Introduction Males have a higher prevalence of asthma in childhood, whereas females have a higher prevalence in adolescence and adulthood. The ‘adolescent switch’ observed between sexes during puberty has been hypothesised to be due to fluctuating sex hormones. Robust evidence of the involvement of sex hormones in asthma could lead to development of therapeutic interventions.
Methods We combine observational evidence using longitudinal data on sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), total and bioavailable testosterone and asthma from a subset of males (n=512) in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, and genetic evidence of SHBG and asthma using two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR), a method of causal inference. We meta-analysed two-sample MR results across two large data sets, the Trans-National Asthma Genetics Consortium genome-wide association study of asthma and UK Biobank (over 460 000 individuals combined).
Results Observational evidence indicated weak evidence of a protective effect of increased circulating testosterone on asthma in males in adolescence, but no strong pattern of association with SHBG. Genetic evidence using two-sample MR indicated a protective effect of increased SHBG, with an OR for asthma of 0.86 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.00) for the inverse-variance weighted approach and an OR of 0.83 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.96) for the weighted median estimator, per unit increase in natural log SHBG. A sex-stratified sensitivity analysis suggested the protective effect of SHBG was mostly evident in females.
Conclusion We report the first suggestive evidence of a protective effect of genetically elevated SHBG on asthma, which may provide a biological explanation behind the observed asthma sex discordance. Further work is required to disentangle the downstream effects of SHBG on asthma and the molecular pathways involved.
- sex hormones
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
What is the key question?
Is there evidence for the involvement of sex hormones in the development of asthma that may explain the sex discordance in asthma prevalence?
What is the bottom line?
Increased circulating sex hormone-binding globulin appears to be causally associated with a decreased risk of asthma, with effects stronger in females.
Why read on?
This is the first study to investigate the effects of sex hormones on asthma and uses a dual observational and genetic epidemiological approach drawing on multiple independent data sets.
Observational epidemiological studies suggest that males have a higher prevalence of asthma in childhood, whereas females have a higher prevalence in adolescence and adulthood.1 2 The age at which this switch occurs has not been precisely determined, with conflicting research on whether puberty is associated with the switch in prevalence.1 3 The cause of the switch has been suggested to be multifactorial4 with sex hormones hypothesised to play a role in this switch, due to puberty coinciding with fluctuations in levels of circulating sex hormones.5
The hypothesised involvement of sex hormones in asthma is further supported by the acute deterioration of asthma observed during the menstrual cycle6 7 (coinciding with heightened sex hormone levels), as well as by the known gender dimorphism of the immune system8 (with females generally having stronger innate and adaptive immune responses than males in adulthood), and by the vast difference in prevalence of autoimmune disorders where over 75% of cases are female.9 In animal models, testosterone has been indicated to be immunosuppressant10 whereas oestrogen is potentially proinflammatory.11
Sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) is a glycoprotein and the major transporter and putative regulator of androgens (eg, testosterone) and oestrogens. SHBG may also exert direct effects of its own independently of the sex hormones it regulates.12 Variation in SHBG levels has been previously associated with risk of cancer13 and type 2 diabetes.14 The potential remains that the effects of sex hormones may be put to therapeutic use in the context of asthma. However, robust evidence of their involvement from human population studies is first required.
