Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Gender in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis diagnosis: time to address unconscious bias
  1. Mary E Strek
  1. Department of Medicine, Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Mary E Strek, Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA; mstrek{at}medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Physicians have long incorporated gender into their diagnostic algorithms of pulmonary disease in an effort to use available clinical clues when a single confirmatory diagnostic test does not exist. Gender is thought to be a relevant patient characteristic in phenotyping lung disease with a female predominance noted in patients with adult-onset asthma and male predominance in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).1 2 Gender also may be of prognostic value in individual patients; severity of asthma is associated with female sex and increased mortality in interstitial lung disease (ILD) with male gender.2 3 While gender may increase diagnostic confidence, if the strength of the gender and disease association is not based on rigorously validated data, inaccurate diagnosis or underdiagnosis may result. In an earlier era, the failure to diagnose COPD in women was associated with gender bias when formally studied.4 More recently, the stereotype of the male smoker with lung cancer has been upended by the surprising data demonstrating higher lung cancer incidence rates in young women as compared with young men, not explained by differences in cigarette smoking.5

In this issue, Dr Assayag and colleagues investigate the role of gender in making a confident diagnosis of IPF, and conclude there is evidence for bias when …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors I contributed solely to this work.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles