Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Admission to hospital in the UK at a weekend does not influence the prognosis of adults with community-acquired pneumonia
Free
  1. Hannah Lawrence1,2,
  2. Tricia M McKeever2,
  3. Wei Shen Lim1
  4. on behalf of British Thoracic Society
  1. 1 Respiratory Medicine, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, UK
  2. 2 Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Hannah Lawrence, Respiratory Medicine, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK; hannah.lawrence1{at}nottingham.ac.uk

Abstract

Outcomes for adults with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) admitted to hospital at the weekend were compared with those admitted during weekdays using data from the British Thoracic Society national CAP audits. Of 31 400 cases, 40.7% were weekend admissions; these patients were older (mean age 72 vs 71.3 years, p=0.001) and more likely to have high severity CAP (28.9% vs 27.1%, p trend 0.003) but had slightly lower adjusted 30-day inpatient mortality (aOR 0.94 95% CI 0.88 to 1.01) compared with those admitted during weekdays. More patients in the weekend group received antibiotics within 4 hours of admission (70.3% vs 68.7%, aOR 1.07 95% CI 1.01 to 1.12). We did not observe increased mortality for adults admitted at the weekend with CAP.

  • pneumonia

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Introduction

The ‘weekend effect’, an increased risk of mortality for patients admitted on a Saturday or Sunday compared with a weekday, has garnered attention since 2001. Studies have provided evidence for it in differing healthcare systems, although causes remain unclear and evidence for a correlation between intensity of specialist hospital staffing and weekend mortality is lacking.1 2

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains a common reason for emergency medical admission in the UK and carries a high mortality of 10%–15%.3 Unlike some acute emergency conditions that require rapid access to specialist services, the optimal management of CAP, as described in guideline recommendations, can be delivered by acute medical staff of varying grades.3 4 As such, clinical outcomes are not expected to be influenced by weekend admission. Our aim was to assess whether outcomes and processes of care for CAP differ between adults admitted at the weekend compared with the weekday.

Methods

Aggregate data from six British Thoracic Society national adult CAP audits (winters 2009/10, 10/11, 11/12, 12/13, 14/15, 18/19) including cases as defined in previous work were used.5 Cases were identified by participating institutions via ICD10 codes mapping to a primary discharge diagnosis of pneumonia (J12.0–J18.0) and selected for eligibility against inclusion criteria to confirm a clinical and radiographic diagnosis of CAP. The primary outcome of interest was 30-day inpatient mortality. Secondary outcomes included 7-day and 3-day inpatient mortality, time to discharge in days, critical care admission and readmission within 30 days of discharge. Process of care measures analysed were CXR and receipt of antibiotics within 4 hours of admission, use of guideline concordant antibiotics and time to senior review.

The cohort was divided into two groups based on time and date of first presentation to hospital. Definitions for out-of-hours are taken from the NHS services website:6 weekday was defined as 08:00 Monday to 18:29 Friday; weekend was defined as 18:30 Friday to 07:59 Monday. Patients admitted on a holiday (defined as 18:30 on the day prior to 07:59 on the next working day) were included in the weekend group.

Descriptive statistics were used for group comparison and adjusted ORs calculated using a mixed-effects multivariate logistic regression models for each outcome variable. Following review of published literature, minimum sufficient adjustment variable sets were defined using directed acyclic graphs.7 The adjustment set for mortality included age, binary constituent parts of the CURB65 score, presence or absence of comorbidities and admitting hospital as a random effect. Analysis of time to discharge was performed using a competing risks analysis to obtain a HR for discharge within 30 days. Inpatient death was treated as a competing event. Patients who remained an inpatient at 30 days were censored from the analysis at this time point.

Cases were excluded from the analysis if the time of admission, primary outcome or variables within the minimal adjustment set were missing (<7% of data from each variable). All statistical analyses were performed using STATA 15.

Results

Of 34 194 cases, those missing key data (admission time (n=1008), status on discharge (n=193) and age (n=683)) were excluded leaving 32 984 for descriptive analysis. Patients who presented at the weekend (40.7%) were older (72 vs 71.3 years; OR 1.002), more likely to reside in a care home (14.8% vs 12.8%; OR 1.13), be admitted via the emergency department (84.8% vs 73.2%; OR 2.04) and have high severity pneumonia than those admitted during weekdays (table 1).