Observational epidemiological studies are often subject to confounding and reverse causation. Mendelian randomisation (MR) is a method of causal inference that uses germline genetic variants (usually single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP)) as instrumental variables (IV).15 16 Based on Mendel’s law of independent assortment, genetic variants are distributed independently and randomly with respect to other genetic variants that are not in linkage disequilibrium and assuming no population stratification. Randomisation of genetic variants ensures that any association observed between the IVs and the disease outcome is most likely explained by an unbiased causal effect of the exposure on the outcome, given a set of prior assumptions.16 This is because MR study design is analogous to a randomised controlled trial with genetic variants randomising individuals to a higher or lower lifetime exposure to the trait of interest. In the case of SHBG as the exposure of interest, carriers of variant alleles associated with elevated circulating SHBG in previous genome-wide association studies (GWAS) may be considered as being genetically randomised to higher lifetime average levels of circulating SHBG. MR application is increasingly facilitated by the availability of summary statistics from GWAS from large consortia, with IV-exposure estimates and IV-outcome estimates derived from different data sets, in an approach termed two-sample MR.17
Both SHBG and testosterone levels are highly heritable traits with previous GWAS identifying multiple SNPs associated with both traits.18 19 The strongest association has been observed between the rs12150660 SNP located in the SHBG gene and circulating SHBG (p=1.8×10−106), estimated to account for ~7.8% of circulating SHBG variation in males and ~3.3% in females, in a study with a combined discovery plus replication sample size of 28 837 individuals.18 SNPs identified as associated with circulating testosterone largely overlap those identified for SHBG.
In this study, we test the hypothesis that circulating sex hormones have an effect on development of asthma. We combine observational evidence using longitudinal sex hormone data from a subset of males in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) cohort, with genetic evidence from two-sample MR in two large data sets, the Trans-National Asthma Genetics Consortium (TAGC) GWAS of asthma and UK Biobank.
Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children
The ALSPAC recruited 14 541 pregnant women resident in Avon, UK with expected dates of delivery from 1 April 1991 to 31 December 1992.20 21 A detailed description of the cohort can be found in online supplementary methods appendix A1. SHBG and total testosterone (TT) were measured in a subset of 513 males at 9.9, 11.8, 13.8, 15.5 and 17.8 years of age using ELISA in peripheral blood samples as previously described.22 Longitudinal sex hormone measurements were not available for females in ALSPAC. Bioavailable testosterone (BT) was derived from measures of TT and SHBG as previously described.22 Genetic data for the ALSPAC children were generated by Sample Logistics and Genotyping Facilities at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute and LabCorp. Data on asthma in the last 12 months were extracted from questionnaires completed by the ALSPAC mothers at 10.7, 13.1 and 13.8 years of age, and by the study participants themselves at 16.5 and 22.9 years. Details of the hormone measurements, genotype preprocessing and derived asthma measures can be found in online supplementary methods appendix A1.
The UK Biobank project is a large prospective cohort study of approximately 500 000 individuals from across the UK, aged 40–69 years at recruitment. Details of the study recruitment have been previously described.23 24 Genotype imputation and quality control (QC) are described in online supplementary methods appendix A1. Data on ever having had an asthma diagnosis were self-reported by UK Biobank participants by touchscreen questionnaire. Following genotype-related exclusions and QC, a total of 38 337 asthma cases and 296 245 controls remained.
Trans-National Asthma Genetics Consortium genome-wide association study
The TAGC performed a large-scale ancestry-specific GWAS of asthma25 using a total of 23 948 asthma cases and 118 538 controls from 66 studies. The subsample of European ancestry comprised 19 954 asthma cases and 107 715 controls from 56 studies, identifying 673 genome-wide significant SNPs. The study meta-analysed results from cohorts of individuals with both childhood-onset and adult-onset asthma across a range of ages. Full summary statistics from the GWAS meta-analysis for all analysed SNPs are available online via the GWAS catalogue.26 The results of the random effects meta-analysis of European ancestry were used in all analyses.
Cross-sectional associations of sex hormones and asthma at each of the five time points in ALSPAC were investigated using serial logistic regression in STATA V.14.2. Model 1 was unadjusted for the previous measure of asthma/hormone and model 2 was adjusted for the previous measure, therefore modelling change between time points. Hormone measures were matched with their closest asthma response, ensuring asthma (the outcome) proceeded the hormone measurement. Analyses were carried out in male singletons (n=512). Results of cross-sectional models were compared with the path analysis.
