored into impact assessment of air pollution policies to provide a more complete indication of the burden addressed by the policies.
- clinical epidemiology
- respiratory measurement
Data availability statement
Data are available upon reasonable request.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
DC and DL contributed equally.
Contributors DC and DL are joint first authors, contributed to the data collection, data cleaning and had primary responsibility for writing the manuscript. DC and DL contributed equally to this work. YW, ZQ, YL, QL and JS were involved in the writing and revision of the manuscript. YG, SZ, GJ, SM, CW and XY contributed to the revision of the manuscript and interpretation of the findings. XZ and HL contributed to the analysis and directed this study. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content. The corresponding authors attests that all listed authors meet authorship criteria and that no others meeting the criteria have been omitted.
Funding This study was funded by The Special Fund Project for Guiding Local Science and Technology Development by the Central Government (No.: YDZX20191400002737), the Natural Science Foundation of China (No.: 82041021) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (No.: INV-006371).
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.