Table 1

Population characteristics by cohort group—weekday vs weekend admissions

Of 31 400 cases with available data for multivariate analysis of the primary outcome, adjusted mortality in the weekend group was slightly lower at 30 days (15.4% vs 15.5%; aOR 0.94, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.01) and 7 days (10.3% vs 10.4%; aOR 0.95, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.03) but equal at 3 days (6.2% vs 6.2%; aOR 0.96, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.06). No differences were found in rates of critical care admission (6% vs 5.8%; aOR 1.05, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.16) or readmission within 30 days of discharge (12.9% vs 113.1%; aOR 0.99, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.07). Results for each outcome were similar when analysed by severity category (results available on request). Patients admitted at the weekend had a 2% higher probability of discharge at any point from admission to 30 days than the weekday group (adjusted Hazards Ratio 1.02 95% CI 1.00 to 1.05, p=0.05).

Patients admitted at weekends were more likely to receive antibiotics within 4 hours (70.3% vs 68.7%; aOR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.12), but less likely to be reviewed by a senior clinician within 12 hours of admission (71.7% vs 74.7%; aOR 0.85, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.89). There were no differences in performance of CXR within 4 hours (85.9% vs 86%; aOR 1.01, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.08) or use of guideline concordant antibiotics (57.6% vs 57%; aOR 0.99, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.04) (table 2).

Table 2

Outcomes and process of care measures in the weekend and weekday groups

Discussion

Our main finding is that 30-day inpatient mortality, adjusted for disease severity and comorbidities, was slightly lower for adults admitted to hospital with CAP at weekends compared with weekdays. This is in contrast to published evidence on the ‘weekend effect’, much of which is not disease-specific. Evidence related to pneumonia is mixed. In Japan, Uematsu et al found a 10% higher adjusted total inpatient mortality for weekend admissions with severe pneumonia.8 In Australia, Baldwin et al found no association between day of week admitted and mortality.9 In England, analysis of administrative inpatient data linked to mortality data from 2004 to 2012 found marginally increased mortality for patients with pneumonia presenting at the weekend (aOR 1.037, 95% CI 1.035 to 1.049).10 Unlike administrative datasets, our study cohort comprised cases with radiologically confirmed CAP together with data on co-morbidity and severity of CAP on admission, thus reducing misclassification bias (from inclusion of patients without CAP) and allowing for appropriate case-mix adjustment. These features may explain the difference of our findings to previous studies. The slightly lower adjusted mortality in the weekend group may reflect more rapid access to time-critical aspects of care, as evidenced by increased access to antibiotics within 4 hours of admission.

A limitation of this study is a lack of microbiological data. A higher proportion of antibiotic-resistant, or more virulent, pathogens within the sicker weekend group, compared with the weekday group, cannot be excluded. If present, the direction of bias would be towards a higher weekend mortality and would mean the study findings are conservative. In this analysis, we did not adjust for vaccination status due to the unavailability of robust vaccination data. In the UK, priority groups for influenza and pneumococcal vaccination are identified according to older age and presence of comorbid illnesses. Overall, there were no major baseline differences between the two groups that would suggest a large difference in relation to eligibility for vaccination although we cannot exclude the possibility that vaccine uptake may have been higher in one of the groups.

We found no evidence of increased mortality for adults admitted at the weekend with CAP despite these patients being older and having higher severity pneumonia than patients admitted at weekdays. These results are reassuring and do not support a need for special ‘weekend measures’ in the management of CAP.

Acknowledgments

The support of the British Thoracic Society and all involved in the BTS audit programme for community acquired pneumonia is acknowledged.

References

Footnotes

  • Collaborators To ensure members/collaborators of "British Thoracic Society" are citable in PubMed please ensure individuals are listed in the 'Collaborators' section.

  • Contributors HL, WSL and TM provided the analysis for the draft paper. All authors were involved in drafting and approving the final paper for publication.

  • Funding This work is supported by NIHR Nottingham BRC.

  • Competing interests WSL’s institution has received unrestricted investigator-initiated research funding from Pfizer for an unrelated multicentre study for which WSL is chief investigator.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.