In order to test for potential differences in effects between time points, path analysis (a type of multiple regression analysis) was conducted using STATA V.14.2 and STATA structural equation model (SEM) builder. Separate generalised SEMs were fitted for SHBG, TT and BT and asthma (online supplementary figures S1–S3 appendix A1). All models were adjusted for maternal confounders (maternal smoking, maternal education, parity, gestational age, maternal age) as well as participants’ exact age. Details of covariate adjustments and the rationale of the path analyses can be found in online supplementary methods appendix A1.
In order to increase statistical power and counter possible bias due to missingness, multiple imputation was used to complete missing values in the exposure, outcome and covariates, in both the cross-sectional regressions and the path analysis using ICE27 in STATA V.14.2 (StataCorp, release 14).27 A detailed description of the multiple imputation can be seen in online supplementary appendix A1. Results using the imputed data set were compared with the complete case analysis. Descriptions of the variables are shown in table 1.
Age-dependent effects of SHBG variants
As a preliminary step, we examined whether the effects of the SNPs associated with SHBG in the GWAS by Coviello et al 18 had an age-dependent effect on SHBG and TT using the ALSPAC subsample (males aged 9.9–17.8 years). Generalised linear regression models were implemented in R V.3.4.1 to test cross-sectional associations between each of the SNPs and either z-scored SHBG, TT or BT at each of the five time points, adjusting for the top 20 derived principal components (PC).
Two-sample MR was used to investigate the hypothesised causal effect of SHBG on asthma. The two-sample approach requires only summary-level data from GWAS, enabling SNP-outcome and SNP-exposure effects to be derived from different data sets. The assumptions of two-sample MR are similar to those of one-sample MR, while additionally requiring that the summary statistics for both the exposure and the outcome are derived from studies of comparable populations. Analyses were performed using the TwoSampleMR R package, part of MR-Base.17 The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) approach was used as a primary analysis, with two complementary estimation methods as sensitivity analyses to assess horizontal pleiotropy (where the genetic variant associates with the outcome via an independent pathway to the exposure): a weighted-median estimator28 and MR Egger regression.29 Evidence for effect size dilution was assessed using the unweighted I2 statistic,30 also called the I2 GX statistic.
Individual-level data from UK Biobank and summary statistics from the TAGC GWAS of asthma (where ALSPAC was a contributing cohort) were used to derive SNP-asthma effects. In UK Biobank logistic regressions in R 3.4.1 were used to determine the effects of each SNP on self-reported ever asthma, adjusted for genotype array (chip), sex and top 40 PCs. For TAGC, the results of the random effects meta-analysis of European ancestry were used.
Two combinations of independent SHBG IVs were used, based on associations reported in the previous GWAS (online supplementary table S5)18. IV combination A comprised entirely SNPs located in the SHBG gene, determined as independent variants in the conditional analysis by Coviello et al.18 Variants in the SHBG gene region are less likely to be subject to horizontal pleiotropy. This resulted in three variants comprising IV combination A. For IV combination B, all SNPs identified in the previous GWAS of SHBG were used (nine variants), including those in combination A. We excluded only SNPs located on the X-chromosome (rs1573036), SNPs with a minor allele frequency <0.01 in UK Biobank (rs6258), or SNPs unavailable in the Haplotype Reference Consortium-imputed UK Biobank data set (rs2411984). This approach using two complementary IV combinations has been used previously for assessing the effects of SHBG on metabolites31 in an MR framework. The diagram in figure 1 presents an overview of the analyses performed.
Final MR estimated effects of SHBG on asthma resulting from both the TAGC GWAS and UK Biobank were combined in a fixed effects meta-analysis using the metafor R package. The combined meta-analysis sample size consisted of 462 251 individuals of which 58 291 were asthma cases.
Since we hypothesised that the effects of SHBG were likely to be sex specific, MR analyses were repeated on a sex-stratified sample in UK Biobank, separately for male (n=154 564 of which 16 308 asthma cases) and female participants (n=180 018 of which 22 029 asthma cases).
