Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Original article
Occupational exposure to solvents and lung function decline: A population based study
  1. Sheikh M Alif1,2,
  2. Shyamali Dharmage1,
  3. Geza Benke2,
  4. Martine Dennekamp3,
  5. John Burgess1,
  6. Jennifer L Perret1,4,
  7. Caroline Lodge1,
  8. Stephen Morrison5,
  9. David Peter Johns6,
  10. Graham Giles1,7,
  11. Lyle Gurrin1,
  12. Paul S Thomas8,
  13. John Llewelyn Hopper1,
  14. Richard Wood-Baker6,
  15. Bruce Thompson9,
  16. Iain Feather10,
  17. Roel Vermeulen11,
  18. Hans Kromhout11,
  19. Debbie Jarvis12,
  20. Judith Garcia Aymerich13,
  21. E Haydn Walters1,6,
  22. Michael J Abramson2,
  23. Melanie Claire Matheson1
  1. 1 Allergy and Lung Health Unit, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  2. 2 Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  3. 3 Environmental Public Health, Environment Protection Authority Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  4. 4 Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  5. 5 Department of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  6. 6 School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
  7. 7 Cancer Epidemiology and Intelligence Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  8. 8 Faculty of Medicine, University of new South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  9. 9 Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  10. 10 Medicine, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia
  11. 11 Environmental Epidemiology Division, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  12. 12 National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
  13. 13 ISGlobal, Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (CREAL), Barcelona, Spain
  1. Correspondence to Prof Shyamali Dharmage, Allergy and Lung Health Unit, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, The University of melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia; s.dharmage{at}unimelb.edu.au

Abstract

Rationale While cross-sectional studies have shown associations between certain occupational exposures and lower levels of lung function, there was little evidence from population-based studies with repeated lung function measurements.

Objectives We aimed to investigate the associations between occupational exposures and longitudinal lung function decline in the population-based Tasmanian Longitudinal Health Study.

Methods Lung function decline between ages 45 years and 50 years was assessed using data from 767 participants. Using lifetime work history calendars completed at age 45 years, exposures were assigned according to the ALOHA plus Job Exposure Matrix. Occupational exposures were defined as ever exposed and cumulative exposure -unit- years. We investigated effect modification by sex, smoking and asthma status.

Results Compared with those without exposure, ever exposures to aromatic solvents and metals were associated with a greater decline in FEV1 (aromatic solvents 15.5 mL/year (95% CI −24.8 to 6.3); metals 11.3 mL/year (95% CI −21.9 to – 0.7)) and FVC (aromatic solvents 14.1 mL/year 95% CI −28.8 to – 0.7; metals 17.5 mL/year (95% CI –34.3 to – 0.8)). Cumulative exposure (unit years) to aromatic solvents was also associated with greater decline in FEV1 and FVC. Women had lower cumulative exposure years to aromatic solvents than men (mean (SD) 9.6 (15.5) vs 16.6 (14.6)), but greater lung function decline than men. We also found association between ever exposures to gases/fumes or mineral dust and greater decline in lung function.

Conclusions Exposures to aromatic solvents and metals were associated with greater lung function decline. The effect of aromatic solvents was strongest in women. Preventive strategies should be implemented to reduce these exposures in the workplace.

  • solvents
  • chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • job exposure matrix
  • occupational exposure
  • lung function
  • FEV1
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • SD and MCM are joint senior authors.

  • Contributors Study concept and design: SMA, SD, GB, RV, HK, EHW, MJA, MCM. Acquisition of data: SMA, SD, PST, RW-B, BT, IF, RV, HK, EHW, MJA, MCM. Analysis and interpretation of data: SMA, SD, GB, JLP, MD, RV, HK, MJA, MCM. Drafting of the manuscript: SMA, SD, GB, MD, MCM. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: all authors. Statistical analysis: SMA, MCM. Obtained funding: SD, GB, DPJ, LG, PST, JLH, RW-B, BT, IF, EHW, MJA, MCM. Study supervision: SM, SD, GB, MD, MCM. SMA and MCM had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

  • Funding This study was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia under the NHMRC project grant scheme (299901, 1021275) and NHMRC European collaborative grant scheme (1101313) as part of ALEC (Ageing Lungs in European Cohorts) funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 633212; The University of Melbourne; Clifford Craig Medical Research Trust of Tasmania; the Victorian, Queensland and Tasmanian Asthma Foundations; The Royal Hobart Hospital; Helen MacPherson Smith Trust; and GlaxoSmithKline. The funding agencies had no direct role in the conduct of the study, the collection, management, statistical analysis and interpretation of the data, preparation or approval of the manuscript. ISGlobal is a member of the CERCA Programme, Generalitat de Catalunya.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Obtained.

  • Ethics approval Both follow-ups were approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the University of Melbourne (HREC Ref. numbers 040375.1 and 0932983.1, respectively).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles