Responses

Download PDFPDF
Original research
Effect of vitamin D supplementation on asthma control in patients with vitamin D deficiency: the ACVID randomised clinical trial
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Improving the quality of life in asthmatic patients supplemented with vitamin D: variability in the studies and discrepancy in the results.
    • Rubén Andújar-Espinosa, Pulmonology / Associate Professor in Health Sciences Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca. Murcia. Spain / University of Murcia
    • Other Contributors:
      • Lourdes Salinero-González, Endocrinology and Nutrition

    Vitamin D could have potentiating effects on the innate and adaptive immune system (1). This would explain a potential defense effect against respiratory infections. Based on this, this vitamin has been linked to respiratory diseases such as COPD, asthma, respiratory infections and even lung cancer (2). In November 2020, our work team published the ACVID randomized clinical trial, and we have received a letter from Dr. Nobuyuki Horita asking us two questions about our results. In the first place, he lists a series of studies that show a great discrepancy in the results on quality of life, requesting our opinion on this discrepancy. Second, he asks for our opinion on the results of our work in terms of improving quality of life without an increase in lung function.
    The authors continue to maintain that “some beneficial association was observed in the group of patients receiving vitamin D compared to the placebo group” in the studies analyzed in our article. In fact, in the VIDA research (3) the authors describe a small but significant association with the decrease in the dose of ciclesonide required to maintain asthma control in the vitamin D group. It is true that in this study the quality improvement Life is better in the control group, but this is a secondary objective. In the ViDiAs study (4) the authors found no significant differences in the reduction of asthma attacks or upper airway infections (coprimary outcomes), but, although they did not find clinical impr...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Does vitamin D supplementation in patients with vitamin D deficiency improve quality of life?
    • Nobuyuki Horita, Pulmonologist Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine
    • Other Contributors:
      • Takeshi Kaneko, Pulmonogist

    Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are two major obstructive lung diseases. Many epidemiological and genetic research including ours suggested possible association between vitamin D (VitD) and these diseases.[1 2] A meta-analysis by Jolliffe in 2019 demonstrated that VitD supplementation surely reduced the frequency of exacerbations in COPD patients who had VitD deficiency.[3] Vitamin D is an attractive option especially in developing countries because some of currently used medications such as bronchodilators and biologics are pricy. Given such background, VitD supplementation has been expected to be a new strategy for asthmatic patients with VitD deficiency. Thus, we read a report by Dr. Andújar-Espinosa et al. with a great interest.[4] The ACVID trial, a well-designed triple-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT), indicated greater improvement of quality of life (QOL) measured by Asthma Control Test (ACT) score as the primary endpoint, in the calcifediol arm compared to the placebo arm. Nonetheless, we have two concerns for this trial.
    First, there was a considerable discrepancy about the efficacy with previous reports. Inconsistency is a reason to degrade the quality of evidence.[5] Authors mentioned that "some beneficial association was observed in the group of patients receiving VitD compared with the placebo group" in all previous studies.[4] However, very limited data support the QOL improvement observed in ACVID trial. Dr. And...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.