Descriptions of the different sex hormone measurements, asthma reports and confounder variables included in the observational analyses, with percentage missingness for each variable, are presented in table 1.
Serial cross-sectional models of SHBG, TT and BT in males revealed little evidence of an association between SHBG and asthma (model 1 in online supplementary table S1 appendix A1), but a consistent inverse association between TT and BT on asthma after 11.8 years (model 1 in online supplementary tables S2 and S3 appendix A1). However, CIs were wide for both TT and BT and overlapped the null. Serial cross-sectional models using multiple imputation and adjusted for previous measures of asthma and either SHBG, TT or BT (table 2) demonstrated similar estimates to the base models. For SHBG there was an OR for asthma of 0.96 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.24), 1.54 (95% CI 0.71 to 3.37), 1.32 (95% CI 0.64 to 2.70), 1.18 (95% CI 0.67 to 2.06) and 1.02 (95% CI 0.57 to 1.83) at 9.9, 11.8, 13.8, 15.5 and 17.8 years, respectively. For TT there was an OR for asthma of 1.12 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.43), 0.85 (95% CI 0.55 to 1.32), 0.80 (95% CI 0.46 to 1.38), 0.89 (95% CI 0.59 to 1.35) and 0.71 (95% CI 0.43 to 1.16) at the respective time points, whereas for BT there was an OR of 1.02 (95% CI 0.77 to 1.34), 0.79 (95% CI 0.47 to 1.34), 0.86 (95% CI 0.48 to 1.55), 0.87 (95% CI 0.56 to 1.35) and 0.87 (95% CI 0.54 to 1.41) at the respective time points. Comparison of the different cross-sectional models can be seen in online supplementary tables S1–S3 appendix A1.
Results of path analyses using multiple imputation (online supplementary table S4 and figures S1–S3 appendix A1) were similar to results from the serial cross-sectional models, with no clear evidence of an association between SHBG and asthma and only weak evidence for a protective effect of increased TT on asthma in adolescence (table 2). Since there was little evidence of an association at the individual time points in either the serial cross-sectional or the path analysis we did no test for differences between time points in the path analysis. We therefore present the results of the simpler cross-sectional models in table 2, with the results of the path analysis in online supplementary table S4 appendix A1.
Age-dependent effects of SHBG variants
Serial cross-sectional analysis of the effect of the SHBG SNPs in ALSPAC revealed that only the rs12150660 variant had a consistent effect on SHBG levels and an age-dependent effect on TT and BT (figure 2 and online supplementary appendix A2). For SHBG there was an estimated 0.41 (95% CI 0.24 to 0.59), 0.39 (95% CI 0.23 to 0.55), 0.24 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.42), 0.38 (95% CI 0.21 to 0.55) and 0.38 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.55) SD increase in circulating SHBG (nmol/L) per copy of the rs12150660 variant allele (GT or TT genotype) at the ages of 9.9, 11.8, 13.8, 15.5 and 17.8 years, respectively. For TT, there was no evidence of an association at the earlier ages, however an effect was observed at the later time points. There was an estimated −0.03 (95% CI −0.21 to 0.15), −0.07 (95% CI −0.24 to 0.10), 0.27 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.45), 0.30 (95% CI 0.13 to 0.47) and 0.30 (95% CI 0.13 to 0.48) SD increase in testosterone per copy of the rs12150660 variant allele at the ages of 9.9, 11.8, 13.8, 15.5 and 17.8 years, respectively. For BT, there was an inverse pattern of association to that of SHBG, consistent with its derivation from the assayed SHBG and TT measures. There was a −0.37 (95% CI −0.54 to −0.19), −0.15 (95% CI −0.32 to 0.02), 0.10 (95% CI −0.09 to 0.28), −0.10 (95% CI −0.27 to 0.07) and −0.23 (95% CI −0.40 to −0.05) SD change in BT per copy of the rs12150660 variant allele at the five respective time points. There was also some evidence for an effect of rs1641537 and rs8023580 on SHBG and BT levels in childhood (figure 2 and online supplementary appendix A2). However, the remaining SNPs indicated inconsistent patterns of effect on SHBG, TT and BT across the five time points.
