Responses

Download PDFPDF
Original research
Paediatric reproducibility limits for the forced expiratory volume in 1 s
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Accounting for regression to the mean

    We would like to thank Dr. Rosenthal for his comment on our research. Dr. Rosenthal highlights that a change in FEV will inevitably be negatively correlated with the initial value; otherwise known as regression to the mean. One important distinction with our work is that we calculated the conditional change score based on z-scores and thus demonstrate the changes that are greater than that predicted by regression to the mean. By calculating the conditional change using z-scores we change the scale which is used and account for this fallacy. Reporting the differences using Bland-Alman is an alternative approach but will be limited to analysis of fixed time-intervals and if the variability is constant across age and time.

    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Paediatric reproducibility limits for the forced expiratory volume in 1 s
    • mark rosenthal, Consultant respiratory paediatrician Royal Bromton Hospital

    I was surprised to see figure 2 in the paper by Stanojevic et al (1) on assessing paediatric FEV1 reproducibility as, on the face of it, the authors may have fallen into a notorious statistical trap. A change in any variable (FEV1, blood pressure etc) is ALWAYS negatively correlated with the initial value because if x is initial value then y-x is the change, so inevitably related. If as an example one uses two separate sets of 100 normally distributed random numbers, each set with mean 100 and standard deviation 12 to mimic percent FEV1 and plot the first set as X against the difference between the two sets (Y-X) it will show an entirely spurious negative correlation (r = -0.7) with typically around 50% of the ‘variance’ explained. Altman(2) instead has recommended plotting a change against their average as an improved way of assessing the true relationship and using identical values, the spurious correlation disappears.

    1. Stanojevic S, Filipow N, Ratjen F. Paediatric reproducibility limits for the forced expiratory volume in 1 s. Thorax 2020;75:891-896.

    2. Altman DG. From: Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton, USA. 1999:282-285.

    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.