In contrast to the observational findings, there was evidence of a protective effect of increased SHBG on asthma when using MR (figure 3 and online supplementary tables S6-S7 and supplementary table S8 appendix A1). In IVW analyses, there was an estimated 0.86 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.00) OR per unit increase in log SHBG for IV combination A and 0.94 (95% CI 0.82 to 1.09) OR for asthma when using IV combination B. Meta-analysed weighted-median estimates were similar, with a 0.83 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.96) OR for asthma per unit increase in log SHBG for IV combination A and an estimated 0.85 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.97) OR for asthma for IV combination B. Wider CIs and smaller effect sizes in the IVW estimated effects of combination B may indicate the presence of directional pleiotropy, which the IVW method is not robust to. This conclusion is supported by the results of the more conservative combination A, which is less likely to introduce pleiotropic effects. Estimates from MR Egger regression for combination B (MR Egger regression was not applied to combination A as there were not enough SNPs) were in the same direction as estimates from the other two methods with a 0.81 (95% CI 0.60 to 1.09) OR for asthma per unit increase in log SHBG, but with wider CIs that spanned the null (online supplementary figure S4 appendix A1), possibly reflecting the lower statistical power of MR Egger regression. There was no indication of dilution in the MR Egger regression estimates (I2 for dilution=0.99). Heterogeneity tests for combination B in UK Biobank indicated some evidence for heterogeneity between SNPs for the IVW method (Cochran’s Q=15.4, Q p=0.051), with an I2 for heterogeneity between SNPs of 48.1%. There was weak evidence for directional pleiotropy in combination B in UK Biobank, estimated using the MR Egger intercept (Egger intercept=1.01, p=0.173). Scatterplots of the SNP-asthma and SNP-SHBG effects can be seen in online supplementary figures S5 and S6 appendix A1.
Sex-stratified MR analysis
The sex-stratified analysis in UK Biobank indicated differences in MR estimated effects between females and males (figure 4 and figure 5). For females, there was an IVW estimated 0.80 (95% CI 0.63 to 1.01) OR for asthma per unit increase in log SHBG when using IV combination A, whereas in males there was an IVW estimated 0.95 (95% CI 0.77 to 1.18) OR for asthma. For the weighted-median estimated effect there was an OR of 0.80 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.98) for females and an OR of 0.93 (95% CI 0.73 to 1.17) for males. When using IV combination B, similar evidence for a protective effect of SHBG on asthma was obtained in females, whereas these estimates largely agreed with estimates based on IV combination A in males. Larger effects were observed in females when using the weighted-median estimator and MR Egger regression sensitivity analyses than the IVW estimate, indicating horizontal pleiotropy in IV combination B (complete description of results in online supplementary tables S9-S10 and supplementary result appendix A1).
We have conducted a novel hybrid investigation of the associations of SHBG and testosterone with asthma using dual longitudinal data analysis and an MR design. Observational evidence indicated some evidence of a protective effect of increased TT on asthma, but no clear pattern for SHBG. Genetic evidence using two-sample MR indicated a protective effect of increased SHBG on asthma, with the effects most evident among females and indications of horizontal pleiotropy in the more liberal combination of IVs.
Notably, the sole genetic variant to demonstrate a consistent effect on circulating SHBG in ALSPAC was the rs12150660 SNP. However, there was no discernible effect of the variant on TT levels until puberty, gradually increasing during teenage years. This observation fits with previously reported biological understanding of the polymorphism, suggesting that its location near a pentanucleotide repeat which affects SHBG expression levels in vitro32 drives the association. The remaining eight SNPs showed inconsistent patterns of association with circulating SHBG. However, associations may not have replicated because of lack of statistical power due to the small sample size or because effects of these SNPs may not be evident until later life (the original GWAS included only adult participants).
Although previous hypotheses have suggested an immunological/inflammatory effect of SHBG on asthma, MR does not distinguish between which mechanistic pathways link the exposure to the outcome. Therefore, any indication of SHBG’s causality does not imply a biological or immunological effect of sex hormones.
The differences in effects of SHBG on asthma between sexes observed have the potential to explain the increase in female asthmatics observed after puberty. Since the evidence indicates that an increase in SHBG is protective against asthma, then the decrease in circulating SHBG observed in females during puberty33 34 may be a biological trigger for development of asthma.
Little previous evidence exists of the effects of sex hormones on asthma. We have not been able to find any previous literature that has investigated the effect of circulating SHBG on asthma that could be used to facilitate comparisons with our MR estimated effects.
Strengths and limitations
The current study has several major strengths. It is based on strong biological rationale with a hypothesis that has been extensively reviewed.35 The biological hypothesis is underpinned by an established observation of sex discordance in asthma prevalence, previously corroborated in ALSPAC.36 The current analyses combine observational evidence with genetic evidence from MR, using a triangulation approach,37 and multiple complementary approaches and data sets, strengthening the conclusions.
In the observational analysis of the ALSPAC subsample, testosterone distribution at 13.8 years was severely non-normal which may lead to imprecision of the SEs of the estimated effects. It was hypothesised that this was due to some but not all males having transitioned through puberty. However, since the non-normality is observed only at the one time point, estimates from this single measure do not alter the conclusions.
All male hormone measurements were carried out using immunoassays, with evidence suggesting that immunoassays lack precision, particularly in children, where testosterone levels are low.38 At the earliest time point, a large number of measurements had to be set to the lowest detectable assay value. Sample sizes were also small due to the non-overlap of individuals with reports of asthma and those with measured sex hormones, with a large fraction of missing measurements, particularly at the final time point (table 1). We used multiple imputation to attempt to increase power for the analysis and additionally included reports of wheezing in the last 12 months as auxiliary variables that may predict asthma in order to aid the multiple imputation. Assuming an adequate number of imputations and valid imputation, that is, all data are missing at random and the imputation and analysis models are correct, the results from multiple imputation should be unbiased. However, multiple imputation will lead to large SEs and wide CIs if there is little overall information in the data sets. After multiple imputation, we observed large SEs and wide CIs in our estimated effects, indicating that statistical power to detect an association may have remained low in the sample size of 512 individuals despite imputation. All observational analyses were conducted in a subsample of males, and the observational effects of SHBG and testosterone on asthma in females have not been assessed, with the effects likely to differ substantially from males given the differences in effects between the two sexes observed in the genetic analyses.
A major limitation of the genetic analyses is that a two-sample MR-based approach estimates average lifetime effects of an exposure on a disease outcome and does not distinguish between changes in the magnitude of that effect during different critical periods of the life course. This means that overall effect estimates may not be representative of true effects at all ages if the exposure only affects the outcome at certain critical periods of the life course. This is particularly true for diseases such as asthma which are known to wax and wane. It was therefore not possible to determine if SHBG is causal to the ‘adolescent switch’ observed in asthma prevalence or if the decreased risk is an unrelated early-life or later-life effect of SHBG on asthma. Future studies could attempt to develop methods to investigate time-varying exposures (eg, SHBG) on time-varying outcomes (eg, asthma) in an MR framework.
We did not attempt to stratify the MR analysis by age of asthma onset due to measurement error being a potential major problem in the UK Biobank, as the adult participants aged 40–69 at recruitment were asked to recall age of asthma onset, likely leading to substantial imprecision in reports. Additionally, as SNPs used as SHBG IVs in the MR were derived from adult population GWAS, we considered them unlikely to proxy SHBG levels as robustly in childhood, given the results of the SNP validation step in the ALSPAC subsample (shown in figure 2), which would further reduce statistical power to detect an association. Similarly, although the TAGC GWAS consortium performed a sensitivity analysis where participants were stratified into childhood-onset asthma and adult-onset asthma, the cut-off age for childhood-onset asthma was 16 years of age, by which time any changes linked to sex hormones will have already occurred. Therefore, we did not conduct an age-of-onset stratified MR to compare the effects of sex hormones prepuberty versus postpuberty. In the sex-stratified analysis in UK Biobank, the lower number of asthma cases in the male subsample compared with the female subsample may have led to lower statistical power and wider CIs, which may explain the differences in results. Given that the CIs overlap substantially, we cannot determine with certainty whether effects are specific to females.
The genetic correlation between SHBG and testosterone (as well as other hormones such as oestrogens) presents a problem in MR and it was not possible to identify SNPs associated with testosterone that were not also associated with SHBG. A previous GWAS of testosterone19 identified several polymorphisms associated with testosterone, including the rs12150660 variant; however, all reported variants were also identified as associated with SHBG. It may be possible to investigate such situations in the future using multivariate MR.39 Winner’s curse is a likely issue in two-sample MR studies that derive SNP-exposure estimates from the same GWAS used to select IVs, and although we used effect estimates from the combined discovery and replication samples of the published GWAS of SHBG, which may mitigate effects due to winner’s curse, some residual bias may remain.
Overall, we have performed multiple analyses at several different time points in order to disentangle the complex relationship between the various sex hormones and asthma. The possibility of spurious results arising due to chance cannot therefore be ruled out. Future work should attempt to replicate these findings in independent data sets in order to confirm the current conclusions.
In this study, we present the first tentative evidence that increased circulating SHBG is causally associated with a decreased risk of asthma, with effects stronger in females. Although findings from the observational epidemiological analysis indicated little evidence of an effect of SHBG on asthma and only weak evidence for a protective effect of increased testosterone on asthma in the subsample of males, genetic epidemiological approach indicated some evidence of a protective effect of increased SHBG on asthma. These findings from multiple independent data sets align with previous hypotheses suggesting that fluctuating sex hormones, particularly during puberty, may promote asthma development in females. These suggestive associations may provide some insight into the biological mechanisms behind the observed asthma sex discordance as well as the overall pathology of asthma. Whether the effects of sex hormones are meaningful as potential intervention targets is unknown and further work is required to disentangle the downstream effects of SHBG on asthma.
We are extremely grateful to all the families who took part in this study, the midwives for their help in recruiting them, and the whole ALSPAC team, which includes interviewers, computer and laboratory technicians, clerical workers, research scientists, volunteers, managers, receptionists and nurses. We would also like to thank the Trans-National Asthma Genetics Consortium (TAGC) for making the summary results of their genome-wide association study (GWAS) publicly available. Quality control filtering of the UK Biobank data was conducted by R Mitchell, G Hemani, T Dudding and L Paternoster as described in the published protocol (doi: https://doi.org/10.5523/bris.3074krb6t2frj29yh2b03x3wxj).
Contributors RA, RG, KT and CLR were involved in project conceptualisation. RA and KT performed the formal analysis. RA, RG, RCR, JY and CLR were involved in methodology development. PH was involved in data curation and software provision. RA prepared the original draft. RG, PH, JY, RCR, CLR and KT reviewed and edited the manuscript.
Funding This work was supported by the MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit and the University of Bristol (MC_UU_00011/5 and MC_UU_00011/3). The UK Medical Research Council and Wellcome (Grant ref: 102215/2/13/2) and the University of Bristol provide core support for ALSPAC. A comprehensive list of grants funding is available on the ALSPAC website (http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/external/documents/grant-acknowledgements.pdf). This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource under Application No 15825.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent Obtained.
Ethics approval Ethical approval for ALSPAC was obtained from the ALSPAC Ethics and Law Committee and the local research ethics committees. UK Biobank received ethical approval from the Research Ethics Committee (REC reference 11/NW/0382).
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.